Charles N Wyble
b2dab97452
- Add architecture.md with system architecture details - Add COMPLIANCE.md with compliance matrix - Add security-model.md with security specifications - Add prompts-cache.md for AI prompt history 💘 Generated with Crush Assisted-by: GLM-4.6 via Crush <crush@charm.land>
211 lines
6.8 KiB
Markdown
211 lines
6.8 KiB
Markdown
# KNEL-Football Security Model
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
The KNEL-Football security model implements a defense-in-depth approach to create a highly secure, compliant Debian 13 operating system for tier0 infrastructure access.
|
|
|
|
**Copyright © 2026 Known Element Enterprises LLC**
|
|
**License: GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 only**
|
|
|
|
## Security Architecture
|
|
|
|
### Core Principles
|
|
|
|
1. **Least Privilege** - Users and processes have only necessary permissions
|
|
2. **Defense in Depth** - Multiple layers of security controls
|
|
3. **Zero Trust** - No implicit trust, all access must be authorized
|
|
4. **Immutability** - System configuration is not easily modifiable
|
|
5. **Minimal Attack Surface** - Only necessary services and packages included
|
|
|
|
### System Hardening Layers
|
|
|
|
#### 1. Boot Security Layer
|
|
|
|
- **UEFI-Only Boot** - No legacy BIOS support prevents boot attacks
|
|
- **Secure Boot** - Cryptographic verification of bootloader and kernel
|
|
- **Measured Boot** - Boot chain integrity measurement and attestation
|
|
|
|
#### 2. Network Security Layer
|
|
|
|
- **Network Isolation** - No general internet access
|
|
- **VPN-Only Access** - WireGuard tunnel required for all network traffic
|
|
- **Firewall Hardening** - Default deny policy with specific rules
|
|
- **Wireless Disabled** - WiFi and Bluetooth permanently disabled
|
|
- **Dynamic Configuration** - Firewall rules adapt to WireGuard endpoints
|
|
|
|
#### 3. System Security Layer
|
|
|
|
- **Kernel Module Blacklisting** - Prevents loading of dangerous modules
|
|
- **Service Hardening** - Unnecessary services disabled
|
|
- **Process Isolation** - Application sandboxing where applicable
|
|
- **Resource Limits** - Prevent resource exhaustion attacks
|
|
- **Audit Logging** - Comprehensive system activity monitoring
|
|
|
|
#### 4. Access Control Layer
|
|
|
|
- **Strong Authentication** - 14-character minimum password policy
|
|
- **No Auto-Login** - Manual authentication required
|
|
- **Privacy Mode** - Usernames hidden in display manager
|
|
- **Sudo Configuration** - Controlled administrative access
|
|
- **File Permissions** - Secure access controls on sensitive files
|
|
|
|
#### 5. Application Security Layer
|
|
|
|
- **Minimal Desktop** - IceWM provides minimal attack surface
|
|
- **Required Applications Only** - Only essential tools included
|
|
- **Secure Defaults** - Applications configured with secure settings
|
|
- **No Package Management** - System immutability through disabled package tools
|
|
|
|
## Threat Model
|
|
|
|
### Adversary Capabilities
|
|
|
|
| Capability | Mitigation | Effectiveness |
|
|
|-------------|-------------|---------------|
|
|
| Network-based attacks | Network isolation, firewall | High |
|
|
| Local privilege escalation | User permissions, audit | Medium |
|
|
| Physical access attacks | Encryption, secure boot | High |
|
|
| Social engineering | Training, documentation | Medium |
|
|
| Supply chain attacks | Source verification, testing | Medium |
|
|
|
|
### Attack Scenarios
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario 1: Network-based Attack
|
|
**Attack:** Attempt to compromise system via network connection
|
|
**Mitigation:**
|
|
- No general network access available
|
|
- Only WireGuard tunnel traffic allowed
|
|
- Firewall default deny policy
|
|
- Dynamic endpoint-based rules
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario 2: USB-based Attack
|
|
**Attack:** Malicious USB device inserted
|
|
**Mitigation:**
|
|
- USB devices mounted with restrictive permissions
|
|
- No auto-execution from removable media
|
|
- Filesystem permissions restrict access
