Files
PFVCluster/docs/k8s/README.md
T
mrcharles 8f1642bf96 feat(k8s): deploy 3-node k3s HA control plane over Tailscale
Bootstrap a regular (non-ITAR) k3s cluster on cnode1/2/3 with embedded
etcd. All cluster communication — node registration, API server, etcd
peering, flannel VXLAN — runs exclusively over Tailscale IPs. Zero LAN
addresses appear in node status or TLS certificates.

Scripts (k8s/):
- env.sh: shared config (Tailscale IPs, SSH opts, k3s version)
- wipe.sh: remove existing k3s from all cnodes
- install-cp.sh: full bootstrap (cnode1 --cluster-init, then cnode2/3 join)
- join-servers.sh: re-join cnode2/3 only (fixes broken join state)
- post-setup.sh: apply NoSchedule taints, fetch kubeconfig, verify
- verify.sh: 13-point health check (nodes, Tailscale IPs, taints, etcd,
  CoreDNS, API server, workload isolation)
- probe-nodes.sh: SSH + Tailscale reachability check

All 3 cnodes are tainted control-plane:NoSchedule so no user workloads
can schedule on the control plane. 13/13 health checks pass.

Docs updated: k8s README TL;DR reflects k3s (not Talos) as the deployed
choice, with Talos preserved for the future ITAR cluster.

💘 Generated with Crush

Assisted-by: Crush:glm-5.2
2026-07-28 12:21:33 -05:00

45 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown

# Kubernetes Architecture & Build Plan
> **Status:** Draft for review. Companion to [`../proxmox/K8S.md`](../proxmox/K8S.md)
> (which captured the storage/host analysis from the Proxmox audit).
> This directory takes the next step: **which distro, how to build it,
> how to operate it.**
**Last updated:** 2026-07-28
## Documents in this directory
| Document | Purpose |
|----------|---------|
| [`DISTRO-DECISION.md`](DISTRO-DECISION.md) | Talos vs k3s analysis. Recommendation: **Talos**, with rationale grounded in the ITAR/classified requirement. |
| [`ARCHITECTURE.md`](ARCHITECTURE.md) | Target architecture: control plane, network, identity, storage, tenant isolation. Mermaid diagrams included. |
## TL;DR
| Decision | Recommendation | Why |
|----------|----------------|-----|
| **Distro** | **k3s** (deployed) / **Talos** (for future ITAR) | k3s chosen for the regular R&D cluster now live on cnode1/2/3. Talos is the recommendation for when the ITAR/classified cluster comes online. |
| **Runtime** | **containerd** | Talos/k3s default. |
| **Cnode count** | **3** (deployed) | Standard HA. Tolerates 1 failure. |
| **Admin access** | **Tailscale (all nodes joined)** | Currently all cnodes are on Tailscale directly. For ITAR cluster, move to subnet-router pattern. |
| **Cluster network** | **Tailscale-only IPs** | All node-ip, advertise-address, TLS-SANs are 100.x Tailscale IPs. Zero LAN IPs in cluster state. |
| **Identity** | **OIDC to Keycloak** on Cloudron (production) | Future work. |
| **Multi-tenancy** | **vcluster** (per tenant) | Future work. |
| **Local registry** | **Harbor on D3 SSD** (tsys5, 445 GB free) | Future work. |
| **Storage classes** | `local-fast`, `nfs-hdd`, `nfs-ssd` | Per [`../proxmox/K8S.md`](../proxmox/K8S.md) §6. Future work. |
## What this directory does NOT cover (deferred)
- ETL tooling choice (GDAL/PostGIS/xarray/Dask) — affects RWX vs RWO design.
- HPC job scheduler (Jobs / Argo Workflows / Volcano) — affects taint/label strategy.
- vcluster per-tenant policy templates.
- Solar-aware scale-out (PowerEdge 19xx/2950 hosts) — capacity planning only.
These are tracked as future session work in [`../../STATUS.md`](../../STATUS.md).
## Open question for the user
1. **Cnode count: confirm 3 vs 5.** Recommendation is 3 (rationale in
[`ARCHITECTURE.md`](ARCHITECTURE.md) §2). If your ITAR counsel requires
2-failure tolerance on the control plane, keep 5.