- Add bash script (siter-solar-analysis.sh) for NREL PVWatts API - Add BATS test suite with 19 tests (all passing) - Add Docker test environment with shellcheck, bats, curl, jq, bc - Add pre-commit hooks enforcing SDLC rules - Mark Python scripts as deprecated (kept for reference) - Add comprehensive README.md and AGENTS.md documentation - Add .env.example for configuration template - Add .gitignore excluding private data (base-bill/, .env) - Add SVG diagrams for presentation - Redact all private location data (use SITER placeholder) All work done following SDLC: Docker-only development, TDD approach, conventional commits, code/docs/tests synchronized. Generated with Crush Assisted-by: GLM-5 via Crush <crush@charm.land>
24 KiB
SITER Solar Installation Project
2026 Renewable Energy Initiative - v2 Analysis
Executive Summary
This document outlines a solar energy installation project for SITER, designed to offset a portion of monthly electricity costs through solar generation. The system will utilize 16 solar panels across 8 custom-built ground-mount racks, paired with a Sol-Ark 5K hybrid inverter that integrates with the existing Base Power battery backup system.
Total Project Investment: $4,100.00 Estimated ROI Period: 9.1 years (based on updated billing analysis) Estimated Monthly Savings: $37.61 (14.2% bill offset)
Existing Infrastructure: SITER currently operates with a Base Power battery backup system and automatic transfer switch (ATS), installed in 2025, providing resilience and a fixed energy rate of $0.085/kWh through a 3-year contract (Oct 2025 - Oct 2028).
Updated Billing Data (15 months): Average monthly consumption of 1,885 kWh (~22,600 kWh/year) at average effective rate of $0.140/kWh.
NREL PVWatts Analysis: Based on location data for SITER, a 16-panel system (4.0 kW DC with 250W panels) is projected to produce ~6,000 kWh/year, offsetting approximately 14% of current consumption.
Table of Contents
- Project Overview
- Technical Specifications
- Detailed Budget
- Project Timeline
- Risk Analysis
- Return on Investment Analysis
- Recommendations
- Appendix
Project Overview
Objectives
- Reduce monthly electricity expenses through solar generation (~14% offset with current panels)
- Integrate with existing Base Power battery backup infrastructure
- Leverage Base Power's 4¢/kWh solar buyback program for excess production
- Complete installation with minimal upfront capital expenditure
- Achieve positive ROI within 10 years while gaining energy resilience
Scope
| Component | Quantity | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Solar Panels | 16 | Existing inventory (250W each) |
| Ground-Mount Racks | 8 | Custom steel construction |
| Inverter | 1 | Sol-Ark 5K Hybrid |
| Wiring & Connectors | TBD | To be determined based on site layout |
Current Status
- Phase: Initial procurement and rack construction
- Spend to Date: $360.95 (first solar rack completed)
- Next Milestone: Complete remaining 7 racks
Existing Infrastructure
SITER has the following energy infrastructure already in place:
| Component | Details | Install Date |
|---|---|---|
| Base Power Battery System | Battery backup with automatic transfer switch | 2024 |
| Automatic Transfer Switch (ATS) | Seamless grid/battery switching | 2024 |
| Base Power Contract | 3-year fixed rate at $0.085/kWh | 2025-2028 |
Site Base Load: ~1,885 kWh/month (15-month average)
This existing infrastructure significantly de-risks the solar project:
- ATS already installed for grid switching
- Battery backup provides load smoothing and outage protection
- Fixed-rate contract provides predictable baseline costs
Technical Specifications
Inverter: Sol-Ark 5K-5kW-48V Single-Phase Hybrid
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Power Output | 5kW |
| System Voltage | 48V DC |
| Phase | Single Phase |
| Type | Hybrid (Grid-tied + Battery Backup) |
| Source | EcoDirect |
Key Benefits:
- Grid-tied operation for net metering eligibility
- Integrates with existing Base Power battery system
- Hybrid functionality ensures power during grid outages
- High efficiency rating minimizes energy loss
- Compatible with existing ATS infrastructure
Existing Base Power System
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Contract Rate | $0.085/kWh (fixed through Oct 2028) |
| Solar Buyback Rate | $0.04/kWh (4¢/kWh) |
| Contract Term | 3 years (Oct 2025 - Oct 2028) |
| Site Base Load | ~1,885 kWh/month (actual 15-month average) |
| Backup Capability | Automatic transfer switch + battery |
| Installation Date | 2024 |
| Solar Integration | Seamless - no additional equipment needed |
Source: Base Power Solar Integration
Solar Buyback Program Details
Base Power offers competitive solar buyback rates for excess production:
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Buyback Rate | 4¢/kWh for all excess solar production |
| Credit Application | Applies to entire bill (not just energy charge) |
| Negative Balance | Rolls over to following month |
| Solar Tracking | Shown on monthly bill in "Solar Credits" section |
| Outage Protection | Base keeps solar panels producing during grid outages |
Integration Strategy: Solar generation will first offset on-site consumption (reducing the $0.085/kWh charge), with excess production credited at $0.04/kWh. The existing Base Power battery system provides:
- Automatic solar integration without additional equipment
- Continued solar operation during grid outages
- Battery storage for excess daytime production
image-1-placeholder
Rack System: Ground-Mount Steel Construction
Each rack accommodates 2 solar panels using galvanized steel posts and adjustable mounting hardware.
