Files
SITER-Solar/v2-siter-solar-plan.md
Charles N Wyble 400764a9ff feat: initial project setup with bash-based NREL analysis
- Add bash script (siter-solar-analysis.sh) for NREL PVWatts API
- Add BATS test suite with 19 tests (all passing)
- Add Docker test environment with shellcheck, bats, curl, jq, bc
- Add pre-commit hooks enforcing SDLC rules
- Mark Python scripts as deprecated (kept for reference)
- Add comprehensive README.md and AGENTS.md documentation
- Add .env.example for configuration template
- Add .gitignore excluding private data (base-bill/, .env)
- Add SVG diagrams for presentation
- Redact all private location data (use SITER placeholder)

All work done following SDLC: Docker-only development, TDD approach,
conventional commits, code/docs/tests synchronized.

Generated with Crush

Assisted-by: GLM-5 via Crush <crush@charm.land>
2026-02-27 16:45:41 -05:00

24 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

SITER Solar Installation Project

2026 Renewable Energy Initiative - v2 Analysis


Executive Summary

This document outlines a solar energy installation project for SITER, designed to offset a portion of monthly electricity costs through solar generation. The system will utilize 16 solar panels across 8 custom-built ground-mount racks, paired with a Sol-Ark 5K hybrid inverter that integrates with the existing Base Power battery backup system.

Total Project Investment: $4,100.00 Estimated ROI Period: 9.1 years (based on updated billing analysis) Estimated Monthly Savings: $37.61 (14.2% bill offset)

Existing Infrastructure: SITER currently operates with a Base Power battery backup system and automatic transfer switch (ATS), installed in 2025, providing resilience and a fixed energy rate of $0.085/kWh through a 3-year contract (Oct 2025 - Oct 2028).

Updated Billing Data (15 months): Average monthly consumption of 1,885 kWh (~22,600 kWh/year) at average effective rate of $0.140/kWh.

NREL PVWatts Analysis: Based on location data for SITER, a 16-panel system (4.0 kW DC with 250W panels) is projected to produce ~6,000 kWh/year, offsetting approximately 14% of current consumption.


Table of Contents

  1. Project Overview
  2. Technical Specifications
  3. Detailed Budget
  4. Project Timeline
  5. Risk Analysis
  6. Return on Investment Analysis
  7. Recommendations
  8. Appendix

Project Overview

Objectives

  • Reduce monthly electricity expenses through solar generation (~14% offset with current panels)
  • Integrate with existing Base Power battery backup infrastructure
  • Leverage Base Power's 4¢/kWh solar buyback program for excess production
  • Complete installation with minimal upfront capital expenditure
  • Achieve positive ROI within 10 years while gaining energy resilience

Scope

Component Quantity Description
Solar Panels 16 Existing inventory (250W each)
Ground-Mount Racks 8 Custom steel construction
Inverter 1 Sol-Ark 5K Hybrid
Wiring & Connectors TBD To be determined based on site layout

Current Status

  • Phase: Initial procurement and rack construction
  • Spend to Date: $360.95 (first solar rack completed)
  • Next Milestone: Complete remaining 7 racks

Existing Infrastructure

SITER has the following energy infrastructure already in place:

Component Details Install Date
Base Power Battery System Battery backup with automatic transfer switch 2024
Automatic Transfer Switch (ATS) Seamless grid/battery switching 2024
Base Power Contract 3-year fixed rate at $0.085/kWh 2025-2028

Site Base Load: ~1,885 kWh/month (15-month average)

This existing infrastructure significantly de-risks the solar project:

  • ATS already installed for grid switching
  • Battery backup provides load smoothing and outage protection
  • Fixed-rate contract provides predictable baseline costs

Technical Specifications

Inverter: Sol-Ark 5K-5kW-48V Single-Phase Hybrid

Specification Value
Power Output 5kW
System Voltage 48V DC
Phase Single Phase
Type Hybrid (Grid-tied + Battery Backup)
Source EcoDirect

Key Benefits:

  • Grid-tied operation for net metering eligibility
  • Integrates with existing Base Power battery system
  • Hybrid functionality ensures power during grid outages
  • High efficiency rating minimizes energy loss
  • Compatible with existing ATS infrastructure

Existing Base Power System

Specification Value
Contract Rate $0.085/kWh (fixed through Oct 2028)
Solar Buyback Rate $0.04/kWh (4¢/kWh)
Contract Term 3 years (Oct 2025 - Oct 2028)
Site Base Load ~1,885 kWh/month (actual 15-month average)
Backup Capability Automatic transfer switch + battery
Installation Date 2024
Solar Integration Seamless - no additional equipment needed

