docs(questions): C4 credentials + C5 scope + C6 docker rulings recorded [#767]
Answers landed 2026-09-03: Bitwarden/Vault = cred SoR (.creds bootstrap-only); this chat = COO/C2-only (PM/policy/enablement), agent stack lives here; docker(988) verified on all 7 TSG*/COS* officer accounts.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -101,15 +101,32 @@ agent/system creds), ~/.creds 0600 (current house rules), Vaultwarden (your app-
|
|||||||
ruling). Proposed: Bitwarden = agent + system API credentials going forward (~/.creds
|
ruling). Proposed: Bitwarden = agent + system API credentials going forward (~/.creds
|
||||||
deprecated as #478 ingests them), Vaultwarden stays for app-internal secrets. Confirm?
|
deprecated as #478 ingests them), Vaultwarden stays for app-internal secrets. Confirm?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> **ANSWERED 2026-09-03 (Charles):** Bitwarden/Vault is the SoR — "its the latter."
|
||||||
|
> ~/.creds is a bootstrap mechanism for convenience only (same as using the
|
||||||
|
> reachableceo linux/cloudron account as a bootstrap identity). Going forward: new
|
||||||
|
> agent/system credentials land in Bitwarden; ~/.creds materializes bootstrap copies.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### C5. #767 scope split
|
### C5. #767 scope split
|
||||||
This chat owns the CR escalation ladder + GLPI Changes wiring + mechanical gates
|
This chat owns the CR escalation ladder + GLPI Changes wiring + mechanical gates
|
||||||
(ticket-gate CR check, X-Consumer attribution); TSGCOO's lane owns identity provisioning
|
(ticket-gate CR check, X-Consumer attribution); TSGCOO's lane owns identity provisioning
|
||||||
execution (#442/#478). Confirm the seam?
|
execution (#442/#478). Confirm the seam?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> **ANSWERED 2026-09-03 (Charles):** No split — **this chat is COO/C2 only going
|
||||||
|
> forward** (project management, policy making, enablement). The agent stack IS
|
||||||
|
> enablement → it lives HERE, end-to-end (design + provisioning execution). Dedicated
|
||||||
|
> chats get spun up for any work that isn't PM/policy/enablement. TSGCOO's existing
|
||||||
|
> tree is prior art feeding this chat, not a separate lane.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### C6. Resume TSGCOO's blockers?
|
### C6. Resume TSGCOO's blockers?
|
||||||
Q1-Q6 in org-buildout/questions-v1.md + #478 stage-2 re-gate. I can clear Q1 (docker
|
Q1-Q6 in org-buildout/questions-v1.md + #478 stage-2 re-gate. I can clear Q1 (docker
|
||||||
group for TSGCOO) now — say the word. Invite links (Q3) + Gitea token (Q4) are yours.
|
group for TSGCOO) now — say the word. Invite links (Q3) + Gitea token (Q4) are yours.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> **ANSWERED 2026-09-03 (Charles):** "yes give all of the TSG* and COS* accounts docker
|
||||||
|
> group access. that is super critical for all them to work." → VERIFIED ALREADY IN
|
||||||
|
> PLACE: docker(988) confirmed on all 7 officer accounts (TSGCOO, TSGCCO, TSGCTO,
|
||||||
|
> TSGBOD, COS-RCEO, COS-WFO, COS-TSG). Org-buildout Q1 closed. Q3 (Cloudron invite
|
||||||
|
> links ×9) + Q4 (Gitea push token) remain Charles's.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### C7. Leaked vptechops Gitea token
|
### C7. Leaked vptechops Gitea token
|
||||||
Listed in a KNELSecretsManager remote URL — rotate at your convenience (your console,
|
Listed in a KNELSecretsManager remote URL — rotate at your convenience (your console,
|
||||||
not my lane).
|
not my lane).
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user