big consolidation
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,57 +1,57 @@
|
||||
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
|
||||
\usepackage{graphicx}
|
||||
\usepackage{geometry}
|
||||
|
||||
\title{}
|
||||
\date{}
|
||||
|
||||
\newcommand{\statement}[1]{\textbf{#1} \medskip}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{document}
|
||||
|
||||
\thispagestyle{empty}
|
||||
\pagestyle{empty}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[t]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[scale=0.4]{thefnf-logo.png}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
% Make commands for the quotes
|
||||
\newcommand*{\openquote}
|
||||
{\fontfamily{\familydefault}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{it}\fontsize{12}{14}\selectfont``}
|
||||
\newcommand*{\closequote}
|
||||
{\fontfamily{\familydefault}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{it}\fontsize{12}{14}\selectfont''}
|
||||
% wrap everything in its own environment
|
||||
\newenvironment{shadequote}%
|
||||
{\begin{quote}\openquote}
|
||||
{\hfill\closequote\end{quote}}
|
||||
|
||||
\noindent
|
||||
\textbf{Our Vision}
|
||||
\begin{shadequote}
|
||||
We envision a world where communities build, maintain, and own their own share
|
||||
of the global computer network.
|
||||
\end{shadequote}
|
||||
\textbf{\\ Our Mission}
|
||||
\begin{shadequote}
|
||||
Americns For A Better Network is a nonprofit organization that provides operators
|
||||
around the world with essential infrastructure for the realization and support
|
||||
of free networks. We engineer tools and develop educational resources to
|
||||
facilitate the deployment of resilient, responsive, and accessible networks.
|
||||
\end{shadequote}
|
||||
\textbf{\\ Our Values}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item We are an organization committed to the tenets of free information, free culture, and free society.
|
||||
\item We hold that advances in information technology provide humanity with
|
||||
the ability to effectively face global challenges.
|
||||
\item We contend that our very ability to mobilize, organize, and bring
|
||||
about change depends on our ability to communicate.
|
||||
\item We see that our ability to communicate is purchased from a handful of
|
||||
powerful entities.
|
||||
\item We know that we cannot depend on these entities to support movement
|
||||
away from a status quo from which they are the beneficiaries.
|
||||
\item We believe that access to a free network is a human right, and a
|
||||
necessary tool for environmental and social justice.
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{document}
|
||||
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
|
||||
\usepackage{graphicx}
|
||||
\usepackage{geometry}
|
||||
|
||||
\title{}
|
||||
\date{}
|
||||
|
||||
\newcommand{\statement}[1]{\textbf{#1} \medskip}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{document}
|
||||
|
||||
\thispagestyle{empty}
|
||||
\pagestyle{empty}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[t]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[scale=0.4]{thefnf-logo.png}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
% Make commands for the quotes
|
||||
\newcommand*{\openquote}
|
||||
{\fontfamily{\familydefault}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{it}\fontsize{12}{14}\selectfont``}
|
||||
\newcommand*{\closequote}
|
||||
{\fontfamily{\familydefault}\fontseries{m}\fontshape{it}\fontsize{12}{14}\selectfont''}
|
||||
% wrap everything in its own environment
|
||||
\newenvironment{shadequote}%
|
||||
{\begin{quote}\openquote}
|
||||
{\hfill\closequote\end{quote}}
|
||||
|
||||
\noindent
|
||||
\textbf{Our Vision}
|
||||
\begin{shadequote}
|
||||
We envision a world where communities build, maintain, and own their own share
|
||||
of the global computer network.
|
||||
\end{shadequote}
|
||||
\textbf{\\ Our Mission}
|
||||
\begin{shadequote}
|
||||
Americns For A Better Network is a nonprofit organization that provides operators
|
||||
around the world with essential infrastructure for the realization and support
|
||||
of free networks. We engineer tools and develop educational resources to
|
||||
facilitate the deployment of resilient, responsive, and accessible networks.
|
||||
\end{shadequote}
|
||||
\textbf{\\ Our Values}
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item We are an organization committed to the tenets of free information, free culture, and free society.
|
||||
\item We hold that advances in information technology provide humanity with
|
||||
the ability to effectively face global challenges.
|
||||
\item We contend that our very ability to mobilize, organize, and bring
|
||||
about change depends on our ability to communicate.
|
||||
\item We see that our ability to communicate is purchased from a handful of
|
||||
powerful entities.
|
||||
\item We know that we cannot depend on these entities to support movement
|
||||
away from a status quo from which they are the beneficiaries.
|
||||
\item We believe that access to a free network is a human right, and a
|
||||
necessary tool for environmental and social justice.