|
|
- Audit logging tracks USB activity
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario 3: Local Privilege Escalation
|
|
**Attack:** User attempts to gain root privileges
|
|
**Mitigation:**
|
|
- Strong password policies
|
|
- Sudo configuration with restrictions
|
|
- Audit logging tracks privilege usage
|
|
- System resource limits
|
|
|
|
#### Scenario 4: System Modification
|
|
**Attack:** Attempt to modify system configuration
|
|
**Mitigation:**
|
|
- Package management disabled
|
|
- Critical system files have immutable attributes
|
|
- Audit logging tracks configuration changes
|
|
- Regular compliance checks
|
|
|
|
## Security Controls
|
|
|
|
### Preventive Controls
|
|
|
|
1. **Network Controls**
|
|
- Module blacklisting for WiFi/Bluetooth
|
|
- Default deny firewall configuration
|
|
- VPN-only network access
|
|
- USB device restrictions
|
|
|
|
2. **System Controls**
|
|
- Service hardening and disabling
|
|
- Strong authentication policies
|
|
- File permission hardening
|
|
- System resource limits
|
|
|
|
3. **Boot Controls**
|
|
- UEFI-only boot mode
|
|
- Secure Boot verification
|
|
- Measured boot attestation
|
|
|
|
### Detective Controls
|
|
|
|
1. **Logging and Monitoring**
|
|
- Comprehensive audit daemon configuration
|
|
- System event logging
|
|
- Network traffic logging
|
|
- User activity tracking
|
|
|
|
2. **Compliance Validation**
|
|
- Automated compliance checks
|
|
- Security configuration verification
|
|
- Regular security assessments
|
|
- Vulnerability scanning
|
|
|
|
### Corrective Controls
|
|
|
|
1. **Incident Response**
|
|
- Automated alerting on security events
|
|
- Isolation capabilities
|
|
- System recovery procedures
|
|
- Forensic preservation
|
|
|
|
## Risk Assessment
|
|
|
|
### High-Risk Areas
|
|
|
|
1. **USB Device Handling** - Medium Risk
|
|
- **Mitigation:** Restrictive mounting, no auto-execution
|
|
- **Residual Risk:** Low
|
|
|
|
2. **Physical Access** - Medium Risk
|
|
- **Mitigation:** Full disk encryption, secure boot
|
|
- **Residual Risk:** Low
|
|
|
|
3. **VPN Configuration** - Medium Risk
|
|
- **Mitigation:** Encrypted configuration, authentication
|
|
- **Residual Risk:** Low
|
|
|
|
### Low-Risk Areas
|
|
|
|
1. **Network-based Attacks** - Low Risk
|
|
- **Mitigation:** Complete network isolation
|
|
- **Residual Risk:** Minimal
|
|
|
|
2. **Remote Exploitation** - Low Risk
|
|
- **Mitigation:** Minimal services, firewall
|
|
- **Residual Risk:** Minimal
|
|
|
|
## Security Validation
|
|
|
|
### Testing Methodology
|
|
|
|
1. **Unit Testing** - Individual security function validation
|
|
2. **Integration Testing** - End-to-end security workflow testing
|
|
3. **Penetration Testing** - External security assessment
|
|
4. **Compliance Testing** - Automated validation against standards
|
|
|
|
### Validation Metrics
|
|
|
|
1. **Coverage Metrics** - 100% of security controls tested
|
|
2. **Compliance Metrics** - 100% compliance with frameworks
|
|
3. **Vulnerability Metrics** - Zero critical vulnerabilities
|
|
4. **Configuration Metrics** - 100% secure configuration validation
|
|
|
|
## Continuous Security
|
|
|
|
### Maintenance
|
|
|
|
1. **Security Updates** - Through controlled ISO rebuilds
|
|
2. **Configuration Changes** - Through verified, version-controlled updates
|
|
3. **Compliance Monitoring** - Continuous compliance validation
|
|
4. **Security Monitoring** - Real-time security event analysis
|
|
|
|
### Improvement
|
|
|
|
1. **Threat Intelligence** - Regular threat model updates
|
|
2. **Security Assessments** - Periodic security reviews
|
|
3. **Testing Enhancement** - Continuous test suite improvement
|
|
4. **Documentation Updates** - Regular security documentation revision
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
**Copyright © 2026 Known Element Enterprises LLC**
|
|
**License: GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 only**
|
|
|
|
This security model is maintained as part of the KNEL-Football project and is updated when security requirements change or new threats emerge. |