corda/docs/source/serialization.rst
Katelyn Baker cacdba872e
CORDA-908 - Support private properties in AMQP serialization (#2336)
CORDA-908 - Support private properties in AMQP serialization

* Review comments

* Fix tests

* Review Comments

* review comments

* review comments
2018-01-10 11:41:49 +00:00

18 KiB

Object serialization

What is serialization (and deserialization)?

Object serialization is the process of converting objects into a stream of bytes and, deserialization, the reverse process of creating objects from a stream of bytes. It takes place every time nodes pass objects to each other as messages, when objects are sent to or from RPC clients from the node, and when we store transactions in the database.

Whitelisting

In classic Java serialization, any class on the JVM classpath can be deserialized. This has shown to be a source of exploits and vulnerabilities by exploiting the large set of 3rd party libraries on the classpath as part of the dependencies of a JVM application and a carefully crafted stream of bytes to be deserialized. In Corda, we prevent just any class from being deserialized (and pro-actively during serialization) by insisting that each object's class belongs on a whitelist of allowed classes.

Classes get onto the whitelist via one of three mechanisms:

  1. Via the @CordaSerializable annotation. In order to whitelist a class, this annotation can be present on the class itself, on any of the super classes or on any interface implemented by the class or super classes or any interface extended by an interface implemented by the class or superclasses.
  2. By implementing the SerializationWhitelist interface and specifying a list of whitelist classes.
  3. Via the built in Corda whitelist (see the class DefaultWhitelist). Whilst this is not user editable, it does list common JDK classes that have been whitelisted for your convenience.

The annotation is the preferred method for whitelisting. An example is shown in tutorial-clientrpc-api. It's reproduced here as an example of both ways you can do this for a couple of example classes.

example-code/src/main/kotlin/net/corda/docs/ClientRpcTutorial.kt

Note

Several of the core interfaces at the heart of Corda are already annotated and so any classes that implement them will automatically be whitelisted. This includes Contract, ContractState and CommandData.

Warning

Java 8 Lambda expressions are not serializable except in flow checkpoints, and then not by default. The syntax to declare a serializable Lambda expression that will work with Corda is Runnable r = (Runnable & Serializable) () -> System.out.println("Hello World");, or Callable<String> c = (Callable<String> & Serializable) () -> "Hello World";.

Warning

We will be replacing the use of Kryo in the serialization framework and so additional changes here are likely.

AMQP

Originally Corda used a Kryo-based serialization scheme throughout for all serialization contexts. However, it was realised there was a compelling use case for the definition and development of a custom format based upon AMQP 1.0. The primary drivers for this were

  1. A desire to have a schema describing what has been serialized along-side the actual data:
    1. To assist with versioning, both in terms of being able to interpret long ago archived data (e.g. trades from a decade ago, long after the code has changed) and between differing code versions.
    2. To make it easier to write user interfaces that can navigate the serialized form of data.
    3. To support cross platform (non-JVM) interaction, where the format of a class file is not so easily interpreted.
  2. A desire to use a documented and static wire format that is platform independent, and is not subject to change with 3rd party library upgrades etc.
  3. A desire to support open-ended polymorphism, where the number of subclasses of a superclass can expand over time and do not need to be defined in the schema upfront, which is key to many Corda concepts, such as contract states.
  4. Increased security from deserialized objects being constructed through supported constructors rather than having data poked directly into their fields without an opportunity to validate consistency or intercept attempts to manipulate supposed invariants.

Delivering this is an ongoing effort by the Corda development team. At present, the Kryo-based format is still used by the RPC framework on both the client and server side. However, it is planned that this will move to the AMQP framework when ready.

The AMQP framework is currently used for:

  1. The peer to peer context, representing inter-node communication.
  2. The persistence layer, representing contract states persisted into the vault.

Finally, for the checkpointing of flows Corda will continue to use the existing Kryo scheme.

This separation of serialization schemes into different contexts allows us to use the most suitable framework for that context rather than attempting to force a one size fits all approach. Where Kryo is more suited to the serialization of a programs stack frames, being more flexible than our AMQP framework in what it can construct and serialize, that flexibility makes it exceptionally difficult to make secure. Conversely our AMQP framework allows us to concentrate on a robust a secure framework that can be reasoned about thus made safer with far fewer unforeseen security holes.

Note

Selection of serialization context should, for the most part, be opaque to CorDapp developers, the Corda framework selecting the correct context as confugred.