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{document}
|
||||
|
@@ -1,39 +1,39 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
**Our Vision**
|
||||
|
||||
> " We envision a world where communities build, maintain, and own their
|
||||
> own share of the global computer network. "
|
||||
|
||||
**\
|
||||
Our Mission**
|
||||
|
||||
> " Americns For A Better Network is a nonprofit organization that
|
||||
> provides operators around the world with essential infrastructure for
|
||||
> the realization and support of free networks. We engineer tools and
|
||||
> develop educational resources to facilitate the deployment of
|
||||
> resilient, responsive, and accessible networks. "
|
||||
|
||||
**\
|
||||
Our Values**
|
||||
|
||||
- We are an organization committed to the tenets of free information,
|
||||
free culture, and free society.
|
||||
|
||||
- We hold that advances in information technology provide humanity
|
||||
with the ability to effectively face global challenges.
|
||||
|
||||
- We contend that our very ability to mobilize, organize, and bring
|
||||
about change depends on our ability to communicate.
|
||||
|
||||
- We see that our ability to communicate is purchased from a handful
|
||||
of powerful entities.
|
||||
|
||||
- We know that we cannot depend on these entities to support movement
|
||||
away from a status quo from which they are the beneficiaries.
|
||||
|
||||
- We believe that access to a free network is a human right, and a
|
||||
necessary tool for environmental and social justice.
|
||||
---
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
**Our Vision**
|
||||
|
||||
> " We envision a world where communities build, maintain, and own their
|
||||
> own share of the global computer network. "
|
||||
|
||||
**\
|
||||
Our Mission**
|
||||
|
||||
> " Americns For A Better Network is a nonprofit organization that
|
||||
> provides operators around the world with essential infrastructure for
|
||||
> the realization and support of free networks. We engineer tools and
|
||||
> develop educational resources to facilitate the deployment of
|
||||
> resilient, responsive, and accessible networks. "
|
||||
|
||||
**\
|
||||
Our Values**
|
||||
|
||||
- We are an organization committed to the tenets of free information,
|
||||
free culture, and free society.
|
||||
|
||||
- We hold that advances in information technology provide humanity
|
||||
with the ability to effectively face global challenges.
|
||||
|
||||
- We contend that our very ability to mobilize, organize, and bring
|
||||
about change depends on our ability to communicate.
|
||||
|
||||
- We see that our ability to communicate is purchased from a handful
|
||||
of powerful entities.
|
||||
|
||||
- We know that we cannot depend on these entities to support movement
|
||||
away from a status quo from which they are the beneficiaries.
|
||||
|
||||
- We believe that access to a free network is a human right, and a
|
||||
necessary tool for environmental and social justice.
|
||||
|
@@ -1,60 +1,60 @@
|
||||
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
|
||||
\usepackage{graphicx}
|
||||
\usepackage{geometry}
|
||||
|
||||
\title{\huge \bf Grow Your Own Network}
|
||||
\date{}
|
||||
|
||||
\newcommand{\statement}[1]{\textbf{#1} \medskip}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{document}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[t]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[scale=0.4]{thefnf-logo.png}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\maketitle
|
||||
\thispagestyle{empty}
|
||||
\pagestyle{empty}
|
||||
|
||||
\statement{We envision a world where communities build, maintain, and own their
|
||||
own share of the global computer network. Free networks, when properly
|
||||
engineered, offer their users both a greater say in the governance of their
|
||||
network, and more privacy in their communications. Being your own service
|
||||
provider is the only way to make sure that your service provider treats you
|
||||
right. We call this the principle of digital self-determination, and have
|
||||
designed, prototyped and test deployed a suite of network appliances that
|
||||
will facilitate the realization of this principle.}
|
||||
\\
|
||||
\\
|
||||
The free software community has developed a wide variety of software components
|
||||
to address various network related challenges. Americans For A Better Network,
|
||||
working with members of the community, is looking to take those components and
|
||||
deliver a turnkey, self-administered networking solution that will allow for
|
||||
cascading self-governance on local, regional and global scales.