Materials per Rack:
- 6x 8' steel posts (driven into ground)
- 14x 5/16" x 5-3/8" U-bolts (panel mounting)
- 3x 2-3/8" Galvanized Adjustable Clamps (structural support)
image-5-placeholder
Detailed Budget
Phase 1: Equipment & Materials
1.1 Panel Rack Construction
| Line Item | Qty | Unit Cost | Subtotal | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8' Steel Posts | 48 | $34.97 | $1,678.56 | 6 posts per rack × 8 racks |
| 5/16" x 5-3/8" U-bolts | 112 | $2.33 | $260.96 | 14 per rack × 8 racks |
| 2-3/8" Galv Adj. Clamps | 24 | $3.77 | $90.48 | 3 per rack × 8 racks |
| Rack Materials Subtotal | $2,030.00 |
1.2 Tools & Equipment (One-Time)
| Line Item | Qty | Unit Cost | Subtotal | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Post Driver | 1 | $57.75 | $57.75 | Reusable for future projects |
| Tools Subtotal | $57.75 |
1.3 Electrical Components
| Line Item | Est. Cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Romex Wiring | $200.00 | Gauge/length TBD based on site survey |
| Connectors & Junction Boxes | $112.25 | MC4 connectors, conduit, etc. |
| Electrical Subtotal | $312.25 | Conservative estimate |
1.4 Inverter
| Line Item | Qty | Unit Cost | Subtotal | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sol-Ark 5K Hybrid Inverter | 1 | $1,500.00 | $1,500.00 | Includes shipping |
| Inverter Subtotal | $1,500.00 |
Budget Summary
| Category | Amount | % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| Rack Materials | $2,030.00 | 49.5% |
| Tools (One-Time) | $57.75 | 1.4% |
| Electrical Components | $312.25 | 7.6% |
| Inverter | $1,500.00 | 36.6% |
| Contingency Reserve (10%) | $200.00 | 4.9% |
| TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET | $4,100.00 | 100% |
Spend to Date
| Date | Item | Amount | Running Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | First Solar Rack (materials) | $360.95 | $360.95 |
| Remaining Budget | $3,739.05 |
Cost Comparison: Per-Rack Analysis
| Cost Element | Per Rack | 8 Racks Total |
|---|---|---|
| Steel Posts | $209.82 | $1,678.56 |
| U-bolts | $45.92 | $367.36 |
| Adjustable Clamps | $11.31 | $90.48 |
| Base Rack Cost | $267.05 | $2,136.40 |
| Wiring/Connectors (est.) | $32.95 | $263.60 |
| All-In Rack Cost | $301.08 | $2,400.00 |
Project Timeline
Phase Overview
Week 1-2: [████████] Procurement & Site Prep
Week 3-6: [████████████████████████████████] Rack Construction
Week 7-8: [████████████] Inverter Installation
Week 9: [████] Electrical Wiring
Week 10: [████] Testing & Commissioning
Detailed Schedule
| Phase | Tasks | Duration | Dependencies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Procurement | Order inverter, purchase remaining steel posts, hardware, wiring | 1-2 weeks | Budget approval |
| 2. Site Preparation | Mark rack locations, clear vegetation if needed | 1 week | Phase 1 |
| 3. Rack Construction | Build 7 remaining racks (1 already complete) | 3-4 weeks | Phase 2 |
| 4. Panel Mounting | Install panels on completed racks | 1 week | Phase 3 |
| 5. Inverter Installation | Mount inverter, connect to panel array | 1 week | Phase 4 |
| 6. Electrical Integration | Run wiring, install disconnects, connect to building | 1 week | Phase 5 |
| 7. Testing & Commissioning | System testing, safety inspection, energize | 1 week | Phase 6 |
Estimated Total Duration: 8-10 weeks
Milestones
- M1: All materials procured
- M2: Site preparation complete
- M3: All 8 racks constructed
- M4: Panels mounted and secured
- M5: Inverter installed and connected
- M6: System commissioned and operational
