KNEL/TSYSDevStack
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat: add TSYSDevStack SupportStack MVP prompt and supporting files

Browse Source 
Co-authored-by: Qwen-Coder <qwen-coder@alibabacloud.com>
This commit is contained in:
Charles N Wyble - admin
2025-10-28 17:30:02 -05:00
parent 84b84ea023
commit 05f4be4886
5 changed files with 617 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

170
collab/SupportStack/BuildTheStack Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
# TSYSDevStack SupportStack Demo Builder
## Objective
Create an out-of-the-box, localhost-bound only, ephemeral Docker volume-only demonstration version of the SupportStack components documented in the VendorList-SupportStack.md file.
## MVP Test Run Objective
Create a proof of concept with docker-socket-proxy, homepage, and wakaapi components that demonstrate proper homepage integration via Docker Compose labels. This MVP will serve as a validation of the full approach before proceeding with the complete stack implementation.
## Architecture Requirements
- All Docker artifacts must be prefixed with `TSYSDevStack-SupportStack-Demo`
- Run exclusively on localhost (localhost binding only)
- Ephemeral volumes only (no persistent storage)
- Resource limits set for single-user demo capacity
- No external network access (localhost bound only)
- Components: docker-socket-proxy, portainer, homepage as foundational elements
- All artifacts must go into artifacts/SupportStack directory to keep the directory well organized and avoid cluttering the root directory
## Development Methodology
- Strict Test Driven Development (TDD) process
- Write test → Execute test → Test fails → Write minimal code to pass test
- 75%+ code coverage requirement
- 100% test pass requirement
- Component-by-component development approach
- Complete one component before moving to the next
## MVP Component Development Sequence (Test Run)
1. **MVP**: docker-socket-proxy, homepage, wakaapi (each must fully satisfy Definition of Done before proceeding)
- docker-socket-proxy: Enable Docker socket access for homepage integration
- homepage: Configure to access Docker socket and discover labeled containers
- wakaapi: Integrate with homepage using proper labels
- All services must utilize Docker Compose labels to automatically show up in homepage
- Implement proper service discovery for homepage integration using gethomepage labels
- Ensure all components are properly labeled with homepage integration labels
- Implement proper startup ordering using depends_on with health checks
## Component Completion Validation
- Each component must pass health checks for 5 consecutive minutes before moving to the next
- All tests must pass with 100% success rate before moving to the next component
- Resource utilization must be within specified limits before moving to the next component
- Integration tests with previously completed components must pass before moving forward
- Homepage must automatically detect and display all services with proper labels
## Technical Specifications
- No Bitnami images allowed
- Use official or trusted repository images only
- Implement Docker Compose orchestration
- Use Docker named volumes for ephemeral storage
- Implement proper resource limits in docker-compose.yml: CPU: 0.5-1.0 cores per service, Memory: 128MB-512MB per service (variable based on service type), Disk: 1GB per service for ephemeral volumes
- Implement comprehensive health checks for all services with appropriate intervals and timeouts
- Implement proper networking (internal only)
- All ports bound to localhost (127.0.0.1)
- All environment variables must be pre-set in TSYSDevStack-SupportStack-Demo-Settings file (single settings file for simplicity in demo)
- All docker compose files (one per component) should be prefixed with: TSYSDevStack-SupportStack-Demo-DockerCompose-
- All docker compose files should use environment variables for everything (variables will be set in TSYSDevStack-SupportStack-Demo-Settings file)
- Health checks must validate service readiness before proceeding with dependent components
- Health check endpoints must be accessible only from internal network
- Health check configurations must be parameterized via environment variables
- All services must utilize Docker Compose labels to automatically show up in homepage
- Implement proper homepage integration labels for automatic service discovery using gethomepage/homepage labels:
- Required: homepage.group, homepage.name, homepage.icon
- Optional: homepage.href, homepage.description, homepage.widget.type, homepage.widget.url, homepage.widget.key, homepage.widget.fields, homepage.weight
- Homepage integration must include proper naming, icons, and status indicators
- Use pinned image tags rather than 'latest' for all container images
- Run containers as non-root users where possible
- Enable read-only filesystems where appropriate
- Implement security scanning during build process (for demo, secrets via environment variables are acceptable)
- Define network policies for internal communication only
- Use depends_on with health checks to ensure proper startup ordering of services
## Stack Control
- All control of the stack should go into a script called TSYSDevStack-SupportStack-Demo-Control.sh
- The script should take the following arguments: start/stop/uninstall/update/test
- Ensure script is executable and contains error handling
## Component Definition of Done
- All health checks pass consistently for each component
- Test suite passes with 100% success rate (unit, integration, e2e)
- Code coverage of >75% for each component
- Resource limits properly implemented and validated (CPU: 0.5-1.0 cores, Memory: 128MB-512MB, Disk: 1GB per service)
- All services properly bound to localhost only
- Proper error handling and logging implemented (with retry logic and exponential backoff)
- Documentation and configuration files created
- Component successfully starts, runs, and stops without manual intervention
- Component properly integrates with other components without conflicts
- Automated self-recovery mechanisms implemented for common failure scenarios
- Performance benchmarks met for single-user demo capacity (apply reasonable defaults based on service type)
- Security scans completed and passed (run as non-root, read-only filesystems where appropriate)
- No hard-coded values; all configuration via environment variables
- All dependencies properly specified and resolved using depends_on with health checks
- Component properly labeled with homepage integration labels (homepage.group, homepage.name, homepage.icon, etc.)