We describe here what is and will be supported in the Corda AMQP format from the perspective of CorDapp developers, to allow for CorDapps to take into consideration the future state. The AMQP serialization format will of course continue to apply the whitelisting functionality that is already in place and described in serialization.

Core Types

Here we describe the classes and interfaces that the AMQP serialization format will support.

Collection Types

The following collection types are supported. Any implementation of the following will be mapped to an implementation of the interface or class on the other end. e.g. If you, for example, use a Guava implementation of a collection it will deserialize as a different implementation, but will continue to adhere to the most specific of any of the following interfaces. You should use only these types as the declared types of fields and properties, and not the concrete implementation types. Collections must be used in their generic form, the generic type parameters will be included in the schema, and the elements type checked against the generic parameters when deserialized.

java.util.Collection
java.util.List
java.util.Set
java.util.SortedSet
java.util.NavigableSet
java.util.NonEmptySet
java.util.Map
java.util.SortedMap
java.util.NavigableMap

However, we will support the concrete implementation types below explicitly and also as the declared type of a field, as a convenience.

java.util.LinkedHashMap
java.util.TreeMap
java.util.EnumSet
java.util.EnumMap (but only if there is at least one entry)

JVM primitives

All the primitive types are supported.

boolean
byte
char
double
float
int
long
short

Arrays

We also support arrays of any supported type, primitive or otherwise.

JDK Types

The following types are supported from the JDK libraries.

java.io.InputStream

java.lang.Boolean
java.lang.Byte
java.lang.Character
java.lang.Class
java.lang.Double
java.lang.Float
java.lang.Integer
java.lang.Long
java.lang.Short
java.lang.StackTraceElement
java.lang.String
java.lang.StringBuffer

java.math.BigDecimal

java.security.PublicKey

java.time.DayOfWeek
java.time.Duration
java.time.Instant
java.time.LocalDate
java.time.LocalDateTime
java.time.LocalTime
java.time.Month
java.time.MonthDay
java.time.OffsetDateTime
java.time.OffsetTime
java.time.Period
java.time.YearMonth
java.time.Year
java.time.ZonedDateTime
java.time.ZonedId
java.time.ZoneOffset

java.util.BitSet
java.util.Currency
java.util.UUID

Third Party Types

The following 3rd party types are supported.

kotlin.Unit
kotlin.Pair

org.apache.activemq.artemis.api.core.SimpleString

Corda Types

Classes and interfaces in the Corda codebase annotated with @CordaSerializable are of course supported.

All Corda exceptions that are expected to be serialized inherit from CordaThrowable via either CordaException, for checked exceptions, or CordaRuntimeException, for unchecked exceptions. Any Throwable that is serialized but does not conform to CordaThrowable will be converted to a CordaRuntimeException with the original exception type and other properties retained within it.

Custom Types

Here are the rules to adhere to for support of your own types:

Classes

General Rules

  1. The class must be compiled with parameter names included in the .class file. This is the default in Kotlin but must be turned on in Java (-parameters command line option to javac).
  2. The class is annotated with @CordaSerializable.
  3. The declared types of constructor arguments, getters, and setters must be supported, and where generics are used the generic parameter must be a supported type, an open wildcard (*), or a bounded wildcard which is currently widened to an open wildcard.
  4. Any superclass must adhere to the same rules, but can be abstract.
  5. Object graph cycles are not supported, so an object cannot refer to itself, directly or indirectly.

Constructor Instantiation

The primary way the AMQP serialization framework for Corda instantiates objects is via a defined constructor. This is used to first determine which properties of an object are to be serialised then, on deserialization, it is used to instantiate the object with the serialized values.

This is the recommended design idiom for serializable objects in Corda as it allows for immutable state objects to be created

  1. A Java Bean getter for each of the properties in the constructor, with the names matching up. For example, for a constructor parameter foo, there must be a getter called getFoo(). If the type of foo is boolean, the getter may optionally be called isFoo(). This is why the class must be compiled with parameter names turned on.
  2. A constructor which takes all of the properties that you wish to record in the serialized form. This is required in order for the serialization framework to reconstruct an instance of your class.
  3. If more than one constructor is provided, the serialization framework needs to know which one to use. The @ConstructorForDeserialization annotation can be used to indicate which one. For a Kotlin class, without the @ConstructorForDeserialization annotation, the primary constructor will be selected.