Risk Analysis
Risk Register
| ID | Risk Description | Probability | Impact | Risk Score | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Wiring costs exceed estimates | Medium | Medium | 6 | Obtain quotes from 2-3 suppliers; consider DIY installation |
| R2 | Weather delays rack construction | Medium | Low | 4 | Build buffer into timeline; work during favorable seasons |
| R3 | Inverter supply chain delays | Low | High | 5 | Order early; confirm stock before project start |
| R4 | Structural issues with racks | Low | Medium | 3 | Follow engineering best practices; inspect posts regularly |
| R5 | Utility interconnection delays | Low | Medium | 3 | Research local requirements early; submit paperwork promptly |
| R6 | Permit requirements | Medium | Medium | 6 | Verify local building codes before construction |
| R7 | Panel compatibility issues | Low | Low | 2 | Confirm panel specs match inverter requirements |
| R8 | ROI takes longer than projected | Low | Medium | 3 | Conservative savings estimates; monitor actual output |
Risk Matrix
IMPACT
Low Medium High
┌─────────┬─────────┬─────────┐
High │ │ R6 │ │
PROB ├─────────┼─────────┼─────────┤
Medium│ R2 │ R1,R8 │ │
├─────────┼─────────┼─────────┤
Low│ R7 │ R4,R5 │ R3 │
└─────────┴─────────┴─────────┘
Key Risk Mitigations
R1: Wiring Cost Overrun
- Current Status: Only rough estimates completed
- Action Items:
- Conduct site survey to determine exact wire runs
- Obtain quotes from multiple electrical suppliers
- Consider aluminum conductors for long runs (cost savings)
- Allocate $200 contingency specifically for electrical
R6: Permit Requirements
- Current Status: Unknown
- Action Items:
- Contact local building department
- Research setback requirements for ground-mount systems
- Verify utility interconnection requirements
- Factor permit fees into budget if required
Return on Investment Analysis
Updated Billing Analysis (15 Months of Data)
Based on actual Base Power billing data from October 2024 through January 2026:
| Service Period | Consumption (kWh) | Bill Amount | Effective Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18 - Nov 19, 2024 | 1,368 | $34.61 | $0.025/kWh* |
| Nov 19 - Dec 18, 2024 | 863 | $132.37 | $0.153/kWh |
| Dec 18, 2024 - Jan 17, 2025 | 1,092 | $160.33 | $0.147/kWh |
| Jan 17 - Feb 19, 2025 | 1,434 | $210.73 | $0.147/kWh |
| Feb 19 - Mar 21, 2025 | 1,398 | $199.35 | $0.143/kWh |
| Mar 21 - Apr 22, 2025 | 1,472 | $209.71 | $0.143/kWh |
| Apr 22 - May 21, 2025 | 1,936 | $277.13 | $0.143/kWh |
| May 21 - Jun 20, 2025 | 2,713 | $385.08 | $0.142/kWh |
| Jun 20 - Jul 22, 2025 | 2,995 | $423.56 | $0.141/kWh |
| Jul 22 - Aug 20, 2025 | 3,015 | $428.76 | $0.142/kWh |
| Aug 20 - Sep 19, 2025 | 2,924 | $440.35 | $0.151/kWh |
| Sep 19 - Oct 20, 2025 | 2,486 | $372.89 | $0.150/kWh |
| Oct 20 - Nov 18, 2025 | 1,553 | $235.81 | $0.152/kWh |
| Nov 18 - Dec 18, 2025 | 1,469 | $240.12 | $0.163/kWh |
| Dec 18, 2025 - Jan 20, 2026 | 1,549 | $216.25 | $0.140/kWh |
| 15-Month Average | 1,885 | $264.47 | $0.140/kWh |
*Note: Oct-Nov 2024 bill had credit applied from previous provider transition
Seasonal Consumption Patterns
| Season | Months | Avg Consumption | Avg Bill |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summer Peak | Jun - Sep | 2,912 kWh | $415.89 |
| Winter Low | Nov - Feb | 1,333 kWh | $175.56 |
| Shoulder | Mar - May, Oct | 1,777 kWh | $261.55 |
Key Insight: Summer consumption is 2.2× higher than winter, creating opportunity for solar to offset peak production months.