Source: Base Power Solar Integration

Solar Buyback Program Details

Base Power offers competitive solar buyback rates for excess production:

Feature Details
Buyback Rate 4¢/kWh for all excess solar production
Credit Application Applies to entire bill (not just energy charge)
Negative Balance Rolls over to following month
Solar Tracking Shown on monthly bill in "Solar Credits" section
Outage Protection Base keeps solar panels producing during grid outages

Integration Strategy: Solar generation will first offset on-site consumption (reducing the $0.085/kWh charge), with excess production credited at $0.04/kWh. The existing Base Power battery system provides:

  • Automatic solar integration without additional equipment
  • Continued solar operation during grid outages
  • Battery storage for excess daytime production

image-1-placeholder

Rack System: Ground-Mount Steel Construction

Each rack accommodates 2 solar panels using galvanized steel posts and adjustable mounting hardware.

Materials per Rack:

  • 6x 8' steel posts (driven into ground)
  • 14x 5/16" x 5-3/8" U-bolts (panel mounting)
  • 3x 2-3/8" Galvanized Adjustable Clamps (structural support)

image-5-placeholder


Detailed Budget

Phase 1: Equipment & Materials

1.1 Panel Rack Construction

Line Item Qty Unit Cost Subtotal Notes
8' Steel Posts 48 $34.97 $1,678.56 6 posts per rack × 8 racks
5/16" x 5-3/8" U-bolts 112 $2.33 $260.96 14 per rack × 8 racks
2-3/8" Galv Adj. Clamps 24 $3.77 $90.48 3 per rack × 8 racks
Rack Materials Subtotal $2,030.00

1.2 Tools & Equipment (One-Time)

Line Item Qty Unit Cost Subtotal Notes
Post Driver 1 $57.75 $57.75 Reusable for future projects
Tools Subtotal $57.75

1.3 Electrical Components

Line Item Est. Cost Notes
Romex Wiring $200.00 Gauge/length TBD based on site survey
Connectors & Junction Boxes $112.25 MC4 connectors, conduit, etc.
Electrical Subtotal $312.25 Conservative estimate

1.4 Inverter

Line Item Qty Unit Cost Subtotal Notes
Sol-Ark 5K Hybrid Inverter 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 Includes shipping
Inverter Subtotal $1,500.00

Budget Summary

Category Amount % of Total
Rack Materials $2,030.00 49.5%
Tools (One-Time) $57.75 1.4%
Electrical Components $312.25 7.6%
Inverter $1,500.00 36.6%
Contingency Reserve (10%) $200.00 4.9%
TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET $4,100.00 100%

Spend to Date

Date Item Amount Running Total
2026 First Solar Rack (materials) $360.95 $360.95
Remaining Budget $3,739.05

Cost Comparison: Per-Rack Analysis

Cost Element Per Rack 8 Racks Total
Steel Posts $209.82 $1,678.56
U-bolts $45.92 $367.36
Adjustable Clamps $11.31 $90.48
Base Rack Cost $267.05 $2,136.40
Wiring/Connectors (est.) $32.95 $263.60
All-In Rack Cost $301.08 $2,400.00

Project Timeline

Phase Overview

Week 1-2:  [████████] Procurement & Site Prep
Week 3-6:  [████████████████████████████████] Rack Construction
Week 7-8:  [████████████] Inverter Installation
Week 9:    [████] Electrical Wiring
Week 10:   [████] Testing & Commissioning

Detailed Schedule

Phase Tasks Duration Dependencies
1. Procurement Order inverter, purchase remaining steel posts, hardware, wiring 1-2 weeks Budget approval
2. Site Preparation Mark rack locations, clear vegetation if needed 1 week Phase 1
3. Rack Construction Build 7 remaining racks (1 already complete) 3-4 weeks Phase 2
4. Panel Mounting Install panels on completed racks 1 week Phase 3
5. Inverter Installation Mount inverter, connect to panel array 1 week Phase 4
6. Electrical Integration Run wiring, install disconnects, connect to building 1 week Phase 5
7. Testing & Commissioning System testing, safety inspection, energize 1 week Phase 6

Estimated Total Duration: 8-10 weeks

Milestones

  • M1: All materials procured
  • M2: Site preparation complete
  • M3: All 8 racks constructed
  • M4: Panels mounted and secured
  • M5: Inverter installed and connected
  • M6: System commissioned and operational

