mirror of
https://github.com/corda/corda.git
synced 2024-12-25 15:41:10 +00:00
237 lines
9.5 KiB
ReStructuredText
237 lines
9.5 KiB
ReStructuredText
Default Class Evolution
|
|
=======================
|
|
|
|
.. contents::
|
|
|
|
Whilst more complex evolutionary modifications to classes require annotating, Corda's serialization
|
|
framework supports several minor modifications to classes without any external modification save
|
|
the actual code changes. These are:
|
|
|
|
#. Adding nullable properties
|
|
#. Adding non nullable properties if, and only if, an annotated constructor is provided
|
|
#. Removing properties
|
|
#. Reordering constructor parameters
|
|
|
|
Adding Nullable Properties
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
|
|
The serialization framework allows nullable properties to be freely added. For example:
|
|
|
|
.. container:: codeset
|
|
|
|
.. sourcecode:: kotlin
|
|
|
|
// Initial instance of the class
|
|
data class Example1 (val a: Int, b: String) // (Version A)
|
|
|
|
// Class post addition of property c
|
|
data class Example1 (val a: Int, b: String, c: Int?) // (Version B)
|
|
|
|
A node with version A of class ``Example1`` will be able to deserialize a blob serialized by a node with it
|
|
at version B as the framework would treat it as a removed property.
|
|
|
|
A node with the class at version B will be able to deserialize a serialized version A of ``Example1`` without
|
|
any modification as the property is nullable and will thus provide null to the constructor.
|
|
|
|
Adding Non Nullable Properties
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
If a non null property is added, unlike nullable properties, some additional code is required for
|
|
this to work. Consider a similar example to our nullable example above
|
|
|
|
.. container:: codeset
|
|
|
|
.. sourcecode:: kotlin
|
|
|
|
// Initial instance of the class
|
|
data class Example2 (val a: Int, b: String) // (Version A)
|
|
|
|
// Class post addition of property c
|
|
data class Example1 (val a: Int, b: String, c: Int) { // (Version B)
|
|
@DeprecatedConstructorForDeserialization(1)
|
|
constructor (a: Int, b: String) : this(a, b, 0) // 0 has been determined as a sensible default
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
For this to work we have had to add a new constructor that allows nodes with the class at version B to create an
|
|
instance from serialised form of that class from an older version, in this case version A as per our example
|
|
above. A sensible default for the missing value is provided for instantiation of the non null property.
|
|
|
|
.. note:: The ``@DeprecatedConstructorForDeserialization`` annotation is important, this signifies to the
|
|
serialization framework that this constructor should be considered for building instances of the
|
|
object when evolution is required.
|
|
|
|
Furthermore, the integer parameter passed to the constructor if the annotation indicates a precedence
|
|
order, see the discussion below.
|
|
|
|
As before, instances of the class at version A will be able to deserialize serialized forms of example B as it
|
|
will simply treat them as if the property has been removed (as from its perspective, they will have been).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Constructor Versioning
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
If, over time, multiple non nullable properties are added, then a class will potentially have to be able
|
|
to deserialize a number of different forms of the class. Being able to select the correct constructor is
|
|
important to ensure the maximum information is extracted.
|
|
|
|
Consider this example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. container:: codeset
|
|
|
|
.. sourcecode:: kotlin
|
|
|
|
// The original version of the class
|
|
data class Example3 (val a: Int, val b: Int)
|
|
|
|
.. container:: codeset
|
|
|
|
.. sourcecode:: kotlin
|
|
|
|
// The first alteration, property c added
|
|
data class Example3 (val a: Int, val b: Int, val c: Int)
|
|
|
|
.. container:: codeset
|
|
|
|
.. sourcecode:: kotlin
|
|
|
|
// The second alteration, property d added
|
|
data class Example3 (val a: Int, val b: Int, val c: Int, val d: Int)
|
|
|
|
.. container:: codeset
|
|
|
|
.. sourcecode:: kotlin
|
|
|
|
// The third alteration, and how it currently exists, property e added
|
|
data class Example3 (val a: Int, val b: Int, val c: Int, val d: Int, val: Int e) {
|
|
// NOTE: version number purposefully omitted from annotation for demonstration purposes
|
|
@DeprecatedConstructorForDeserialization
|
|
constructor (a: Int, b: Int) : this(a, b, -1, -1, -1) // alt constructor 1
|
|
@DeprecatedConstructorForDeserialization
|
|
constructor (a: Int, b: Int, c: Int) : this(a, b, c, -1, -1) // alt constructor 2
|
|
@DeprecatedConstructorForDeserialization
|
|
constructor (a: Int, b: Int, c: Int, d) : this(a, b, c, d, -1) // alt constructor 3
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
In this case, the deserializer has to be able to deserialize instances of class ``Example3`` that were serialized as, for example:
|
|
|
|
.. container:: codeset
|
|
|
|
.. sourcecode:: kotlin
|
|
|
|
Example3 (1, 2) // example I
|
|
Example3 (1, 2, 3) // example II
|
|
Example3 (1, 2, 3, 4) // example III
|
|
Example3 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) // example IV
|
|
|
|
Examples I, II, and III would require evolution and thus selection of constructor. Now, with no versioning applied there
|
|
is ambiguity as to which constructor should be used. For example, example II could use 'alt constructor 2' which matches
|
|
it's arguments most tightly or 'alt constructor 1' and not instantiate parameter c.
