- Document all questions, comments, and concerns before implementation - Categorize by priority: High (blockers), Medium (challenges), Low (nice to have) - Mark resolved items: Debian 13.3.0 availability and USB package inclusion - Ready for stakeholder review and inline feedback
4.8 KiB
4.8 KiB
Pre-Flight Discussion - Questions, Comments, and Concerns
Questions:
1. Debian 13 Availability ✅ RESOLVED
- Original: Debian 13 (Trixie) is currently in testing
- Status: RESOLVED - Debian 13.3.0 is released and stable
- Action: Updated spec to use debian-13.3.0-amd64-netinst.iso
2. USB Automounting and Package Inclusion ✅ RESOLVED
- Original: How will the system access USB mounting utilities without network access?
- Status: RESOLVED - All packages must be pre-included in ISO
- Action: Updated spec to clarify all utilities pre-installed
3. Compliance Specificity
- Question: Which specific CMMC levels, FedRAMP authorization levels, or STIG IDs should we target?
- Concern: Without specific controls, we may implement security measures that don't meet actual requirements
- Options:
- CMMC Level 3, 4, or 5?
- FedRAMP Moderate or High?
- Specific DISA STIG for Debian 13?
4. WireGuard Configuration Management
- Question: Should we assume WireGuard config will be provided via USB, or include a default template?
- Concern: Without a config, the system will have no network connectivity at all
- Options:
- Include sample/template configuration
- Include QR code import capability
- Assume user provides complete config via USB
Technical Concerns:
5. Docker Build Context and Package Availability
- Concern: The current Dockerfile may not have all required packages for Debian 13.3.0
- Issue: Package names or availability may differ between Debian versions
- Need: Verify all packages in Dockerfile exist in Debian 13.3.0
6. Test Environment Privileges
- Concern: Some tests (firewall, system services) require elevated privileges
- Issue: Container environment may not support all required test scenarios
- Need: Determine how to test privileged operations in containers
7. ISO Size Management
- Concern: Including all security tools, applications, and utilities may create a large ISO
- Issue: Large ISO may be impractical for distribution or booting on older hardware
- Need: Define acceptable ISO size limits and optimization strategies
Missing Details:
8. Complete Package List
- Missing: Exact package list for base system and applications
- Need: Define all packages to include in the ISO (not just applications like Remmina, etc.)
- Examples: Which kernel packages? Which security tools? Which system utilities?
9. Live-build Configuration Details
- Missing: Specific live-build configuration parameters
- Need: Kernel parameters, boot options, system settings
- Examples: Security kernel parameters, initrd options, bootloader security
10. Error Handling and Recovery
- Missing: Comprehensive error handling strategy
- Need: How to handle build failures, configuration errors, system boot issues
- Examples: Build failures, corrupted configs, boot problems
11. Boot Security
- Missing: Boot loader security requirements
- Need: Secure boot configuration, bootloader password, boot parameters
- Examples: GRUB security, kernel lockdown, initramfs security
Additional Considerations:
12. User Experience and Documentation
- Concern: Security-focused system may be difficult for users
- Need: Clear documentation for secure workflows
- Question: Should we include user guides in the ISO?
13. System Updates and Maintenance
- Question: How will the system receive security updates without general internet access?
- Options:
- Air-gapped update process
- USB-based update distribution
- No updates after initial deployment
14. Hardware Compatibility
- Concern: Minimal desktop may have hardware compatibility issues
- Need: Define supported hardware scope
- Question: Should we include additional drivers or keep it minimal?
15. Testing Strategy for Air-Gapped Environment
- Challenge: How to test an ISO designed for air-gapped use
- Need: Testing methodology that doesn't require internet
- Question: Should we simulate air-gapped environment during testing?
Priority Assessment:
High Priority (Blockers):
- Q3: Compliance specificity
- Q4: WireGuard configuration approach
- M8: Complete package list
- M9: Live-build configuration details
Medium Priority (Implementation Challenges):
- TC5: Docker package availability
- TC6: Test environment privileges
- TC7: ISO size management
Low Priority (Nice to Have):
- M10: Error handling strategy
- M11: Boot security details
- A12-A15: Additional considerations
Status: Awaiting your feedback on the above questions and concerns Next Action: Review your inline edits and address any additional points Ready for Implementation: NO - Need to resolve high priority items first