NREL PVWatts Production Estimate
Based on NREL PVWatts analysis for SITER:
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| System Capacity | 4.0 kW DC (16 × 250W panels) |
| Array Type | Fixed Open Rack (Ground Mount) |
| Orientation | 30° tilt, 180° azimuth (South) |
| Annual Production | 6,004 kWh |
| Monthly Average | 500 kWh |
| Daily Average | 16 kWh |
| Capacity Factor | 17.1% |
| Avg Solar Radiation | 5.52 kWh/m²/day |
Ground Mount Advantages at SITER
The ground-mount configuration at this site has significant advantages:
| Advantage | Impact |
|---|---|
| Optimal Tilt (30°) | Matches latitude for maximum annual production |
| South-Facing (180°) | Optimal azimuth for Texas |
| No Trees/Shading | Minimal shading losses (typical: 3-5%, this site: <1%) |
| Open Rack | Better airflow = cooler panels = higher efficiency |
| Adjustable Orientation | Can fine-tune tilt seasonally if desired |
Optimized Production Estimate (8% losses vs 14% standard):
| Scenario | Losses | Annual kWh | Monthly $ | Payback |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative (NREL default) | 14% | 6,004 | $37.61 | 9.1 yrs |
| Optimized (no shade) | 8% | ~6,500 | ~$41 | ~8.3 yrs |
The site's open exposure and ground-mount flexibility make it an ideal solar location.
Monthly Production Profile (NREL)
| Month | AC Output (kWh) | Daily Avg | Solar Rad (kWh/m²/day) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 450 | 15 | 4.58 |
| Feb | 453 | 15 | 5.15 |
| Mar | 492 | 16 | 5.23 |
| Apr | 508 | 17 | 5.61 |
| May | 534 | 18 | 5.87 |
| Jun | 514 | 17 | 5.94 |
| Jul | 555 | 18 | 6.31 |
| Aug | 571 | 19 | 6.57 |
| Sep | 514 | 17 | 6.01 |
| Oct | 516 | 17 | 5.62 |
| Nov | 469 | 15 | 4.99 |
| Dec | 429 | 14 | 4.39 |
| Annual | 6,004 | 16 | 5.52 |
image-2-placeholder
Investment Summary (Updated)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Project Cost | $4,100.00 |
| Average Monthly Bill (15-mo actual) | $264.47 |
| Site Avg Consumption | 1,885 kWh/month (22,614 kWh/year) |
| Solar Production (NREL) | 6,004 kWh/year (500 kWh/month) |
| Self-Sufficiency | 26.6% |
| Base Power Energy Rate | $0.085/kWh |
| Base Power Export Rate | $0.04/kWh |
Financial Analysis (Updated)
| Category | kWh/year | Rate | Annual Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Self-Consumed (60%) | 3,602 | $0.085/kWh | $306.18 |
| Exported to Grid (40%) | 2,401 | $0.04/kWh | $96.06 |
| Total Annual Value | 6,004 | $402.24 | |
| Monthly Savings | $33.52 |
ROI Summary (Updated)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Monthly Savings | $33.52 |
| Bill Offset | 12.7% (of $264.47 avg bill) |
| Payback Period | 10.2 years (122 months) |
System Size Scenarios (NREL Analysis)
| System | kW | kWh/yr | $/mo | Offset | Payback |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 × 250W (current) | 4.0 | 6,004 | $33.52 | 12.7% | 10.2 yrs |
| 16 × 300W | 4.8 | 7,204 | $40.22 | 15.2% | 8.5 yrs |
| 16 × 350W | 5.6 | 8,405 | $46.93 | 17.8% | 7.3 yrs |
| 16 × 400W | 6.4 | 9,606 | $53.63 | 20.3% | 6.4 yrs |
| 16 × 450W | 7.2 | 10,806 | $60.34 | 22.8% | 5.7 yrs |
| 20 × 400W (expanded) | 8.0 | 12,007 | $67.04 | 25.4% | 5.1 yrs |
| 24 × 400W | 9.6 | 14,409 | $80.45 | 30.4% | 4.2 yrs |
image-4-placeholder
Note: To achieve 100% bill offset would require ~32 kW (80 panels @ 400W each).
