mirror of
https://github.com/corda/corda.git
synced 2024-12-24 23:26:48 +00:00
409cefd467
* CORDA-827: more doc changes * CORDA-827: more doc changes
257 lines
12 KiB
ReStructuredText
257 lines
12 KiB
ReStructuredText
Client RPC
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
There are multiple ways to interact with a node from a *client program*, but if your client is written in a JVM
|
|
compatible language the easiest way to do so is using the client library. The library connects to your running
|
|
node using a message queue protocol and then provides a simple RPC interface to interact with it. You make calls
|
|
on a Java object as normal, and the marshalling back and forth is handled for you.
|
|
|
|
The starting point for the client library is the `CordaRPCClient`_ class. This provides a ``start`` method that
|
|
returns a `CordaRPCConnection`_, holding an implementation of the `CordaRPCOps`_ that may be accessed with ``proxy``
|
|
in Kotlin and ``getProxy()`` in Java. Observables that are returned by RPCs can be subscribed to in order to receive
|
|
an ongoing stream of updates from the node. More detail on how to use this is provided in the docs for the proxy method.
|
|
|
|
.. warning:: The returned `CordaRPCConnection`_ is somewhat expensive to create and consumes a small amount of
|
|
server side resources. When you're done with it, call ``close`` on it. Alternatively you may use the ``use``
|
|
method on `CordaRPCClient`_ which cleans up automatically after the passed in lambda finishes. Don't create
|
|
a new proxy for every call you make - reuse an existing one.
|
|
|
|
For a brief tutorial on how one can use the RPC API see :doc:`tutorial-clientrpc-api`.
|
|
|
|
RPC permissions
|
|
---------------
|
|
If a node's owner needs to interact with their node via RPC (e.g. to read the contents of the node's storage), they
|
|
must define one or more RPC users. Each user is authenticated with a username and password, and is assigned a set of
|
|
permissions that RPC can use for fine-grain access control.
|
|
|
|
These users are added to the node's ``node.conf`` file.
|
|
|
|
The simplest way of adding an RPC user is to include it in the ``rpcUsers`` list:
|
|
|
|
.. container:: codeset
|
|
|
|
.. sourcecode:: groovy
|
|
|
|
rpcUsers=[
|
|
{
|
|
username=exampleUser
|
|
password=examplePass
|
|
permissions=[]
|
|
}
|
|
...
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
Users need permissions to invoke any RPC call. By default, nothing is allowed. These permissions are specified as follows:
|
|
|
|
.. container:: codeset
|
|
|
|
.. sourcecode:: groovy
|
|
|
|
rpcUsers=[
|
|
{
|
|
username=exampleUser
|
|
password=examplePass
|
|
permissions=[
|
|
"StartFlow.net.corda.flows.ExampleFlow1",
|
|
"StartFlow.net.corda.flows.ExampleFlow2"
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
...
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
Permissions Syntax
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
Fine grained permissions allow a user to invoke a specific RPC operation, or to start a specific flow. The syntax is:
|
|
|
|
- to start a specific flow: ``StartFlow.<fully qualified flow name>`` e.g., ``StartFlow.net.corda.flows.ExampleFlow1``.
|
|
- to invoke a RPC operation: ``InvokeRpc.<rpc method name>`` e.g., ``InvokeRpc.nodeInfo``.
|
|
.. note:: Permission ``InvokeRpc.startFlow`` allows a user to initiate all flows.
|
|
|
|
RPC security management
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
Setting ``rpcUsers`` provides a simple way of granting RPC permissions to a fixed set of users, but has some
|
|
obvious shortcomings. To support use cases aiming for higher security and flexibility, Corda offers additional security
|
|
features such as:
|
|
|
|
* Fetching users credentials and permissions from an external data source (e.g.: a remote RDBMS), with optional in-memory
|
|
caching. In particular, this allows credentials and permissions to be updated externally without requiring nodes to be
|
|
restarted.
|
|
* Password stored in hash-encrypted form. This is regarded as must-have when security is a concern. Corda currently supports
|
|
a flexible password hash format conforming to the Modular Crypt Format provided by the `Apache Shiro framework <https://shiro.apache.org/static/1.2.5/apidocs/org/apache/shiro/crypto/hash/format/Shiro1CryptFormat.html>`_
|
|
|
|
These features are controlled by a set of options nested in the ``security`` field of ``node.conf``.