- Container uses pinned image tags rather than 'latest'
## Testing Requirements
- Unit tests for each component configuration
- Integration tests for component interactions
- End-to-end tests for the complete stack
- Performance tests to validate resource limits
- Security tests for localhost binding
- Health check tests for all services
- Coverage report generation
- Continuous test execution during development
- Automated test suite execution for each component before moving to the next
- End-to-end validation tests after each component integration
## Error Resolution Strategy
- Implement autonomous error detection and resolution
- Automatic retry mechanisms for transient failures with exponential backoff (base delay of 5s, max 5 attempts)
- Fallback configurations for compatibility issues
- Comprehensive logging for debugging
- Graceful degradation for optional components
- Automated rollback for failed deployments
- Self-healing mechanisms for common failure scenarios
- Automated restart policies with appropriate backoff strategies
- Deadlock detection and resolution mechanisms
- Resource exhaustion monitoring and mitigation
- Automated cleanup of failed component attempts
- Persistent state recovery mechanisms
- Fail-safe modes for critical components
- Circuit breaker patterns for service dependencies
- If unable to resolve an issue after multiple attempts, flag it in collab/SupportStack/HUMANHELP.md and move on
- Maintain running status reports in collab/SupportStack/STATUS.md
- Use git commit heavily to track progress
- Push to remote repository whenever a component is fully working/tested/validated
## Autonomous Operation Requirements
- Project must be capable of running unattended for 1-2 days without manual intervention
- All components must implement self-monitoring and self-healing
- Automated monitoring of resource usage with alerts if limits exceeded
- All failure scenarios must have automated recovery procedures
- Consistent state maintenance across all components
- Automated cleanup of temporary resources
- Comprehensive logging for troubleshooting without human intervention
- Built-in validation checks to ensure continued operation
- Automatic restart of failed services with appropriate retry logic
- Prevention of resource leaks and proper cleanup on shutdown
## Qwen Optimization
- Structured for autonomous execution
- Clear task decomposition
- Explicit success/failure criteria
- Self-contained instructions
- Automated validation steps
- Progress tracking mechanisms
## Output Deliverables
- Directory structure in artifacts/SupportStack
- Environment variables file: TSYSDevStack-SupportStack-Demo-Settings
- Control script: TSYSDevStack-SupportStack-Demo-Control.sh (with start/stop/uninstall/update/test arguments)
- Docker Compose files prefixed with: TSYSDevStack-SupportStack-Demo-DockerCompose-
- Component configuration files
- Test suite (unit, integration, e2e)
- Coverage reports
- Execution logs
- Documentation files
- Health check scripts and configurations
- Component readiness and liveness check definitions
- Automated validation scripts for component completion
- Monitoring and alerting configurations
The implementation should work autonomously, handling errors and resolving configuration issues without human intervention while strictly adhering to the TDD process.
## Production Considerations
- For production implementation, additional items will be addressed including:
- Enhanced monitoring and observability with centralized logging
- Advanced security measures (secrets management, network policies, etc.)
- Performance benchmarks and optimization
- Configuration management with separation of required vs optional parameters
- Advanced documentation (architecture diagrams, troubleshooting guides, etc.)