|
||||
\\
|
||||
\\
|
||||
Paired with a cooperative network management suite and integrated cryptosystem,
|
||||
our tools will allow for the rapid, simple construction of cooperative
|
||||
autonomous systems, with end-to-end encryption enabled by default.
|
||||
\\
|
||||
\\
|
||||
The entire suite is designed to be deployed using the principle of emergence —
|
||||
meaning that it can be organized in a way that is bottom-up, top-down or
|
||||
middle-out. We call the network appliances FreedomNode, FreedomTower, and
|
||||
FreedomLink. The management suite is called AutoNOC, and the transparent
|
||||
cryptosystem is AutoTunnel.
|
||||
\\
|
||||
\\
|
||||
In addition to radically increasing network resilience, reducing the price of
|
||||
connectivity, and making networks more responsive to the needs of their
|
||||
participants, free network architectures will allow for groundbreaking
|
||||
localized applications of network technology. The uses of this technology are
|
||||
myriad, and the need is ubiquitous – anywhere in the world, the capacity for
|
||||
self-reliance and self-determination would be enhanced by the emergence of a
|
||||
free network. Inverting the power structure of our networks is bound to take a
|
||||
while, and we are still in the very beginning, but no idea holds greater
|
||||
liberating potential than this: computer networks should be funded, built, and
|
||||
maintained by those that use them.
|
||||
\end{document}
|
||||
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
|
||||
\usepackage{graphicx}
|
||||
\usepackage{geometry}
|
||||
|
||||
\title{\huge \bf Grow Your Own Network}
|
||||
\date{}
|
||||
|
||||
\newcommand{\statement}[1]{\textbf{#1} \medskip}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{document}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[t]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[scale=0.4]{thefnf-logo.png}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\maketitle
|
||||
\thispagestyle{empty}
|
||||
\pagestyle{empty}
|
||||
|
||||
\statement{We envision a world where communities build, maintain, and own their
|
||||
own share of the global computer network. Free networks, when properly
|
||||
engineered, offer their users both a greater say in the governance of their
|
||||
network, and more privacy in their communications. Being your own service
|
||||
provider is the only way to make sure that your service provider treats you
|
||||
right. We call this the principle of digital self-determination, and have
|
||||
designed, prototyped and test deployed a suite of network appliances that
|
||||
will facilitate the realization of this principle.}
|
||||
\\
|
||||
\\
|
||||
The free software community has developed a wide variety of software components
|
||||
to address various network related challenges. Americans For A Better Network,
|
||||
working with members of the community, is looking to take those components and
|
||||
deliver a turnkey, self-administered networking solution that will allow for
|
||||
cascading self-governance on local, regional and global scales.
|
||||
\\
|
||||
\\
|
||||
Paired with a cooperative network management suite and integrated cryptosystem,
|
||||
our tools will allow for the rapid, simple construction of cooperative
|
||||
autonomous systems, with end-to-end encryption enabled by default.
|
||||
\\
|
||||
\\
|
||||
The entire suite is designed to be deployed using the principle of emergence —
|
||||
meaning that it can be organized in a way that is bottom-up, top-down or
|
||||
middle-out. We call the network appliances FreedomNode, FreedomTower, and
|
||||
FreedomLink. The management suite is called AutoNOC, and the transparent
|
||||
cryptosystem is AutoTunnel.
|
||||
\\
|
||||
\\
|
||||
In addition to radically increasing network resilience, reducing the price of
|
||||
connectivity, and making networks more responsive to the needs of their
|
||||
participants, free network architectures will allow for groundbreaking
|
||||
localized applications of network technology. The uses of this technology are
|
||||
myriad, and the need is ubiquitous – anywhere in the world, the capacity for
|
||||
self-reliance and self-determination would be enhanced by the emergence of a
|
||||
free network. Inverting the power structure of our networks is bound to take a
|
||||
while, and we are still in the very beginning, but no idea holds greater
|
||||
liberating potential than this: computer networks should be funded, built, and
|
||||
maintained by those that use them.