Risk Analysis

Risk Register

ID Risk Description Probability Impact Risk Score Mitigation Strategy
R1 Wiring costs exceed estimates Medium Medium 6 Obtain quotes from 2-3 suppliers; consider DIY installation
R2 Weather delays rack construction Medium Low 4 Build buffer into timeline; work during favorable seasons
R3 Inverter supply chain delays Low High 5 Order early; confirm stock before project start
R4 Structural issues with racks Low Medium 3 Follow engineering best practices; inspect posts regularly
R5 Utility interconnection delays Low Medium 3 Research local requirements early; submit paperwork promptly
R6 Permit requirements Medium Medium 6 Verify local building codes before construction
R7 Panel compatibility issues Low Low 2 Confirm panel specs match inverter requirements
R8 ROI takes longer than projected Low Medium 3 Conservative savings estimates; monitor actual output

Risk Matrix

                    IMPACT
              Low      Medium      High
         ┌─────────┬─────────┬─────────┐
    High │         │    R6   │         │
PROB     ├─────────┼─────────┼─────────┤
   Medium│    R2   │  R1,R8  │         │
         ├─────────┼─────────┼─────────┤
      Low│    R7   │  R4,R5  │  R3     │
         └─────────┴─────────┴─────────┘

Key Risk Mitigations

R1: Wiring Cost Overrun

  • Current Status: Only rough estimates completed
  • Action Items:
    • Conduct site survey to determine exact wire runs
    • Obtain quotes from multiple electrical suppliers
    • Consider aluminum conductors for long runs (cost savings)
    • Allocate $200 contingency specifically for electrical

R6: Permit Requirements

  • Current Status: Unknown
  • Action Items:
    • Contact local building department
    • Research setback requirements for ground-mount systems
    • Verify utility interconnection requirements
    • Factor permit fees into budget if required

Return on Investment Analysis

Updated Billing Analysis (15 Months of Data)

Based on actual Base Power billing data from October 2024 through January 2026:

Service Period Consumption (kWh) Bill Amount Effective Rate
Oct 18 - Nov 19, 2024 1,368 $34.61 $0.025/kWh*
Nov 19 - Dec 18, 2024 863 $132.37 $0.153/kWh
Dec 18, 2024 - Jan 17, 2025 1,092 $160.33 $0.147/kWh
Jan 17 - Feb 19, 2025 1,434 $210.73 $0.147/kWh
Feb 19 - Mar 21, 2025 1,398 $199.35 $0.143/kWh
Mar 21 - Apr 22, 2025 1,472 $209.71 $0.143/kWh
Apr 22 - May 21, 2025 1,936 $277.13 $0.143/kWh
May 21 - Jun 20, 2025 2,713 $385.08 $0.142/kWh
Jun 20 - Jul 22, 2025 2,995 $423.56 $0.141/kWh
Jul 22 - Aug 20, 2025 3,015 $428.76 $0.142/kWh
Aug 20 - Sep 19, 2025 2,924 $440.35 $0.151/kWh
Sep 19 - Oct 20, 2025 2,486 $372.89 $0.150/kWh
Oct 20 - Nov 18, 2025 1,553 $235.81 $0.152/kWh
Nov 18 - Dec 18, 2025 1,469 $240.12 $0.163/kWh
Dec 18, 2025 - Jan 20, 2026 1,549 $216.25 $0.140/kWh
15-Month Average 1,885 $264.47 $0.140/kWh

*Note: Oct-Nov 2024 bill had credit applied from previous provider transition

Seasonal Consumption Patterns

Season Months Avg Consumption Avg Bill
Summer Peak Jun - Sep 2,912 kWh $415.89
Winter Low Nov - Feb 1,333 kWh $175.56
Shoulder Mar - May, Oct 1,777 kWh $261.55

Key Insight: Summer consumption is 2.2× higher than winter, creating opportunity for solar to offset peak production months.

NREL PVWatts Production Estimate

Based on NREL PVWatts analysis for SITER:

Parameter Value
System Capacity 4.0 kW DC (16 × 250W panels)
Array Type Fixed Open Rack (Ground Mount)
Orientation 30° tilt, 180° azimuth (South)
Annual Production 6,004 kWh
Monthly Average 500 kWh
Daily Average 16 kWh
Capacity Factor 17.1%
Avg Solar Radiation 5.52 kWh/m²/day

Ground Mount Advantages at SITER

The ground-mount configuration at this site has significant advantages:

Advantage Impact
Optimal Tilt (30°) Matches latitude for maximum annual production
South-Facing (180°) Optimal azimuth for Texas
No Trees/Shading Minimal shading losses (typical: 3-5%, this site: <1%)
Open Rack Better airflow = cooler panels = higher efficiency
Adjustable Orientation Can fine-tune tilt seasonally if desired

Optimized Production Estimate (8% losses vs 14% standard):

Scenario Losses Annual kWh Monthly $ Payback
Conservative (NREL default) 14% 6,004 $37.61 9.1 yrs
Optimized (no shade) 8% ~6,500 ~$41 ~8.3 yrs

The site's open exposure and ground-mount flexibility make it an ideal solar location.