In Kotlin, this maps cleanly to a data class where there getters are synthesized automatically. For example,

data class Example (val a: Int, val b: String)

Both properties a and b will be included in the serialised form. However, as stated above, properties not mentioned in the constructor will not be serialised. For example, in the following code property c will not be considered part of the serialised form

data class Example (val a: Int, val b: String) {
    var c: Int = 20
}

var e = Example (10, "hello")
e.c = 100;

val e2 = e.serialize().deserialize() // e2.c will be 20, not 100!!!

Setter Instantiation

As an alternative to constructor based initialisation Corda can also determine the important elements of an object by inspecting the getter and setter methods present on a class. If a class has only a default constructor and properties then the serializable properties will be determined by the presence of both a getter and setter for that property that are both publicly visible. I.e. the class adheres to the classic idiom of mutable JavaBeans.

On deserialization, a default instance will first be created and then, in turn, the setters invoked on that object to populate the correct values.

For example:

class Example {
    private int a;
    private int b;
    private int c;

    public int getA() { return a; }
    public int getB() { return b; }
    public int getC() { return c; }

    public void setA(int a) { this.a = a; }
    public void setB(int b) { this.b = b; }
    public void setC(int c) { this.c = c; }
}

Inaccessible Private Properties

Whilst the Corda AMQP serialization framework supports private object properties without publicly accessible getter methods this development idiom is strongly discouraged.

For example.

Kotlin:

data class C(val a: Int, private val b: Int)

Java:

class C {
    public Integer a;
    private Integer b;

    C(Integer a, Integer b) {
        this.a = a;
        this.b = b;
    }
}

When designing stateful objects is should be remembered that they are not, despite appearances, traditional programmatic constructs. They are signed over, transformed, serialised, and relationally mapped. As such, all elements should be publicly accessible by design

Warning

IDEs will indiciate erroneously that properties can be given something other than public visibility. Ignore this as whilst it will work, as discussed above there are many reasons why this isn't a good idea and those are beyond the scope of the IDEs inference rules

Providing a public getter, as per the following example, is acceptable

Kotlin:

data class C(val a: Int, private val b: Int) {
    public fun getB() = b
}

Java:

class C {
    public Integer a;
    private Integer b;

    C(Integer a, Integer b) {
        this.a = a;
        this.b = b;
    }

    public Integer getB() {
        return b;
    }
}

Enums

  1. All enums are supported, provided they are annotated with @CordaSerializable.

Exceptions

The following rules apply to supported Throwable implementations.

  1. If you wish for your exception to be serializable and transported type safely it should inherit from either CordaException or CordaRuntimeException.
  2. If not, the Throwable will deserialize to a CordaRuntimeException with the details of the original Throwable contained within it, including the class name of the original Throwable.

Kotlin Objects

  1. Kotlin object s are singletons and treated differently. They are recorded into the stream with no properties and deserialize back to the singleton instance. Currently, the same is not true of Java singletons, and they will deserialize to new instances of the class.
  2. Kotlin's anonymous object s are not currently supported. I.e. constructs like: object : Contract {...} will not serialize correctly and need to be re-written as an explicit class declaration.

The Carpenter

We will support a class carpenter that can dynamically manufacture classes from the supplied schema when deserializing in the JVM without the supporting classes on the classpath. This can be useful where other components might expect to be able to use reflection over the deserialized data, and also for ensuring classes not on the classpath can be deserialized without loading potentially malicious code dynamically without security review outside of a fully sandboxed environment. A more detailed discussion of the carpenter will be provided in a future update to the documentation.

Future Enhancements

  1. Java singleton support. We will add support for identifying classes which are singletons and identifying the static method responsible for returning the singleton instance.
  2. Instance internalizing support. We will add support for identifying classes that should be resolved against an instances map to avoid creating many duplicate instances that are equal. Similar to String.intern().

Type Evolution

Type evolution is the mechanisms by which classes can be altered over time yet still remain serializable and deserializable across all versions of the class. This ensures an object serialized with an older idea of what the class "looked like" can be deserialized and a version of the current state of the class instantiated.

More detail can be found in serialization-default-evolution

Enum Evolution

Corda supports interoperability of enumerated type versions. This allows such types to be changed over time without breaking backward (or forward) compatibility. The rules and mechanisms for doing this are discussed in serialization-enum-evolution`