- Production-grade error handling and recovery procedures
- All deferred items will be tracked in collab/SupportStack/ProdRoadmap.md

28
collab/SupportStack/HUMANHELP.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
# 🚨 Human Assistance Required
This file tracks components, issues, or tasks that require human intervention during the autonomous build process.
## Current Items Requiring Help
| Date | Component | Issue | Priority | Notes |
|------|-----------|-------|----------|-------|
| 2025-10-28 | N/A | Initial file creation | Low | This file will be populated as issues arise during autonomous execution |
## Resolution Status Legend
- 🔄 **Pending**: Awaiting human review
- ⏳ **In Progress**: Being addressed by human
- ✅ **Resolved**: Issue fixed, can continue autonomously
- 🔄 **Delegated**: Assigned to specific team/resource
## How to Use This File
1. When autonomous processes encounter an issue they cannot resolve after multiple attempts
2. Add the issue to the table above with relevant details
3. Address the issue manually
4. Update the status when resolved
5. The autonomous process will check this file for resolved issues before continuing
## Guidelines for Autonomous Process
- Attempt to resolve issues automatically first (exponential backoff, retries)
- Only add to this file after reasonable number of attempts (typically 5)
- Provide sufficient context for human to understand and resolve the issue
- Continue with other tasks while waiting for human resolution

160
collab/SupportStack/ProdRoadmap.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
# 🚀 TSYSDevStack Production Roadmap
## 📋 Table of Contents
- [Overview](#overview)
- [Architecture & Infrastructure](#architecture--infrastructure)
- [Security](#security)
- [Monitoring & Observability](#monitoring--observability)
- [Performance](#performance)
- [Configuration Management](#configuration-management)
- [Documentation](#documentation)
- [Deployment & Operations](#deployment--operations)
- [Quality Assurance](#quality-assurance)
---
## 📖 Overview
This document outlines the roadmap for transitioning the TSYSDevStack demo into a production-ready system. Each section contains items that were deferred from the initial demo implementation to maintain focus on the MVP.
---
## 🏗️ Architecture & Infrastructure
| Feature | Priority | Status | Description |
|--------|----------|--------|-------------|
| Advanced Service Discovery | High | Deferred | Enhanced service mesh and discovery mechanisms beyond basic Docker labels |
| Load Balancing | High | Deferred | Production-grade load balancing for high availability |
| Scaling Mechanisms | High | Deferred | Horizontal and vertical scaling capabilities |
| Multi-Environment Support | Medium | Deferred | Separate configurations for dev/staging/prod environments |
| Infrastructure as Code | Medium | Deferred | Terraform or similar for infrastructure provisioning |
| Container Orchestration | High | Deferred | Kubernetes or similar for advanced orchestration |
---
## 🔐 Security
| Feature | Priority | Status | Description |
|--------|----------|--------|-------------|
| Secrets Management | High | Deferred | Dedicated secrets management solution (HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, etc.) |
| Network Security | High | Deferred | Advanced network policies, service mesh security |
| Identity & Access Management | High | Deferred | Centralized authentication and authorization |
| Image Vulnerability Scanning | High | Deferred | Automated security scanning of container images |
| Compliance Framework | Medium | Deferred | Implementation of compliance frameworks (SOC2, etc.) |
| Audit Logging | Medium | Deferred | Comprehensive audit trails for security events |
---
## 📊 Monitoring & Observability
| Feature | Priority | Status | Description |
|--------|----------|--------|-------------|
| Centralized Logging | High | Deferred | ELK stack, Loki, or similar for centralized log aggregation |
| Metrics Collection | High | Deferred | Prometheus, Grafana, or similar for comprehensive metrics |
| Distributed Tracing | Medium | Deferred | Jaeger, Zipkin, or similar for request tracing |
| Alerting & Notification | High | Deferred | Comprehensive alerting with multiple notification channels |
| Performance Monitoring | High | Deferred | APM tools for application performance tracking |
| Health Checks | Medium | Deferred | Advanced health and readiness check mechanisms |
---
## ⚡ Performance
| Feature | Priority | Status | Description |
|--------|----------|--------|-------------|
| Performance Benchmarks | High | Deferred | Defined performance metrics and SLAs |
| Resource Optimization | Medium | Deferred | Fine-tuning of CPU, memory, and storage allocation |