|
|
|
|
``constructor (a: Int, b: Int, c: Int) : this(a, b, c, -1, -1)``
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
|
|
``constructor (a: Int, b: Int) : this(a, b, -1, -1, -1)``
|
|
|
|
Whilst it may seem trivial which should be picked, it is still ambiguous, thus we use a versioning number in the constructor
|
|
annotation which gives a strict precedence order to constructor selection. Therefore, the proper form of the example would
|
|
be:
|
|
|
|
.. container:: codeset
|
|
|
|
.. sourcecode:: kotlin
|
|
|
|
// The third alteration, and how it currently exists, property e added
|
|
data class Example3 (val a: Int, val b: Int, val c: Int, val d: Int, val: Int e) {
|
|
@DeprecatedConstructorForDeserialization(1)
|
|
constructor (a: Int, b: Int) : this(a, b, -1, -1, -1) // alt constructor 1
|
|
@DeprecatedConstructorForDeserialization(2)
|
|
constructor (a: Int, b: Int, c: Int) : this(a, b, c, -1, -1) // alt constructor 2
|
|
@DeprecatedConstructorForDeserialization(3)
|
|
constructor (a: Int, b: Int, c: Int, d) : this(a, b, c, d, -1) // alt constructor 3
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Constructors are selected in strict descending order taking the one that enables construction. So, deserializing examples I to IV would
|
|
give us:
|
|
|
|
.. container:: codeset
|
|
|
|
.. sourcecode:: kotlin
|
|
|
|
Example3 (1, 2, -1, -1, -1) // example I
|
|
Example3 (1, 2, 3, -1, -1) // example II
|
|
Example3 (1, 2, 3, 4, -1) // example III
|
|
Example3 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) // example IV
|
|
|
|
Removing Properties
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
Property removal is effectively a mirror of adding properties (both nullable and non nullable) given that this functionality
|
|
is required to facilitate the addition of properties. When this state is detected by the serialization framework, properties
|
|
that don't have matching parameters in the main constructor are simply omitted from object construction.
|
|
|
|
.. container:: codeset
|
|
|
|
.. sourcecode:: kotlin
|
|
|
|
// Initial instance of the class
|
|
data class Example4 (val a: Int?, val b: String?, val c: Int?) // (Version A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Class post removal of property 'a'
|
|
data class Example4 (val b: String?, c: Int?) // (Version B)
|
|
|
|
|
|
In practice, what this means is removing nullable properties is possible. However, removing non nullable properties isn't because
|
|
a node receiving a message containing a serialized form of an object with fewer properties than it requires for construction has
|
|
no capacity to guess at what values should or could be used as sensible defaults. When those properties are nullable it simply sets
|
|
them to null.
|
|
|
|
Reordering Constructor Parameter Order
|
|
--------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Properties (in Kotlin this corresponds to constructor parameters) may be reordered freely. The evolution serializer will create a
|
|
mapping between how a class was serialized and its current constructor parameter order. This is important to our AMQP framework as it
|
|
constructs objects using their primary (or annotated) constructor. The ordering of whose parameters will have determined the way
|
|
an object's properties were serialised into the byte stream.
|
|
|
|
For an illustrative example consider a simple class:
|
|
|
|
.. Container:: codeset
|
|
|
|
.. sourcecode:: kotlin
|
|
|
|
data class Example5 (val a: Int, val b: String)
|
|
|
|
val e = Example5(999, "hello")
|
|
|
|
When we serialize ``e`` its properties will be encoded in order of its primary constructors parameters, so:
|
|
|
|
``999,hello``
|
|
|
|
Were those parameters to be reordered post serialisation then deserializing, without evolution, would fail with a basic
|
|
type error as we'd attempt to create the new value of ``Example5`` with the values provided in the wrong order:
|
|
|
|
.. Container:: codeset
|
|
|
|
.. sourcecode:: kotlin
|
|
|
|
// changed post serialisation
|
|
data class Example5 (val b: String, val a: Int)
|
|
|
|
.. sourcecode:: shell
|
|
|
|
| 999 | hello | <--- Extract properties to pass to constructor from byte stream
|
|
| |
|
|
| +--------------------------+
|
|
+--------------------------+ |
|
|
| |
|
|
deserializedValue = Example5(999, "hello") <--- Resulting attempt at construction
|
|
| |
|
|
| \
|
|
| \ <--- Will clearly fail as 999 is not a
|
|
| \ string and hello is not an integer
|
|
data class Example5 (val b: String, val a: Int)
|
|
|