In Corda 4, FinalityFlow was updated to become an initiated flow, in order to ensure a node does not have to accept any signed transaction it receives without being able to check it first. The old behaviour of FinalityFlow was gated behind a targetPlatformVersion check, to prevent apps targeting V4 from using the old behaviour. This is problematic for a few reasons. For an app wishing to be backwards compatible with a version running on V3, this forces the app to set targetPlatformVersion = 3, even if the app is thoroughly tested against V4. This goes against the purpose of the targetPlatformVersion. Another consequence is that an app remains pinned to targetPlatformVersion = 3 until it is sure that there are no other apps running at a lower version in the network, which would prevent newer versions of the app from taking advantage of features gated behind targetPlatformVersion checks. (Note that the restriction only prevents a new version of the app from initiating FinalityFlow with the old version - the old version is able to initiate a FinalityFlow and the new version will handle it, assuming the app has been written correctly.) This fix removes the targetPlatformVersion check from FinalityFlow, and also provides a few documentation updates to clarify what level of testing would be expected to set a targetPlatformVersion.
6.3 KiB
Versioning
As the Corda platform evolves and new features are added it becomes important to have a versioning system which allows its users to easily compare versions and know what feature are available to them. Each Corda release uses the standard semantic versioning scheme of major.minor
. This is useful when making releases in the public domain but is not friendly for a developer working on the platform. It first has to be parsed and then they have three separate segments on which to determine API differences. The release version is still useful and every MQ message the node sends attaches it to the release-version
header property for debugging purposes.
Platform version
It is much easier to use a single incrementing integer value to represent the API version of the Corda platform, which is called the platform version. It is similar to Android's API Level. It starts at 1 and will increment by exactly 1 for each release which changes any of the publicly exposed APIs in the entire platform. This includes public APIs on the node itself, the RPC system, messaging, serialisation, etc. API backwards compatibility will always be maintained, with the use of deprecation to suggest migration away from old APIs. In very rare situations APIs may have to be changed, for example due to security issues. There is no relationship between the platform version and the release version - a change in the major or minor values may or may not increase the platform version. However we do endeavour to keep them synchronised for now, as a convenience.
The platform version is part of the node's NodeInfo
object, which is available from the ServiceHub
. This enables a CorDapp to find out which version it's running on and determine whether a desired feature is available. When a node registers with the network map it will check its own version against the minimum version requirement for the network.
Minimum platform version
Applications can advertise a minimum platform version they require. If your app uses new APIs that were added in (for example) Corda 5, you should specify a minimum version of 5. This will ensure the app won't be loaded by older nodes. If you can optionally use the new APIs, you can keep the minimum set to a lower number. Attempting to use new APIs on older nodes can cause NoSuchMethodError
exceptions and similar problems, so you'd want to check the node version using ServiceHub.myInfo
.
Target version
Applications can also advertise a target version. This is similar to the concept of the same name in Android and iOS. Apps should advertise the highest version of the platform they have been tested against. This allows the node to activate or deactivate backwards compatibility codepaths depending on whether they're necessary or not, as workarounds for apps designed for earlier versions.
For example, consider an app that uses new features introduced in Corda 4, but which has passed regression testing on Corda 5. It will advertise a minimum platform version of 4 and a target version of 5. These numbers are published in the JAR manifest file.
If this app is loaded into a Corda 6 node, that node may implement backwards compatibility workarounds for your app that make it slower, less secure, or less featureful. You can opt-in to getting the full benefits of the upgrade by changing your target version to 6. By doing this, you promise that you understood all the changes in Corda 6 and have thoroughly tested your app to prove it works. This testing should include ensuring that the app exhibits the correct behaviour on a node running at the new target version, and that the app functions correctly in a network of nodes running at the same target version.
Target versioning is one of the mechanisms we have to keep the platform evolving and improving, without being permanently constrained to being bug-for-bug compatible with old versions. When no apps are loaded that target old versions, any emulations of older bugs or problems can be disabled.
Publishing versions in your JAR manifests
A well structured CorDapp should be split into two separate modules:
- A contracts jar, that contains your states and contract logic.
- A workflows jar, that contains your flows, services and other support libraries.
The reason for this split is that the contract JAR will be attached to transactions and sent around the network, because this code is what defines the data structures and smart contract logic all nodes will validate. If the rest of your app is a part of that same JAR, it'll get sent around the network too even though it's not needed and will never be used. By splitting your app into a contracts JAR and a workflows JAR that depends on the contracts JAR, this problem is avoided.
In the build.gradle
file for your contract module, add a block like this:
cordapp {
targetPlatformVersion 5
minimumPlatformVersion 4
contract {
name "MegaApp Contracts"
vendor "MegaCorp"
licence "MegaLicence"
versionId 1
}
}
This will put the necessary entries into your JAR manifest to set both platform version numbers. If they aren't specified, both default to 1. Your app can itself has a version number, which should always increment and must also always be an integer.
And in the build.gradle
file for your workflows jar, add a block like this:
cordapp {
targetPlatformVersion 5
minimumPlatformVersion 4
workflow {
name "MegaApp"
vendor "MegaCorp"
licence "MegaLicence"
versionId 1
}
}
It's entirely expected and reasonable to have an open source contracts module and a proprietary workflow module - the latter may contain sophisticated or proprietary business logic, machine learning models, even user interface code. There's nothing that restricts it to just being Corda flows or services.
Important
The versionId
specified for the JAR manifest is checked by the platform and is used for informative purposes only. See "contract_downgrade_rule_ref
" for more information.
Note
You can read the original design doc here: design/targetversion/design
.