| Caching Strategies | Medium | Deferred | Implementation of various caching layers |
| Database Optimization | High | Deferred | Performance tuning for any database components |
| CDN Integration | Medium | Deferred | Content delivery network for static assets |
| Response Time Optimization | High | Deferred | Defined maximum response time requirements |
---
## ⚙️ Configuration Management
| Feature | Priority | Status | Description |
|--------|----------|--------|-------------|
| Configuration Validation | High | Deferred | Runtime validation of configuration parameters |
| Dynamic Configuration | Medium | Deferred | Ability to change configuration without restart |
| Feature Flags | Medium | Deferred | Feature toggle system for gradual rollouts |
| Configuration Versioning | Medium | Deferred | Version control for configuration changes |
| Required vs Optional Params | Low | Deferred | Clear separation and documentation |
| Configuration Templates | Medium | Deferred | Template system for configuration generation |
---
## 📚 Documentation
| Feature | Priority | Status | Description |
|--------|----------|--------|-------------|
| Architecture Diagrams | Medium | Deferred | Detailed system architecture and data flow diagrams |
| API Documentation | High | Deferred | Comprehensive API documentation |
| User Guides | Medium | Deferred | End-user documentation and tutorials |
| Admin Guides | High | Deferred | Administrative and operational documentation |
| Troubleshooting Guide | High | Deferred | Comprehensive troubleshooting documentation |
| Development Guide | Medium | Deferred | Developer onboarding and contribution guide |
| Security Guide | High | Deferred | Security best practices and procedures |
---
## 🚀 Deployment & Operations
| Feature | Priority | Status | Description |
|--------|----------|--------|-------------|
| CI/CD Pipeline | High | Deferred | Automated continuous integration and deployment |
| Blue-Green Deployment | Medium | Deferred | Zero-downtime deployment strategies |
| Rollback Procedures | High | Deferred | Automated and manual rollback mechanisms |
| Backup & Recovery | High | Deferred | Comprehensive backup and disaster recovery |
| Environment Promotion | Medium | Deferred | Automated promotion between environments |
| Deployment Validation | Medium | Deferred | Validation checks during deployment |
| Canary Releases | Medium | Deferred | Gradual rollout of new versions |
---
## ✅ Quality Assurance
| Feature | Priority | Status | Description |
|--------|----------|--------|-------------|
| Advanced Testing | High | Deferred | Performance, security, and chaos testing |
| Code Quality | Medium | Deferred | Static analysis, linting, and code review processes |
| Test Coverage | High | Deferred | Increased test coverage requirements |
| Integration Testing | High | Deferred | Comprehensive integration test suites |
| End-to-End Testing | High | Deferred | Automated end-to-end test scenarios |
| Security Testing | High | Deferred | Automated security scanning and testing |
| Performance Testing | High | Deferred | Load, stress, and soak testing |
---
## 📈 Roadmap Phases
### Phase 1: Foundation
- [ ] Secrets Management
- [ ] Basic Monitoring
- [ ] Security Hardening
- [ ] Configuration Management
### Phase 2: Reliability
- [ ] Advanced Monitoring
- [ ] CI/CD Implementation
- [ ] Backup & Recovery
- [ ] Performance Optimization
### Phase 3: Scalability
- [ ] Load Balancing
- [ ] Scaling Mechanisms
- [ ] Advanced Security
- [ ] Documentation Completion
### Phase 4: Excellence
- [ ] Advanced Observability
- [ ] Service Mesh
- [ ] Compliance Framework
- [ ] Production Documentation
---
## 🔄 Status Tracking
_Last Updated: October 28, 2025_
This roadmap will be updated as items are moved from the demo to production implementation.

185
collab/SupportStack/PromptReview-v1.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
# Prompt Review - TSYSDevStack SupportStack Demo Builder
## Executive Summary
As a senior expert prompt engineer and Docker DevOps/SRE, I've conducted a thorough review of the prompt file at `collab/SupportStack/BuildTheStack`. This document outlines the key areas requiring improvement to ensure the prompt produces a robust, reliable, and autonomous demonstration stack.
## Detailed Findings
### 1. Homepage Integration Clarity
**Issue:** The prompt mentions Docker Compose labels for homepage integration but doesn't specify which labels to use (e.g., for Homarr, Organizr, or other homepage tools).
The homepage software we are using is https://github.com/gethomepage/homepage
It is able to directly access the docker socket and integrate containers according to the documentation.
I am not sure what labels to use, I'm open to suggestions?
Can you research it and pick a standardized scheme?