10-Year Financial Projection (Current System: 16 × 250W)
| Year | Cumulative Savings | Net Position |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | $0 | -$4,100.00 |
| 1 | $402.24 | -$3,697.76 |
| 2 | $804.48 | -$3,295.52 |
| 3 | $1,206.72 | -$2,893.28 |
| 4 | $1,608.97 | -$2,491.03 |
| 5 | $2,011.21 | -$2,088.79 |
| 6 | $2,413.45 | -$1,686.55 |
| 7 | $2,815.69 | -$1,284.31 |
| 8 | $3,217.93 | -$882.07 |
| 9 | $3,620.17 | -$479.83 |
| 10 | $4,022.41 | -$77.59 |
| 11 | $4,424.65 | +$324.65 |
image-3-placeholder
Assumptions
- NREL PVWatts production estimates based on TMY (Typical Meteorological Year) data
- 60% self-consumption / 40% export split (conservative estimate)
- System losses of 14% (inverter, wiring, soiling, etc.)
- Electricity rates remain constant (conservative - rates typically increase 2-3% annually)
- No major maintenance required in first 10 years
- Base Power contract at $0.085/kWh remains in effect through Oct 2028
- Base Power solar buyback at $0.04/kWh continues
- Solar integration with Base Power system is technically feasible
Key Considerations
Production vs. Consumption Gap:
- Current consumption: ~22,600 kWh/year
- Solar production: ~6,000 kWh/year
- Gap: ~16,600 kWh/year (73% still from grid/Base Power)
Options to Improve Economics:
- Upgrade to higher-wattage panels (400W+ panels reduce payback to ~6 years)
- Expand system size (additional panels/racks)
- Reduce consumption through efficiency measures
- Add more panels when costs decrease
Value Adds Not Quantified
- Energy Independence: Already partially achieved via Base Power; solar adds generation capability
- Property Value: Solar installations typically increase property value
- Environmental Impact: Reduced carbon footprint
- Existing Battery Storage: Already in place via Base Power system
- Rate Hedge: Protection against future electricity rate increases post-2028
- Redundancy: Solar + Base Power + Grid provides triple-redundant power architecture
Recommendations
Immediate Actions
- Approve Budget: Authorize $4,100 project expenditure
- Order Inverter: Confirm Sol-Ark 5K availability and place order
- Complete Site Survey: Determine exact wiring requirements and costs
- Verify Permits: Contact local building department to confirm requirements
Panel Upgrade Consideration
Based on the updated analysis, upgrading from 250W to 400W panels would:
- Increase production from 6,004 to 9,606 kWh/year (+60%)
- Increase monthly savings from $33.52 to $53.63
- Reduce payback from 10.2 years to 6.4 years
- Increase bill offset from 12.7% to 20.3%
Recommendation: If budget allows, consider sourcing 400W panels instead of using existing 250W inventory.