|
||||
\end{document}
|
||||
|
@@ -1,45 +1,45 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: '**Grow Your Own Network**'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
**We envision a world where communities build, maintain, and own their
|
||||
own share of the global computer network. Free networks, when properly
|
||||
engineered, offer their users both a greater say in the governance of
|
||||
their network, and more privacy in their communications. Being your own
|
||||
service provider is the only way to make sure that your service provider
|
||||
treats you right. We call this the principle of digital
|
||||
self-determination, and have designed, prototyped and test deployed a
|
||||
suite of network appliances that will facilitate the realization of this
|
||||
principle.**\
|
||||
\
|
||||
The free software community has developed a wide variety of software
|
||||
components to address various network related challenges. Americans For
|
||||
A Better Network, working with members of the community, is looking to
|
||||
take those components and deliver a turnkey, self-administered
|
||||
networking solution that will allow for cascading self-governance on
|
||||
local, regional and global scales.\
|
||||
\
|
||||
Paired with a cooperative network management suite and integrated
|
||||
cryptosystem, our tools will allow for the rapid, simple construction of
|
||||
cooperative autonomous systems, with end-to-end encryption enabled by
|
||||
default.\
|
||||
\
|
||||
The entire suite is designed to be deployed using the principle of
|
||||
emergence --- meaning that it can be organized in a way that is
|
||||
bottom-up, top-down or middle-out. We call the network appliances
|
||||
FreedomNode, FreedomTower, and FreedomLink. The management suite is
|
||||
called AutoNOC, and the transparent cryptosystem is AutoTunnel.\
|
||||
\
|
||||
In addition to radically increasing network resilience, reducing the
|
||||
price of connectivity, and making networks more responsive to the needs
|
||||
of their participants, free network architectures will allow for
|
||||
groundbreaking localized applications of network technology. The uses of
|
||||
this technology are myriad, and the need is ubiquitous -- anywhere in
|
||||
the world, the capacity for self-reliance and self-determination would
|
||||
be enhanced by the emergence of a free network. Inverting the power
|
||||
structure of our networks is bound to take a while, and we are still in
|
||||
the very beginning, but no idea holds greater liberating potential than
|
||||
this: computer networks should be funded, built, and maintained by those
|
||||
that use them.
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: '**Grow Your Own Network**'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
**We envision a world where communities build, maintain, and own their
|
||||
own share of the global computer network. Free networks, when properly
|
||||
engineered, offer their users both a greater say in the governance of
|
||||
their network, and more privacy in their communications. Being your own
|
||||
service provider is the only way to make sure that your service provider
|
||||
treats you right. We call this the principle of digital
|
||||
self-determination, and have designed, prototyped and test deployed a
|
||||
suite of network appliances that will facilitate the realization of this
|
||||
principle.**\
|
||||
\
|
||||
The free software community has developed a wide variety of software
|
||||
components to address various network related challenges. Americans For
|
||||
A Better Network, working with members of the community, is looking to
|
||||
take those components and deliver a turnkey, self-administered
|
||||
networking solution that will allow for cascading self-governance on
|
||||
local, regional and global scales.\
|
||||
\
|
||||
Paired with a cooperative network management suite and integrated
|
||||
cryptosystem, our tools will allow for the rapid, simple construction of
|
||||
cooperative autonomous systems, with end-to-end encryption enabled by
|
||||
default.\
|
||||
\
|
||||
The entire suite is designed to be deployed using the principle of
|
||||
emergence --- meaning that it can be organized in a way that is
|
||||
bottom-up, top-down or middle-out. We call the network appliances
|
||||
FreedomNode, FreedomTower, and FreedomLink. The management suite is
|
||||
called AutoNOC, and the transparent cryptosystem is AutoTunnel.\
|
||||
\
|
||||
In addition to radically increasing network resilience, reducing the
|
||||
price of connectivity, and making networks more responsive to the needs
|
||||
of their participants, free network architectures will allow for
|
||||
groundbreaking localized applications of network technology. The uses of
|
||||
this technology are myriad, and the need is ubiquitous -- anywhere in
|
||||
the world, the capacity for self-reliance and self-determination would
|
||||
be enhanced by the emergence of a free network. Inverting the power
|
||||
structure of our networks is bound to take a while, and we are still in
|
||||
the very beginning, but no idea holds greater liberating potential than
|
||||
this: computer networks should be funded, built, and maintained by those
|
||||
that use them.