Monthly Production Profile (NREL)

Month AC Output (kWh) Daily Avg Solar Rad (kWh/m²/day)
Jan 450 15 4.58
Feb 453 15 5.15
Mar 492 16 5.23
Apr 508 17 5.61
May 534 18 5.87
Jun 514 17 5.94
Jul 555 18 6.31
Aug 571 19 6.57
Sep 514 17 6.01
Oct 516 17 5.62
Nov 469 15 4.99
Dec 429 14 4.39
Annual 6,004 16 5.52

image-2-placeholder

Investment Summary (Updated)

Metric Value
Total Project Cost $4,100.00
Average Monthly Bill (15-mo actual) $264.47
Site Avg Consumption 1,885 kWh/month (22,614 kWh/year)
Solar Production (NREL) 6,004 kWh/year (500 kWh/month)
Self-Sufficiency 26.6%
Base Power Energy Rate $0.085/kWh
Base Power Export Rate $0.04/kWh

Financial Analysis (Updated)

Category kWh/year Rate Annual Value
Self-Consumed (60%) 3,602 $0.085/kWh $306.18
Exported to Grid (40%) 2,401 $0.04/kWh $96.06
Total Annual Value 6,004 $402.24
Monthly Savings $33.52

ROI Summary (Updated)

Metric Value
Monthly Savings $33.52
Bill Offset 12.7% (of $264.47 avg bill)
Payback Period 10.2 years (122 months)

System Size Scenarios (NREL Analysis)

System kW kWh/yr $/mo Offset Payback
16 × 250W (current) 4.0 6,004 $33.52 12.7% 10.2 yrs
16 × 300W 4.8 7,204 $40.22 15.2% 8.5 yrs
16 × 350W 5.6 8,405 $46.93 17.8% 7.3 yrs
16 × 400W 6.4 9,606 $53.63 20.3% 6.4 yrs
16 × 450W 7.2 10,806 $60.34 22.8% 5.7 yrs
20 × 400W (expanded) 8.0 12,007 $67.04 25.4% 5.1 yrs
24 × 400W 9.6 14,409 $80.45 30.4% 4.2 yrs

image-4-placeholder

Note: To achieve 100% bill offset would require ~32 kW (80 panels @ 400W each).

10-Year Financial Projection (Current System: 16 × 250W)

Year Cumulative Savings Net Position
0 $0 -$4,100.00
1 $402.24 -$3,697.76
2 $804.48 -$3,295.52
3 $1,206.72 -$2,893.28
4 $1,608.97 -$2,491.03
5 $2,011.21 -$2,088.79
6 $2,413.45 -$1,686.55
7 $2,815.69 -$1,284.31
8 $3,217.93 -$882.07
9 $3,620.17 -$479.83
10 $4,022.41 -$77.59
11 $4,424.65 +$324.65

image-3-placeholder

Assumptions

  • NREL PVWatts production estimates based on TMY (Typical Meteorological Year) data
  • 60% self-consumption / 40% export split (conservative estimate)
  • System losses of 14% (inverter, wiring, soiling, etc.)
  • Electricity rates remain constant (conservative - rates typically increase 2-3% annually)
  • No major maintenance required in first 10 years
  • Base Power contract at $0.085/kWh remains in effect through Oct 2028
  • Base Power solar buyback at $0.04/kWh continues
  • Solar integration with Base Power system is technically feasible

Key Considerations

Production vs. Consumption Gap:

  • Current consumption: ~22,600 kWh/year
  • Solar production: ~6,000 kWh/year
  • Gap: ~16,600 kWh/year (73% still from grid/Base Power)

Options to Improve Economics:

  1. Upgrade to higher-wattage panels (400W+ panels reduce payback to ~6 years)
  2. Expand system size (additional panels/racks)
  3. Reduce consumption through efficiency measures
  4. Add more panels when costs decrease

Value Adds Not Quantified

  • Energy Independence: Already partially achieved via Base Power; solar adds generation capability
  • Property Value: Solar installations typically increase property value
  • Environmental Impact: Reduced carbon footprint
  • Existing Battery Storage: Already in place via Base Power system
  • Rate Hedge: Protection against future electricity rate increases post-2028
  • Redundancy: Solar + Base Power + Grid provides triple-redundant power architecture

