openwrt/target/linux/ath79/dts/qca9561_tplink_archer-c6x.dtsi

91 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later OR MIT
#include "qca956x.dtsi"
#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
/ {
aliases {
led-boot = &led_power;
led-failsafe = &led_power;
led-running = &led_power;
led-upgrade = &led_power;
label-mac-device = &eth1;
};
keys {
compatible = "gpio-keys";
wifi {
label = "WiFi button";
linux,code = <KEY_RFKILL>;
gpios = <&gpio 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
reset {
label = "Reset button";
linux,code = <KEY_RESTART>;
gpios = <&gpio 21 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
};
ath79: add support for TP-Link Archer C60 v3 TP-Link Archer C60 v3 is a dual-band AC1350 router, based on Qualcomm/Atheros QCA9561 + QCA9886. It seems to be identical to the v2 revision, except that it lacks a WPS LED and has different GPIO for amber WAN LED. Specification: - 775/650/258 MHz (CPU/DDR/AHB) - 64 MB of RAM (DDR2) - 8 MB of FLASH (SPI NOR) - 3T3R 2.4 GHz - 2T2R 5 GHz - 5x 10/100 Mbps Ethernet - 6x LED, 2x button - UART header on PCB Flash instruction (WebUI): Download *-factory.bin image and upload it via the firmwary upgrade function of the stock firmware WebUI. Flash instruction (TFTP): 1. Set PC to fixed IP address 192.168.0.66 2. Download *-factory.bin image and rename it to tp_recovery.bin 3. Start a tftp server with the file tp_recovery.bin in its root directory 4. Turn off the router 5. Press and hold reset button 6. Turn on router with the reset button pressed and wait ~15 seconds 7. Release the reset button and after a short time the firmware should be transferred from the tftp server 8. Wait ~30 second to complete recovery While TFTP works for OpenWrt images, my device didn't accept the only available official firmware "Archer C60(EU)_V3.0_190115.bin". In contrast to earlier revisions (v2), the v3 contains the (same) MAC address twice, once in 0x1fa08 and again in 0x1fb08. While the partition-table on the device refers to the latter, the firmware image contains a different partition-table for that region: name device firmware factory-boot 0x00000-0x1fb00 0x00000-0x1fa00 default-mac 0x1fb00-0x1fd00 0x1fa00-0x1fc00 pin 0x1fd00-0x1fe00 0x1fc00-0x1fd00 product-info 0x1fe00-0x1ff00 0x1fd00-0x1ff00 device-id 0x1ff00-0x20000 0x1ff00-0x20000 While the MAC address is present twice, other data like the PIN isn't, so with the partitioning from the firmware image the PIN on the device would actually be outside of its partition. Consequently, the patch uses the MAC location from the device (which is the same as for the v2). Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-02-12 13:43:15 +00:00
leds: leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
led_power: power {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "green:power";
gpios = <&gpio 16 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
default-state = "on";
};
wlan2g {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "green:wlan2g";
gpios = <&gpio 17 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
linux,default-trigger = "phy1tpt";
};
wlan5g {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "green:wlan5g";
gpios = <&gpio 18 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
linux,default-trigger = "phy0tpt";
};
wan_green {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "green:wan";
gpios = <&gpio 20 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
lan {
ath79: remove model name from LED labels Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme modelname:color:function However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in several aspects: - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used, but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track and justify even for core-developers - Having model-based components will not allow to share identical LED definitions in DTSI files - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from ar71xx where this was even more messy Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and function properties separately. However, the implementation does not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or match our requirements in the foreseeable future. However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal device, like "phy1:amber:status". With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips), and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely useless subject to take care of for device support review and maintenance. To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple migration routine is added unconditionally. Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there. Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-26 15:31:17 +00:00
label = "green:lan";
gpios = <&gpio 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
};
};
&pcie {
status = "okay";
};
&eth0 {
status = "okay";
phy-handle = <&swphy4>;
mtd-mac-address = <&info 0x8>;
mtd-mac-address-increment = <1>;
};
&eth1 {
status = "okay";
mtd-mac-address = <&info 0x8>;
};
&wmac {
status = "okay";
mtd-cal-data = <&art 0x1000>;
mtd-mac-address = <&info 0x8>;
};