|
||||
|
@@ -1,99 +1,99 @@
|
||||
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
|
||||
\usepackage{graphicx}
|
||||
\usepackage{geometry}
|
||||
|
||||
\title{\huge \bf Free Network Definition}
|
||||
\date{}
|
||||
|
||||
\newcommand{\statement}[1]{\textbf{#1} \medskip}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{document}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[t]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[scale=0.4]{thefnf-logo.png}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\maketitle
|
||||
\thispagestyle{empty}
|
||||
\pagestyle{empty}
|
||||
|
||||
\statement{The fundamental dialectic of our struggle is this: will we be
|
||||
enslaved by our technology, or liberated by it? It was in cognizance of this
|
||||
notion, and in service to our collective freedom that the Free Software
|
||||
Movement was born. It is in this spirit that we aim here to define exactly
|
||||
what it means to say that a network is free. We hope that the existence of
|
||||
this definition will help illuminate the path to a more just world.}
|
||||
\\
|
||||
\\
|
||||
Our intention is to build communications systems that are owned by the people
|
||||
that use them, that allow participants to own their own data, and that use
|
||||
end-to-end encryption and cryptographic trust mechanisms to assure privacy. We
|
||||
call such systems `free networks' and they are characterized by the following
|
||||
five freedoms:
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item \textbf{Freedom 0) \\
|
||||
The freedom to participate in the network.}
|
||||
|
||||
Freedom 0 regards your right to organize cooperative networks. Conventional
|
||||
networks are characterized by a distinction between provider and user. This
|
||||
mode of organization encourages network operation in the service of
|
||||
self-interest. The provider builds and owns the infrastructure, and the user
|
||||
pays for access. In a free network, however, nodes connect to one another,
|
||||
rather than to a single, monolithic provider. By nature of its design, a free
|
||||
network is owned by those that make use of it. Participants act as providers
|
||||
and users as the same time, and growth is auto-distributed by treating any
|
||||
profits as investment. In this way, those that join the network are able to
|
||||
become owners. This mode of organization encourages network operation in the
|
||||
service of the common good.
|
||||
|
||||
\newpage
|
||||
\item \textbf{Freedom 1) \\
|
||||
The freedom to determine where one's bits are stored.}
|
||||
|
||||
Freedom 1 regards your right to own the material stores of your data.
|
||||
Conventional networks encourage (if not force) their participants to store
|
||||
their data in machines which are under the administrative auspices of an
|
||||
external service provider or host. Most folks are not able to serve data from
|
||||
their homes. Participants ought to be free to store their own data (so that
|
||||
it is under their care) without sacrificing their ability to publish it.
|
||||
|
||||
\item \textbf{Freedom 2) \\
|
||||
The freedom to determine the parties with whom one's bits are shared.}
|
||||
|
||||
Freedom 2 regards your right to control access to your data. Data mining and
|
||||
the monetization of sharing has become common practice. Participants should
|
||||
be free to choose those with whom they would like to share a given piece of
|
||||
information. Only someone who owns their own data can fully exercise this
|
||||
freedom, but it is an issue regardless of where the relevant bits are stored.
|
||||
|
||||
\item \textbf{Freedom 3) \\
|
||||
The freedom to transmit bits to one's peers without the prospect of
|
||||
interference, interception or censorship.}
|
||||
|
||||
Freedom 3 regards the right to speak freely with your peers. Information
|
||||
flows in conventional networks are routinely and intentionally intercepted,
|
||||
obstructed, and censored. This is done at the behest of corporate and state
|
||||
actors around the world. In a free network, private communications should
|
||||
remain unexamined from the time they enter the network until the time they
|
||||
reach their destination.
|
||||
|
||||
\item \textbf{Freedom 4) \\
|
||||
The freedom to maintain anonymity, or to present a unique, trusted
|
||||
identity.}
|
||||
|
||||
Freedom 4 regards your right to construct your own identity There is
|
||||
increasing pressure to forbid anonymity, and yet trustworthy communications
|
||||
remain rare. While it is essential to liberty that individuals be able to
|
||||
remain anonymous in the online public sphere, it is also essential that they
|
||||
be able to construct and maintain persistent, verifiable identities. Such
|
||||
identities might bear a legal name, a common name, or an avatar that masks
|
||||
one's corporeal self -- individuals could have many such identities, and
|
||||
switch between them at will. Clear delineation between anonymous,
|
||||
pseudonymous, and onymous actors would enable all of us to better asses the
|
||||
trustworthiness of others on the network.
