merging stuff from my joplin notes

ReleasedPrompts/LLM Scaffolding/COO Work/Doc prompt eng/Prompt Review Session Template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+# Prompt Review Session Template
+Version: 1.0 (2025-03-25)
+
+## PURPOSE
+This template facilitates a structured review of prompts developed during the initial engineering session to refine and optimize their effectiveness.
+
+## PREPARATION CHECKLIST
+- [ ] Initial prompt draft ready for review
+- [ ] Test results from initial implementation documented
+- [ ] Review team assembled with appropriate expertise
+- [ ] Success criteria clearly defined
+- [ ] Previous session notes accessible
+
+## SESSION STRUCTURE
+
+### 1. PROMPT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
+```
+[PROMPT UNDER REVIEW]:
+[INITIAL SUCCESS CRITERIA]:
+[PERFORMANCE METRICS]:
+[AREAS MEETING EXPECTATIONS]:
+[AREAS REQUIRING IMPROVEMENT]:
+```
+
+### 2. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
+
+#### 2.1 Context Effectiveness
+```
+[SUFFICIENT BACKGROUND PROVIDED?]: Yes/No
+[MISSING CONTEXT ELEMENTS]:
+[SUPERFLUOUS CONTEXT ELEMENTS]:
+[CLARITY OF DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE]:
+```
+
+#### 2.2 Instruction Clarity
+```
+[AMBIGUOUS INSTRUCTIONS IDENTIFIED]:
+[CONFLICTING GUIDELINES IDENTIFIED]:
+[INSTRUCTION HIERARCHY CLEAR?]: Yes/No
+[GUARDRAIL EFFECTIVENESS]:
+```
+
+#### 2.3 Format Adherence
+```
+[FORMAT REQUIREMENTS MET?]: Yes/No
+[STRUCTURAL INCONSISTENCIES]:
+[STYLISTIC DEVIATIONS]:
+[QUALITY OF OUTPUT STRUCTURE]:
+```
+
+#### 2.4 Example Utility
+```
+[EXAMPLES PROPERLY REFERENCED?]: Yes/No
+[EXAMPLE DIVERSITY SUFFICIENT?]: Yes/No
+[MISSING EXAMPLE SCENARIOS]:
+```
+
+### 3. CONTENT QUALITY EVALUATION
+```
+[FACTUAL ACCURACY]:
+[COMPLETENESS OF CONTENT]:
+[LOGICAL FLOW]:
+[APPROPRIATE TONE]:
+[TERMINOLOGY CONSISTENCY]:
+```
+
+### 4. OPTIMIZATION STRATEGIES
+
+#### 4.1 Targeted Improvements
+```
+[SPECIFIC ELEMENT]:
+[CURRENT STATE]:
+[PROPOSED REVISION]:
+[RATIONALE]:
+```
+
+#### 4.2 Experimental Variations
+```
+[VARIATION A]:
+[VARIATION B]:
+[COMPARISON METHODOLOGY]:
+[SUCCESS INDICATORS]:
+```
+
+### 5. REVISED PROMPT
+```
+[UPDATED FULL PROMPT TEXT]:
+```
+
+### 6. VALIDATION TESTING
+```
+[TEST SCENARIO 1]:
+[OUTCOME]:
+[IMPROVEMENT FROM ORIGINAL?]: Yes/No/Partial
+
+[TEST SCENARIO 2]:
+[OUTCOME]:
+[IMPROVEMENT FROM ORIGINAL?]: Yes/No/Partial
+```
+
+### 7. IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS
+```
+[GO/NO-GO DECISION]:
+[RECOMMENDED DEPLOYMENT CONTEXT]:
+[MONITORING REQUIREMENTS]:
+[EXPECTED MAINTENANCE FREQUENCY]:
+```
+
+### 8. NEXT STEPS
+- [ ] Finalize prompt documentation
+- [ ] Schedule follow-up review if needed
+- [ ] Plan implementation strategy
+- [ ] Update continuity document with review outcomes
+
+## NOTES
+- Use validation checklist to prevent redundant testing
+- Document all stakeholder feedback received
+- Consider A/B testing for significant changes
+- Flag edge cases for special handling
+
+---
+*Cross-reference with: Validation Checklist, Initial Prompt Engineering Session, Continuity Document*