docs(audit): RAM/CPU placement audit + codify capacity goals

Add CAPACITY-GOALS.md (80% RAM / ~50% idle CPU targets + workload placement
model) and AUDIT-2026-07-29.md (live end-to-end analysis of all 7 hosts). Key
findings: memory goal met fleet-wide (highest 72%); CPU idles 0-6% (chase via
workloads, not hardware); tsys5 is single-CPU not dual; cnode4/5 are stale
running VMs. Answers the wnode-sizing question (grow tsys9, not tsys1), confirms
tsys6/7 for RackRental, and gives a DDR3 compatibility decision tree (RDIMM-only
servers reject consumer UDIMM). Refreshed STATUS/docmap and the returned audit
logs, and fixed an empty-array abort in deploy-check.sh.

💘 Generated with Crush

Assisted-by: Crush:glm-5.2
This commit is contained in:
2026-07-29 05:32:12 -05:00
parent 428e9ecb1d
commit 575d79f611
20 changed files with 17317 additions and 19981 deletions
+5
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,10 @@
# Fresh Fleet Audit — 2026-07-28 (revised)
> **A newer audit exists:** [`AUDIT-2026-07-29.md`](AUDIT-2026-07-29.md) (RAM/CPU
> placement focus, with codified capacity goals). Placement numbers below are
> superseded where the two conflict; this doc remains authoritative for the
> **Friday storage/hardware plan (§5)** and storage-redundancy analysis.
> **Supersedes placement data in [`PROJECT.md`](PROJECT.md) §4-§8.**
**Audit time:** 2026-07-28 20:30 CDT