Recommendations

Immediate Actions

  1. Approve Budget: Authorize $4,100 project expenditure
  2. Order Inverter: Confirm Sol-Ark 5K availability and place order
  3. Complete Site Survey: Determine exact wiring requirements and costs
  4. Verify Permits: Contact local building department to confirm requirements

Panel Upgrade Consideration

Based on the updated analysis, upgrading from 250W to 400W panels would:

  • Increase production from 6,004 to 9,606 kWh/year (+60%)
  • Increase monthly savings from $33.52 to $53.63
  • Reduce payback from 10.2 years to 6.4 years
  • Increase bill offset from 12.7% to 20.3%

Recommendation: If budget allows, consider sourcing 400W panels instead of using existing 250W inventory.

Project Execution

  1. Continue rack construction using proven design from Rack #1
  2. Procure all remaining materials in single order for cost efficiency
  3. Consider hiring licensed electrician for final grid connection
  4. Document entire process for future reference/expansion

Future Considerations

  • Base Power Contract Renewal (2028): Evaluate contract terms vs. solar-only operation
  • Panel Expansion: Inverter can handle additional capacity if needed
  • Monitoring: Add production monitoring system for performance tracking
  • Grid Export: Explore net metering options for excess generation

Appendix

A. Vendor Information

Inverter Supplier:

B. Bill of Materials

Item Specification Qty Needed Unit Cost Total
Steel Posts 8' galvanized 48 $34.97 $1,678.56
U-bolts 5/16" x 5-3/8" 112 $2.33 $260.96
Adjustable Clamps 2-3/8" galvanized 24 $3.77 $90.48
Post Driver Manual 1 $57.75 $57.75
Hybrid Inverter Sol-Ark 5K 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
Wiring/Connectors TBD - - $312.25
TOTAL $3,900.00

Note: $200 contingency brings total to $4,100.00

C. Rack Construction Details

Standard Rack Assembly (Per Rack):

  1. Drive 6 steel posts into ground in 2 rows of 3
  2. Connect posts with horizontal rails using adjustable clamps
  3. Secure panel mounting rails with U-bolts
  4. Mount 2 solar panels per rack
  5. Route wiring through protective conduit

Completed: 1 of 8 racks ($360.95 invested)

D. Base Power Billing Details

Contract Information:

  • Contract #: SITER (renewed Oct 2025)
  • Contract ID: SITER
  • Provider: Base Power Company (PUCT License #10338)
  • Address: 1606 Headway Cir, Ste 9333, Austin, TX 78754
  • Support: 1-866-479-POWR (7697)

Rate Structure:

  • Energy Charge: $0.085/kWh (Oct 2025 - Oct 2028)
  • Previous Rate: $0.090/kWh (Oct 2024 - Oct 2025)
  • Utility Delivery (Oncor): Pass-through charges (~$0.056/kWh equivalent)
  • Base Subscription Fee: $10.00/month
  • Taxes: ~3.7% (SITER rates)

Meter Data:

  • Consumption Meter #: SITER
  • Generation Meter #: SITER (dual-purpose)
  • Reads: Actual (not estimated)
  • Tracks both Generation (solar/battery) and Consumption

E. Base Power Integration Notes

Technical Considerations:

  • Verify Sol-Ark 5K compatibility with existing Base Power ATS
  • Confirm DC voltage alignment between solar array and Base Power battery system
  • Determine optimal AC coupling configuration
  • Review interconnection requirements with Base Power

Contract Considerations:

  • Review Base Power contract for solar integration provisions
  • Confirm no penalties for reduced consumption
  • Plan for contract renewal negotiations in Oct 2028

Base Power Solar Economics

Consumption Offset vs. Export Credit:

Scenario Rate Benefit
Solar consumed on-site $0.085/kWh avoided Higher value - reduces energy charge
Solar exported to grid $0.04/kWh credit Lower value - but credits apply to entire bill

Optimal Strategy: Maximize self-consumption during peak production hours (run high-load appliances when solar is generating) to capture the $0.085/kWh value rather than exporting at $0.04/kWh.

Key Advantage: Unlike many providers that only credit against energy charges, Base applies solar credits to the entire bill including delivery fees, taxes, and the $10/month subscription fee.

F. Document History

Version Date Author Changes
1.0 February 2026 SITER Initial project documentation
1.1 February 2026 SITER Added Base Power infrastructure details
1.2 February 2026 SITER Updated with actual billing data (5 months)
2.0 February 2026 SITER Updated with complete billing data (15 months), revised consumption averages, seasonal analysis

Document prepared for SITER Board Review Project Start Date: 2026 Target Completion: Q2 2026