|
|
The following example shows how to configure retrieval of users credentials and permissions from a remote database with
|
|
passwords in hash-encrypted format and enable in-memory caching of users data:
|
|
|
|
.. container:: codeset
|
|
|
|
.. sourcecode:: groovy
|
|
|
|
security = {
|
|
authService = {
|
|
dataSource = {
|
|
type = "DB",
|
|
passwordEncryption = "SHIRO_1_CRYPT",
|
|
connection = {
|
|
jdbcUrl = "<jdbc connection string>"
|
|
username = "<db username>"
|
|
password = "<db user password>"
|
|
driverClassName = "<JDBC driver>"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
options = {
|
|
cache = {
|
|
expireAfterSecs = 120
|
|
maxEntries = 10000
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
It is also possible to have a static list of users embedded in the ``security`` structure by specifying a ``dataSource``
|
|
of ``INMEMORY`` type:
|
|
|
|
.. container:: codeset
|
|
|
|
.. sourcecode:: groovy
|
|
|
|
security = {
|
|
authService = {
|
|
dataSource = {
|
|
type = "INMEMORY",
|
|
users = [
|
|
{
|
|
username = "<username>",
|
|
password = "<password>",
|
|
permissions = ["<permission 1>", "<permission 2>", ...]
|
|
},
|
|
...
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
.. warning:: A valid configuration cannot specify both the ``rpcUsers`` and ``security`` fields. Doing so will trigger
|
|
an exception at node startup.
|
|
|
|
Authentication/authorisation data
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
The ``dataSource`` structure defines the data provider supplying credentials and permissions for users. There exist two
|
|
supported types of such data source, identified by the ``dataSource.type`` field:
|
|
|
|
:INMEMORY: A static list of user credentials and permissions specified by the ``users`` field.
|
|
|
|
:DB: An external RDBMS accessed via the JDBC connection described by ``connection``. Note that, unlike the ``INMEMORY``
|
|
case, in a user database permissions are assigned to *roles* rather than individual users. The current implementation
|
|
expects the database to store data according to the following schema:
|
|
|
|
- Table ``users`` containing columns ``username`` and ``password``. The ``username`` column *must have unique values*.
|
|
- Table ``user_roles`` containing columns ``username`` and ``role_name`` associating a user to a set of *roles*.
|
|
- Table ``roles_permissions`` containing columns ``role_name`` and ``permission`` associating a role to a set of
|
|
permission strings.
|
|
|
|
.. note:: There is no prescription on the SQL type of each column (although our tests were conducted on ``username`` and
|
|
``role_name`` declared of SQL type ``VARCHAR`` and ``password`` of ``TEXT`` type). It is also possible to have extra columns
|
|
in each table alongside the expected ones.
|
|
|
|
Password encryption
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
Storing passwords in plain text is discouraged in applications where security is critical. Passwords are assumed
|
|
to be in plain format by default, unless a different format is specified by the ``passwordEncryption`` field, like:
|
|
|
|
.. container:: codeset
|
|
|
|
.. sourcecode:: groovy
|
|
|
|
passwordEncryption = SHIRO_1_CRYPT
|
|
|
|
``SHIRO_1_CRYPT`` identifies the `Apache Shiro fully reversible
|
|
Modular Crypt Format <https://shiro.apache.org/static/1.2.5/apidocs/org/apache/shiro/crypto/hash/format/Shiro1CryptFormat.html>`_,
|
|
it is currently the only non-plain password hash-encryption format supported. Hash-encrypted passwords in this
|
|
format can be produced by using the `Apache Shiro Hasher command line tool <https://shiro.apache.org/command-line-hasher.html>`_.
|
|
|
|
Caching user accounts data
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
A cache layer on top of the external data source of users credentials and permissions can significantly improve
|
|
performances in some cases, with the disadvantage of causing a (controllable) delay in picking up updates to the underlying data.