|
||||
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\end{document}
|
||||
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
|
||||
\usepackage{graphicx}
|
||||
\usepackage{geometry}
|
||||
|
||||
\title{\huge \bf Free Network Definition}
|
||||
\date{}
|
||||
|
||||
\newcommand{\statement}[1]{\textbf{#1} \medskip}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{document}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[t]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[scale=0.4]{thefnf-logo.png}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\maketitle
|
||||
\thispagestyle{empty}
|
||||
\pagestyle{empty}
|
||||
|
||||
\statement{The fundamental dialectic of our struggle is this: will we be
|
||||
enslaved by our technology, or liberated by it? It was in cognizance of this
|
||||
notion, and in service to our collective freedom that the Free Software
|
||||
Movement was born. It is in this spirit that we aim here to define exactly
|
||||
what it means to say that a network is free. We hope that the existence of
|
||||
this definition will help illuminate the path to a more just world.}
|
||||
\\
|
||||
\\
|
||||
Our intention is to build communications systems that are owned by the people
|
||||
that use them, that allow participants to own their own data, and that use
|
||||
end-to-end encryption and cryptographic trust mechanisms to assure privacy. We
|
||||
call such systems `free networks' and they are characterized by the following
|
||||
five freedoms:
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item \textbf{Freedom 0) \\
|
||||
The freedom to participate in the network.}
|
||||
|
||||
Freedom 0 regards your right to organize cooperative networks. Conventional
|
||||
networks are characterized by a distinction between provider and user. This
|
||||
mode of organization encourages network operation in the service of
|
||||
self-interest. The provider builds and owns the infrastructure, and the user
|
||||
pays for access. In a free network, however, nodes connect to one another,
|
||||
rather than to a single, monolithic provider. By nature of its design, a free
|
||||
network is owned by those that make use of it. Participants act as providers
|
||||
and users as the same time, and growth is auto-distributed by treating any
|
||||
profits as investment. In this way, those that join the network are able to
|
||||
become owners. This mode of organization encourages network operation in the
|
||||
service of the common good.
|
||||
|
||||
\newpage
|
||||
\item \textbf{Freedom 1) \\
|
||||
The freedom to determine where one's bits are stored.}
|
||||
|
||||
Freedom 1 regards your right to own the material stores of your data.
|
||||
Conventional networks encourage (if not force) their participants to store
|
||||
their data in machines which are under the administrative auspices of an
|
||||
external service provider or host. Most folks are not able to serve data from
|
||||
their homes. Participants ought to be free to store their own data (so that
|
||||
it is under their care) without sacrificing their ability to publish it.
|
||||
|
||||
\item \textbf{Freedom 2) \\
|
||||
The freedom to determine the parties with whom one's bits are shared.}
|
||||
|
||||
Freedom 2 regards your right to control access to your data. Data mining and
|
||||
the monetization of sharing has become common practice. Participants should
|
||||
be free to choose those with whom they would like to share a given piece of
|
||||
information. Only someone who owns their own data can fully exercise this
|
||||
freedom, but it is an issue regardless of where the relevant bits are stored.
|
||||
|
||||
\item \textbf{Freedom 3) \\
|
||||
The freedom to transmit bits to one's peers without the prospect of
|
||||
interference, interception or censorship.}
|
||||
|
||||
Freedom 3 regards the right to speak freely with your peers. Information
|
||||
flows in conventional networks are routinely and intentionally intercepted,
|
||||
obstructed, and censored. This is done at the behest of corporate and state
|
||||
actors around the world. In a free network, private communications should
|
||||
remain unexamined from the time they enter the network until the time they
|
||||
reach their destination.