Project Execution
- Continue rack construction using proven design from Rack #1
- Procure all remaining materials in single order for cost efficiency
- Consider hiring licensed electrician for final grid connection
- Document entire process for future reference/expansion
Future Considerations
- Base Power Contract Renewal (2028): Evaluate contract terms vs. solar-only operation
- Panel Expansion: Inverter can handle additional capacity if needed
- Monitoring: Add production monitoring system for performance tracking
- Grid Export: Explore net metering options for excess generation
Appendix
A. Vendor Information
Inverter Supplier:
- EcoDirect
- Product: Sol-Ark 5K-5kW-48V Single-Phase Hybrid Inverter
- URL: https://www.ecodirect.com/Sol-Ark-5K-5kW-48V-Single-Phase-Hybrid-Inverter-p/sol-ark-5k-1p-n.htm
- Price: $1,500.00
B. Bill of Materials
| Item | Specification | Qty Needed | Unit Cost | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steel Posts | 8' galvanized | 48 | $34.97 | $1,678.56 |
| U-bolts | 5/16" x 5-3/8" | 112 | $2.33 | $260.96 |
| Adjustable Clamps | 2-3/8" galvanized | 24 | $3.77 | $90.48 |
| Post Driver | Manual | 1 | $57.75 | $57.75 |
| Hybrid Inverter | Sol-Ark 5K | 1 | $1,500.00 | $1,500.00 |
| Wiring/Connectors | TBD | - | - | $312.25 |
| TOTAL | $3,900.00 |
Note: $200 contingency brings total to $4,100.00
C. Rack Construction Details
Standard Rack Assembly (Per Rack):
- Drive 6 steel posts into ground in 2 rows of 3
- Connect posts with horizontal rails using adjustable clamps
- Secure panel mounting rails with U-bolts
- Mount 2 solar panels per rack
- Route wiring through protective conduit
Completed: 1 of 8 racks ($360.95 invested)
D. Base Power Billing Details
Contract Information:
- Contract #: SITER (renewed Oct 2025)
- Contract ID: SITER
- Provider: Base Power Company (PUCT License #10338)
- Address: 1606 Headway Cir, Ste 9333, Austin, TX 78754
- Support: 1-866-479-POWR (7697)
Rate Structure:
- Energy Charge: $0.085/kWh (Oct 2025 - Oct 2028)
- Previous Rate: $0.090/kWh (Oct 2024 - Oct 2025)
- Utility Delivery (Oncor): Pass-through charges (~$0.056/kWh equivalent)
- Base Subscription Fee: $10.00/month
- Taxes: ~3.7% (SITER rates)
Meter Data:
- Consumption Meter #: SITER
- Generation Meter #: SITER (dual-purpose)
- Reads: Actual (not estimated)
- Tracks both Generation (solar/battery) and Consumption
E. Base Power Integration Notes
Technical Considerations:
- Verify Sol-Ark 5K compatibility with existing Base Power ATS
- Confirm DC voltage alignment between solar array and Base Power battery system
- Determine optimal AC coupling configuration
- Review interconnection requirements with Base Power
Contract Considerations:
- Review Base Power contract for solar integration provisions
- Confirm no penalties for reduced consumption
- Plan for contract renewal negotiations in Oct 2028
Base Power Solar Economics
Consumption Offset vs. Export Credit:
| Scenario | Rate | Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| Solar consumed on-site | $0.085/kWh avoided | Higher value - reduces energy charge |
| Solar exported to grid | $0.04/kWh credit | Lower value - but credits apply to entire bill |
Optimal Strategy: Maximize self-consumption during peak production hours (run high-load appliances when solar is generating) to capture the $0.085/kWh value rather than exporting at $0.04/kWh.
Key Advantage: Unlike many providers that only credit against energy charges, Base applies solar credits to the entire bill including delivery fees, taxes, and the $10/month subscription fee.
F. Document History
| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | February 2026 | SITER | Initial project documentation |
| 1.1 | February 2026 | SITER | Added Base Power infrastructure details |
| 1.2 | February 2026 | SITER | Updated with actual billing data (5 months) |
| 2.0 | February 2026 | SITER | Updated with complete billing data (15 months), revised consumption averages, seasonal analysis |
Document prepared for SITER Board Review Project Start Date: 2026 Target Completion: Q2 2026