|
|
Caching is disabled by default, it can be enabled by defining the ``options.cache`` field in ``security.authService``,
|
|
for example:
|
|
|
|
.. container:: codeset
|
|
|
|
.. sourcecode:: groovy
|
|
|
|
options = {
|
|
cache = {
|
|
expireAfterSecs = 120
|
|
maxEntries = 10000
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
This will enable a non-persistent cache contained in the node's memory with maximum number of entries set to ``maxEntries``
|
|
where entries are expired and refreshed after ``expireAfterSecs`` seconds.
|
|
|
|
Observables
|
|
-----------
|
|
The RPC system handles observables in a special way. When a method returns an observable, whether directly or
|
|
as a sub-object of the response object graph, an observable is created on the client to match the one on the
|
|
server. Objects emitted by the server-side observable are pushed onto a queue which is then drained by the client.
|
|
The returned observable may even emit object graphs with even more observables in them, and it all works as you
|
|
would expect.
|
|
|
|
This feature comes with a cost: the server must queue up objects emitted by the server-side observable until you
|
|
download them. Note that the server side observation buffer is bounded, once it fills up the client is considered
|
|
slow and kicked. You are expected to subscribe to all the observables returned, otherwise client-side memory starts
|
|
filling up as observations come in. If you don't want an observable then subscribe then unsubscribe immediately to
|
|
clear the client-side buffers and to stop the server from streaming. If your app quits then server side resources
|
|
will be freed automatically.
|
|
|
|
.. warning:: If you leak an observable on the client side and it gets garbage collected, you will get a warning
|
|
printed to the logs and the observable will be unsubscribed for you. But don't rely on this, as garbage collection
|
|
is non-deterministic.
|
|
|
|
Futures
|
|
-------
|
|
A method can also return a ``ListenableFuture`` in its object graph and it will be treated in a similar manner to
|
|
observables. Calling the ``cancel`` method on the future will unsubscribe it from any future value and release any resources.
|
|
|
|
Versioning
|
|
----------
|
|
The client RPC protocol is versioned using the node's Platform Version (see :doc:`versioning`). When a proxy is created
|
|
the server is queried for its version, and you can specify your minimum requirement. Methods added in later versions
|
|
are tagged with the ``@RPCSinceVersion`` annotation. If you try to use a method that the server isn't advertising support
|
|
of, an ``UnsupportedOperationException`` is thrown. If you want to know the version of the server, just use the
|
|
``protocolVersion`` property (i.e. ``getProtocolVersion`` in Java).
|
|
|
|
Thread safety
|
|
-------------
|
|
A proxy is thread safe, blocking, and allows multiple RPCs to be in flight at once. Any observables that are returned and
|
|
you subscribe to will have objects emitted in order on a background thread pool. Each Observable stream is tied to a single
|
|
thread, however note that two separate Observables may invoke their respective callbacks on different threads.
|
|
|
|
Error handling
|
|
--------------
|
|
If something goes wrong with the RPC infrastructure itself, an ``RPCException`` is thrown. If you call a method that
|
|
requires a higher version of the protocol than the server supports, ``UnsupportedOperationException`` is thrown.
|
|
Otherwise, if the server implementation throws an exception, that exception is serialised and rethrown on the client
|
|
side as if it was thrown from inside the called RPC method. These exceptions can be caught as normal.
|
|
|
|
Wire protocol
|
|
-------------
|
|
The client RPC wire protocol is defined and documented in ``net/corda/client/rpc/RPCApi.kt``.
|
|
|
|
Whitelisting classes with the Corda node
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
CorDapps must whitelist any classes used over RPC with Corda's serialization framework, unless they are whitelisted by
|
|
default in ``DefaultWhitelist``. The whitelisting is done either via the plugin architecture or by using the
|
|
``@CordaSerializable`` annotation. See :doc:`serialization`. An example is shown in :doc:`tutorial-clientrpc-api`.
|
|
|
|
.. _CordaRPCClient: api/javadoc/net/corda/client/rpc/CordaRPCClient.html
|
|
.. _CordaRPCOps: api/javadoc/net/corda/core/messaging/CordaRPCOps.html
|
|
.. _CordaRPCConnection: api/javadoc/net/corda/client/rpc/CordaRPCConnection.html
|