|
||||
|
||||
\item \textbf{Freedom 4) \\
|
||||
The freedom to maintain anonymity, or to present a unique, trusted
|
||||
identity.}
|
||||
|
||||
Freedom 4 regards your right to construct your own identity There is
|
||||
increasing pressure to forbid anonymity, and yet trustworthy communications
|
||||
remain rare. While it is essential to liberty that individuals be able to
|
||||
remain anonymous in the online public sphere, it is also essential that they
|
||||
be able to construct and maintain persistent, verifiable identities. Such
|
||||
identities might bear a legal name, a common name, or an avatar that masks
|
||||
one's corporeal self -- individuals could have many such identities, and
|
||||
switch between them at will. Clear delineation between anonymous,
|
||||
pseudonymous, and onymous actors would enable all of us to better asses the
|
||||
trustworthiness of others on the network.
|
||||
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\end{document}
|
||||
|
@@ -1,79 +1,79 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: '**Free Network Definition**'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
**The fundamental dialectic of our struggle is this: will we be enslaved
|
||||
by our technology, or liberated by it?
|
||||
|
||||
It was in cognizance of this
|
||||
notion, and in service to our collective freedom that the Free Software
|
||||
Movement was born. It is in this spirit that we aim here to define
|
||||
exactly what it means to say that a network is free. We hope that the
|
||||
existence of this definition will help illuminate the path to a more
|
||||
just world.
|
||||
|
||||
Our intention is to build communications systems that are owned by the
|
||||
people that use them, that allow participants to own their own data, and
|
||||
that use end-to-end encryption and cryptographic trust mechanisms to
|
||||
assure privacy. We call such systems 'free networks' and they are
|
||||
characterized by the following five freedoms:
|
||||
|
||||
- Freedom 0: The freedom to participate in the network.
|
||||
|
||||
Freedom 0 regards your right to organize cooperative networks.
|
||||
Conventional networks are characterized by a distinction between
|
||||
provider and user. This mode of organization encourages network
|
||||
operation in the service of self-interest. The provider builds and
|
||||
owns the infrastructure, and the user pays for access. In a free
|
||||
network, however, nodes connect to one another, rather than to a
|
||||
single, monolithic provider. By nature of its design, a free network
|
||||
is owned by those that make use of it. Participants act as providers
|
||||
and users as the same time, and growth is auto-distributed by
|
||||
treating any profits as investment. In this way, those that join the
|
||||
network are able to become owners. This mode of organization
|
||||
encourages network operation in the service of the common good.
|
||||
|
||||
- Freedom 1: The freedom to determine where one's data is stored.
|
||||
|
||||
Freedom 1 regards your right to own the material stores of your
|
||||
data. Conventional networks encourage (if not force) their
|
||||
participants to store their data in machines which are under the
|
||||
administrative auspices of an external service provider or host.
|
||||
Most folks are not able to serve data from their homes. Participants
|
||||
ought to be free to store their own data (so that it is under their
|
||||
care) without sacrificing their ability to publish it.
|
||||
|
||||
- Freedom 2: The freedom to determine the parties with whom one's data is shared.
|
||||
|
||||
Freedom 2 regards your right to control access to your data. Data
|
||||
mining and the monetization of sharing has become common practice.
|
||||
Participants should be free to choose those with whom they would
|
||||
like to share a given piece of information. Only someone who owns
|
||||
their own data can fully exercise this freedom, but it is an issue
|
||||
regardless of where the relevant bits are stored.
|
||||
|
||||
- Freedom 3: The freedom to transmit data to one's peers without the prospect of
|
||||
interference, interception or censorship.**
|
||||
|
||||
Freedom 3 regards the right to speak freely with your peers.
|
||||
Information flows in conventional networks are routinely and
|
||||
intentionally intercepted, obstructed, and censored. This is done at
|
||||
the behest of corporate and state actors around the world. In a free
|
||||
network, private communications should remain unexamined from the
|
||||
time they enter the network until the time they reach their
|
||||
destination.
|
||||
|
||||
- Freedom 4: The freedom to maintain anonymity, or to present a unique, trusted identity.
|
||||
|
||||
Freedom 4 regards your right to construct your own identity There is
|
||||
increasing pressure to forbid anonymity, and yet trustworthy
|
||||
communications remain rare. While it is essential to liberty that
|
||||
individuals be able to remain anonymous in the online public sphere,
|
||||
it is also essential that they be able to construct and maintain
|
||||
persistent, verifiable identities. Such identities might bear a
|
||||
legal name, a common name, or an avatar that masks one's corporeal
|
||||
self -- individuals could have many such identities, and switch
|
||||
between them at will. Clear delineation between anonymous,
|
||||
pseudonymous, and onymous actors would enable all of us to better
|
||||
asses the trustworthiness of others on the network.
