* Expand the deterministic JDK image to make it friendlier to IntelliJ. * Fix Gradle always to use the latest deterministic rt.jar available. * Write JDK items directly from Gradle.
14 KiB
Deterministic Corda Modules
A Corda contract's verify function should always produce the same results for the same input data. To that end, Corda provides the following modules:
core-deterministic
serialization-deterministic
jdk8u-deterministic
These are reduced version of Corda's core
and serialization
modules and the OpenJDK 8 rt.jar
, where the non-deterministic functionality has been removed. The intention here is that all CorDapp classes required for contract verification should be compiled against these modules to prevent them containing non-deterministic behaviour.
Note
These modules are only a development aid. They cannot guarantee determinism without also including deterministic versions of all their dependent libraries, e.g. kotlin-stdlib
.
Generating the Deterministic Modules
- JDK 8
jdk8u-deterministic
is a "pseudo JDK" image that we can point the Java and Kotlin compilers to. It downloads thert.jar
containing a deterministic subset of the Java 8 APIs from the Artifactory.To build a new version of this JAR and upload it to the Artifactory, see the
create-jdk8u
module. This is a standalone Gradle project within the Corda repository that will clone thedeterministic-jvm8
branch of Corda's OpenJDK repository and then build it. (This currently requires a C++ compiler, GNU Make and a UNIX-like development environment.)- Corda Modules
core-deterministic
andserialization-deterministic
are generated from Corda'score
andserialization
modules respectively using both ProGuard and Corda'sJarFilter
Gradle plugin. Corda developers configure these tools by applying Corda's@KeepForDJVM
and@DeleteForDJVM
annotations to elements ofcore
andserialization
as describedhere <deterministic_annotations>
.
The build generates each of Corda's deterministic JARs in six steps:
Some very few classes in the original JAR must be replaced completely. This is typically because the original class uses something like
ThreadLocal
, which is not available in the deterministic Java APIs, and yet the class is still required by the deterministic JAR. We must keep such classes to a minimum!The patched JAR is analysed by ProGuard for the first time using the following rule:
keep '@interface net.corda.core.KeepForDJVM { *; }'
ProGuard works by calculating how much code is reachable from given "entry points", and in our case these entry points are the
@KeepForDJVM
classes. The unreachable classes are then discarded by ProGuard'sshrink
option.The remaining classes may still contain non-deterministic code. However, there is no way of writing a ProGuard rule explicitly to discard anything. Consider the following class:
@CordaSerializable @KeepForDJVM data class UniqueIdentifier(val externalId: String?, val id: UUID) : Comparable<UniqueIdentifier> { @DeleteForDJVM constructor(externalId: String?) : this(externalId, UUID.randomUUID()) @DeleteForDJVM constructor() : this(null) ... }
While CorDapps will definitely need to handle
UniqueIdentifier
objects, both of the secondary constructors generate a new randomUUID
and so are non-deterministic. Hence the next "determinising" step is to pass the classes to theJarFilter
tool, which strips out all of the elements which have been annotated as@DeleteForDJVM
and stubs out any functions annotated with@StubOutForDJVM
. (Stub functions that return a value will throwUnsupportedOperationException
, whereasvoid
orUnit
stubs will do nothing.)After the
@DeleteForDJVM
elements have been filtered out, the classes are rescanned using ProGuard to remove any more code that has now become unreachable.The remaining classes define our deterministic subset. However, the
@kotlin.Metadata
annotations on the compiled Kotlin classes still contain references to all of the functions and properties that ProGuard has deleted. Therefore we now use theJarFilter
to delete these references, as otherwise the Kotlin compiler will pretend that the deleted functions and properties are still present.Finally, we use ProGuard again to validate our JAR against the deterministic
rt.jar
:../../core-deterministic/build.gradle
This step will fail if ProGuard spots any Java API references that still cannot be satisfied by the deterministic
rt.jar
, and hence it will break the build.
Configuring IntelliJ with a Deterministic SDK
We would like to configure IntelliJ so that it will highlight uses of non-deterministic Java APIs as not found. Or, more specifically, we would like IntelliJ to use the deterministic-rt.jar
as a "Module SDK" for deterministic modules rather than the rt.jar
from the default project SDK, to make IntelliJ consistent with Gradle.
This is possible, but slightly tricky to configure because IntelliJ will not recognise an SDK containing only the deterministic-rt.jar
as being valid. It also requires that IntelliJ delegate all build tasks to Gradle, and that Gradle be configured to use the Project's SDK.