**Recommendation:** Specify the exact label format required for automatic service discovery. For example:
```
- homepage integration labels (e.g., for Homarr): `com.homarr.icon`, `com.homarr.group`, `com.homarr.appid`
- common homepage labels: `traefik.enable`, `homepage.group`, `homepage.name`, etc.
```
### 2. Resource Constraint Definitions
**Issue:** The "single user demo capacity" is too vague - should define specific CPU, memory, and storage limits.
**Recommendation:** Define concrete resource limits such as:
- CPU: 0.5-1.0 cores per service
- Memory: 128MB-512MB per service (variable based on service type)
- Disk: Limit ephemeral volumes to 1GB per service
That sounds good. And yes, vary it per service type as needed.
### 3. Testing Methodology Clarity
**Issue:** The TDD process is described but doesn't specify if unit tests should be written before integration tests.
**Recommendation:** Clarify the testing hierarchy:
- Unit tests for individual service configuration
- Integration tests for service-to-service communication
- End-to-end tests for complete workflow validation
- Performance tests for resource constraints
That sounds good.
### 4. Error Handling Strategy
**Issue:** The autonomous error resolution has broad statements but lacks specific failure scenarios and recovery procedures.
**Recommendation:** Define specific scenarios:
- Container startup failures
- Service unavailability
- Resource exhaustion
- Network connectivity issues
- Include specific retry logic with exponential backoff
- Specify maximum retry counts and escalation procedures
That sounds good. I will defer that to you to define all of that using best common practices.
### 5. Security Requirements
**Issue:** Missing security best practices for Docker containers.
**Recommendation:** Include:
- Run containers as non-root users where possible
- Enable read-only filesystems where appropriate
- Implement security scanning during build process
- Define network policies for internal communication only
- Specify how to handle secrets securely (not just environment variables)
All of that sounds good. Secrets via environment variables is fine, as this is only a demo version of the stack. Once its fully working/validated (by you and by me) we will have a dedicated conversation to turn it into a production ready stack.
### 6. Environment Variables Management
**Issue:** Settings file is mentioned but doesn't specify how secrets should be handled differently from regular configuration.
**Recommendation:** Define:
- Separate handling for secrets vs configuration
- Use of Docker secrets for sensitive data
- Environment-specific configuration files
- Validation of required environment variables at startup
Since its a demo, lets keep it simple, everything in the one file please.
### 7. Dependency Management
**Issue:** No mention of how to handle dependencies between components in the right order.
**Recommendation:** Define:
- Explicit service dependencies in Docker Compose
- Service readiness checks before starting dependent services
- Proper startup order using `depends_on` with health checks
- Circular dependency detection and resolution
I agree that is needed. I accept your recommendation. Please define everything accordingly as you work.
### 8. Monitoring and Observability
**Issue:** Health checks are mentioned but need more specificity about metrics collection, logging standards, and alerting criteria.
**Recommendation:** Include:
- Centralized logging to a dedicated service or stdout
- Metrics collection intervals and formats
- Health check endpoint specifications
- Alerting thresholds and notification mechanisms
This is a demo stack. No need for that.
### 9. Version Management
**Issue:** No guidance on container image versioning strategy.
**Recommendation:** Specify:
- Use of pinned image tags rather than 'latest'
- Strategy for updating and patching images
- Rollback procedures for failed updates
- Image vulnerability scanning requirements
I agree with the pinned image tags rather than 'latest'
The rest, lets defer to the production stack implementation.
### 10. Performance Benchmarks
**Issue:** The "single user demo" requirement lacks specific performance metrics.
**Recommendation:** Define:
- Maximum acceptable response times (e.g., <2s for homepage)
- Concurrent connection limits
- Throughput expectations (requests per second)
- Resource utilization thresholds before triggering alerts
I defer to your expertise. This is meant for single user demo use. Use your best judgment.
### 11. Configuration Management
**Issue:** No clear separation between required vs optional configuration parameters.
**Recommendation:** Define:
- Required vs optional environment variables
- Default values for optional parameters
- Configuration validation at runtime
- Configuration change procedures without service restart
The minium viable needed for a demo/proof of concept for now.
Defer the rest until we work on the production stack please.
### 12. Rollback and Recovery Procedures
**Issue:** Autonomous error resolution is mentioned, but recovery procedures for failed components are not detailed.
**Recommendation:** Specify:
- How to handle partial failures
- Data consistency procedures
- Automated rollback triggers
- Manual override procedures for critical situations
Handle what you can. If you can't handle something after a few tries, flag it in collab/SupportStack/HUMANHELP.md and move on.