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: '**Free Network Definition**'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
**The fundamental dialectic of our struggle is this: will we be enslaved
|
||||
by our technology, or liberated by it?
|
||||
|
||||
It was in cognizance of this
|
||||
notion, and in service to our collective freedom that the Free Software
|
||||
Movement was born. It is in this spirit that we aim here to define
|
||||
exactly what it means to say that a network is free. We hope that the
|
||||
existence of this definition will help illuminate the path to a more
|
||||
just world.
|
||||
|
||||
Our intention is to build communications systems that are owned by the
|
||||
people that use them, that allow participants to own their own data, and
|
||||
that use end-to-end encryption and cryptographic trust mechanisms to
|
||||
assure privacy. We call such systems 'free networks' and they are
|
||||
characterized by the following five freedoms:
|
||||
|
||||
- Freedom 0: The freedom to participate in the network.
|
||||
|
||||
Freedom 0 regards your right to organize cooperative networks.
|
||||
Conventional networks are characterized by a distinction between
|
||||
provider and user. This mode of organization encourages network
|
||||
operation in the service of self-interest. The provider builds and
|
||||
owns the infrastructure, and the user pays for access. In a free
|
||||
network, however, nodes connect to one another, rather than to a
|
||||
single, monolithic provider. By nature of its design, a free network
|
||||
is owned by those that make use of it. Participants act as providers
|
||||
and users as the same time, and growth is auto-distributed by
|
||||
treating any profits as investment. In this way, those that join the
|
||||
network are able to become owners. This mode of organization
|
||||
encourages network operation in the service of the common good.
|
||||
|
||||
- Freedom 1: The freedom to determine where one's data is stored.
|
||||
|
||||
Freedom 1 regards your right to own the material stores of your
|
||||
data. Conventional networks encourage (if not force) their
|
||||
participants to store their data in machines which are under the
|
||||
administrative auspices of an external service provider or host.
|
||||
Most folks are not able to serve data from their homes. Participants
|
||||
ought to be free to store their own data (so that it is under their
|
||||
care) without sacrificing their ability to publish it.
|
||||
|
||||
- Freedom 2: The freedom to determine the parties with whom one's data is shared.
|
||||
|
||||
Freedom 2 regards your right to control access to your data. Data
|
||||
mining and the monetization of sharing has become common practice.
|
||||
Participants should be free to choose those with whom they would
|
||||
like to share a given piece of information. Only someone who owns
|
||||
their own data can fully exercise this freedom, but it is an issue
|
||||
regardless of where the relevant bits are stored.
|
||||
|
||||
- Freedom 3: The freedom to transmit data to one's peers without the prospect of
|
||||
interference, interception or censorship.**
|
||||
|
||||
Freedom 3 regards the right to speak freely with your peers.
|
||||
Information flows in conventional networks are routinely and
|
||||
intentionally intercepted, obstructed, and censored. This is done at
|
||||
the behest of corporate and state actors around the world. In a free
|
||||
network, private communications should remain unexamined from the
|
||||
time they enter the network until the time they reach their
|
||||
destination.
|
||||
|
||||
- Freedom 4: The freedom to maintain anonymity, or to present a unique, trusted identity.
|
||||
|
||||
Freedom 4 regards your right to construct your own identity There is
|
||||
increasing pressure to forbid anonymity, and yet trustworthy
|
||||
communications remain rare. While it is essential to liberty that
|
||||
individuals be able to remain anonymous in the online public sphere,
|
||||
it is also essential that they be able to construct and maintain
|
||||
persistent, verifiable identities. Such identities might bear a
|
||||
legal name, a common name, or an avatar that masks one's corporeal
|
||||
self -- individuals could have many such identities, and switch
|
||||
between them at will. Clear delineation between anonymous,
|
||||
pseudonymous, and onymous actors would enable all of us to better
|
||||
asses the trustworthiness of others on the network.
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user