- Creating the Deterministic SDK
Gradle creates a suitable JDK image in the project's
jdk8u-deterministic/jdk
directory, and you can configure IntelliJ to use this location for this SDK. However, you should also be aware that IntelliJ SDKs are available for all projects to use.To create this JDK image, execute the following:
gradlew jdk8u-deterministic:copyJdk $
Now select
File/Project Structure/Platform Settings/SDKs
and add a new JDK SDK with thejdk8u-deterministic/jdk
directory as its home. Rename this SDK to something like "1.8 (Deterministic)".This should be sufficient for IntelliJ. However, if IntelliJ realises that this SDK does not contain a full JDK then you will need to configure the new SDK by hand:
Create a JDK Home directory with the following contents:
jre/lib/rt.jar
where
rt.jar
here is this renamed artifact:<dependency> <groupId>net.corda</groupId> <artifactId>deterministic-rt</artifactId> <classifier>api</classifier> </dependency>
While IntelliJ is not running, locate the
config/options/jdk.table.xml
file in IntelliJ's configuration directory. Add an empty<jdk>
section to this file:<jdk version="2"> <name value="1.8 (Deterministic)"/> <type value="JavaSDK"/> <version value="java version "1.8.0""/> <homePath value=".. path to the deterministic JDK directory .."/> <roots> </roots> </jdk>
Open IntelliJ and select
File/Project Structure/Platform Settings/SDKs
. The "1.8 (Deterministic)" SDK should now be present. Select it and then click on theClasspath
tab. Press the "Add" / "Plus" button to addrt.jar
to the SDK's classpath. Then select theAnnotations
tab and include the same JAR(s) as the other SDKs.
- Configuring the Corda Project
Open the root
build.gradle
file and define this property:buildscript { ext { ... deterministic_idea_sdk = '1.8 (Deterministic)' ... } }
- Configuring IntelliJ
Go to
File/Settings/Build, Execution, Deployment/Build Tools/Gradle
, and configure Gradle's JVM to be the project's JVM.Go to
File/Settings/Build, Execution, Deployment/Build Tools/Gradle/Runner
, and select these options:- Delegate IDE build/run action to Gradle
- Run tests using the Gradle Test Runner
Delete all of the
out
directories that IntelliJ has previously generated for each module.Go to
View/Tool Windows/Gradle
and click theRefresh all Gradle projects
button.
These steps will enable IntelliJ's presentation compiler to use the deterministic rt.jar
with the following modules:
core-deterministic
serialization-deterministic
core-deterministic:testing:common
but still build everything using Gradle with the full JDK.
Testing the Deterministic Modules
The core-deterministic:testing
module executes some basic JUnit tests for the core-deterministic
and serialization-deterministic
JARs. These tests are compiled against the deterministic rt.jar
, although they are still executed using the full JDK.
The testing
module also has two sub-modules:
core-deterministic:testing:data
This module generates test data such as serialised transactions and elliptic curve key pairs using the full non-deterministic
core
library and JDK. This data is all written into a single JAR which thetesting
module adds to its classpath.core-deterministic:testing:common
This module provides the test classes which the
testing
anddata
modules need to share. It is therefore compiled against the deterministic API subset.
Applying @KeepForDJVM and @DeleteForDJVM annotations
Corda developers need to understand how to annotate classes in the core
and serialization
modules correctly in order to maintain the deterministic JARs.
Note
Every Kotlin class still has its own .class
file, even when all of those classes share the same source file. Also, annotating the file:
@file:KeepForDJVM
package net.corda.core.internal
does not automatically annotate any class declared within this file. It merely annotates any accompanying Kotlin xxxKt
class.
For more information about how JarFilter
is processing the byte-code inside core
and serialization
, use Gradle's --info
or --debug
command-line options.
- Deterministic Classes
Classes that must be included in the deterministic JAR should be annotated as
@KeepForDJVM
.../../core/src/main/kotlin/net/corda/core/KeepForDJVM.kt
To preserve any Kotlin functions, properties or type aliases that have been declared outside of a
class
, you should annotate the source file'spackage
declaration instead:@file:JvmName("InternalUtils") @file:KeepForDJVM package net.corda.core.internal infix fun Temporal.until(endExclusive: Temporal): Duration = Duration.between(this, endExclusive)
- Non-Deterministic Elements
Elements that must be deleted from classes in the deterministic JAR should be annotated as
@DeleteForDJVM
.../../core/src/main/kotlin/net/corda/core/DeleteForDJVM.kt
You must also ensure that a deterministic class's primary constructor does not reference any classes that are not available in the deterministic
rt.jar
, nor have any non-deterministic default parameter values such asUUID.randomUUID()
. The biggest risk here would be thatJarFilter
would delete the primary constructor and that the class could no longer be instantiated, althoughJarFilter
will print a warning in this case. However, it is also likely that the "determinised" class would have a different serialisation signature than its non-deterministic version and so become unserialisable on the deterministic JVM.Be aware that package-scoped Kotlin properties are all initialised within a common
<clinit>
block inside their host.class
file. This means that whenJarFilter
deletes these properties, it cannot also remove their initialisation code. For example:package net.corda.core @DeleteForDJVM val map: MutableMap<String, String> = ConcurrentHashMap()
In this case,
JarFilter
would delete themap
property but the<clinit>
block would still create an instance ofConcurrentHashMap
. The solution here is to refactor the property into its own file and then annotate the file itself as@DeleteForDJVM
instead.- Non-Deterministic Function Stubs
Sometimes it is impossible to delete a function entirely. Or a function may have some non-deterministic code embedded inside it that cannot be removed. For these rare cases, there is the
@StubOutForDJVM
annotation:../../core/src/main/kotlin/net/corda/core/StubOutForDJVM.kt
This annotation instructs
JarFilter
to replace the function's body with either an empty body (for functions that returnvoid
orUnit
) or one that throwsUnsupportedOperationException
. For example:fun necessaryCode() { nonDeterministicOperations() otherOperations() } @StubOutForDJVM private fun nonDeterministicOperations() { // etc }