Also keep a running status report in collab/SupportStack/STATUS.md
Use git commit heavily.
Push whenever you have a component fully working/tested/validated.
### 13. Cleanup and Teardown
**Issue:** The control script includes uninstall but doesn't specify what "uninstall" means in terms of cleaning up volumes, networks, and other Docker resources.
**Recommendation:** Define:
- Complete removal of all containers, volumes, and networks
- Cleanup of temporary files and logs
- Verification of complete cleanup
- Handling of orphaned resources
Yes all of that is needed.
### 14. Documentation Requirements
**Issue:** The prompt mentions documentation files but doesn't specify what documentation should be created for each component.
**Recommendation:** Include requirements for:
- Component architecture diagrams
- Service configuration guides
- Troubleshooting guides
- Startup/shutdown procedures
- Monitoring and health check explanations
Defer that to production. For now, we just want the MVP and then the full stack POC/demo.
## Priority Actions
1. **High Priority:** Resource constraints, security requirements, and homepage integration specifications
2. **Medium Priority:** Error handling, testing methodology, and dependency management
3. **Lower Priority:** Documentation requirements and version management (though important for production)
## Conclusion
The prompt has a solid foundation but needs these clarifications to ensure the implementation will be truly autonomous, secure, and reliable for the intended use case. Addressing these issues will result in a much more robust and maintainable solution.
For everything that I've said to defer, please track those items in collab/SupportStack/ProdRoadmap.md (make it beautiful with table of contents, headers, tables, icons etc).
I defer to your prompt engineering expertise to update the prompt as needed to capture all of my answers.

74
collab/SupportStack/STATUS.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
# 📊 TSYSDevStack Development Status
**Project:** TSYSDevStack SupportStack Demo
**Last Updated:** October 28, 2025
**Status:** In Progress
## 🎯 Current Focus
MVP Development: docker-socket-proxy, homepage, wakaapi
## 📈 Progress Overview
- **Overall Status:** Active Development
- **Components Planned:** 3 (MVP: docker-socket-proxy, homepage, wakaapi)
- **Components Completed:** 0
- **Components In Progress:** 0
- **Components Remaining:** 3
## 🔄 Component Status
### MVP Components
| Component | Status | Health Checks | Tests | Integration | Notes |
|-----------|--------|---------------|-------|-------------|-------|
| docker-socket-proxy | 📋 Planned | N/A | N/A | N/A | First component in sequence |
| homepage | 📋 Planned | N/A | N/A | N/A | Requires docker-socket-proxy |
| wakaapi | 📋 Planned | N/A | N/A | N/A | Requires homepage integration |
### Legend
- 📋 **Planned**: Scheduled for development
- 🔄 **In Progress**: Currently being developed
- ✅ **Completed**: Fully implemented and tested
- ⏳ **On Hold**: Waiting for dependencies or human input
- ❌ **Failed**: Encountered issues requiring review
## 📅 Development Timeline
- **Started:** October 28, 2025
- **Estimated Completion:** TBD
- **Major Milestones:**
- [ ] MVP Components (docker-socket-proxy, homepage, wakaapi) completed and integrated
- [ ] Full test suite passing (>75% coverage)
- [ ] Production roadmap implementation
## 🧪 Testing Status
- **Unit Tests:** Not yet implemented
- **Integration Tests:** Not yet implemented
- **End-to-End Tests:** Not yet implemented
- **Coverage:** 0%
- **Last Test Run:** N/A
## 💻 Technical Status
- **Environment:** Local demo environment
- **Configuration File:** TSYSDevStack-SupportStack-Demo-Settings (to be created)
- **Control Script:** TSYSDevStack-SupportStack-Demo-Control.sh (to be created)
- **Docker Compose Files:** None created yet
- **Resource Limits:** Not yet implemented
## ⚠️ Current Issues
- No current blocking issues
## 🚀 Next Steps
1. Implement docker-socket-proxy component
2. Configure for homepage integration
3. Implement comprehensive health checks
4. Write and execute tests
5. Validate component meets Definition of Done
6. Proceed to homepage component
## 📈 Performance Metrics
- **Response Time:** Not yet measured
- **Resource Utilization:** Not yet measured
- **Uptime:** Not yet applicable
## 🔄 Last Git Commit
- **Commit Hash:** Not yet committed
- **Message:** Initial project setup
- **Date:** October 28, 2025