This is an attempt to reproduce an issue reported on the discussion
group. However, the current form of the test is passing, so further
work will be necessary to trigger the bug.
As reported on the discussion group, there is a problem with the
ClassLoader.defineClass implementation sunch that this test is not
currently passing, at least for the mode=debug and bootimage=true
builds. I plan to address these failures soon, but I wanted to add a
test first to make sure I could reproduce them.
There is a delay between when we tell the OS to start a thread and
when it actually starts, and during that time a thread might
mistakenly think it was the last to exit, try to shut down the VM, and
then block in joinAll when it finds it wasn't the last one after all.
The solution is to increment Machine::liveCount and add the new thread
to the process tree before starting it -- all while holding
Machine::stateLock for atomicity. This helps guarantee that when
liveCount is one, we can be sure there's really only one thread
running or staged to run.
If we don't do this, the VM will crash when it tries to create a stack
trace for the error because makeObjectArray will return null
immediately when it sees there is a pending exception.
GCC 4.5.1 and later use a naming convention where functions are not
prefixed with an underscore, whereas previous versions added the
underscore. This change was made to ensure compatibility with
Microsoft's compiler. Since GCC 4.5.0 has a serious code generation
bug, we now only support later versions, so it makes sense to assume
the newer convention.
There was an unlikely but dangerous race condition in monitorRelease
such that when a thread released a monitor and then tried to notify
the next thread in line, the latter thread might exit before it can be
notified. This potentially led to a crash as the former thread tried
to acquire and notify the latter thread's private lock after it had
been disposed.
The solution is to do as we do in the interrupt and join cases: call
acquireSystem first and thereby either block the target thread from
exiting until we're done or find that it has already exited, in which
case nothing needs to be done.
I also looked at monitorNotify to see if we have a similar bug there,
but in that case the target thread can't exit without first acquiring
and releasing the monitor, and since we ensure that no thread can
execute monitorNotify without holding the monitor, there's no
potential for a race.
In makeCodeImage, we were passing zero to Promise::Listener::resolve,
which would lead to an assertion error if the address of the code
image was further from the base of the address space (i.e. zero) than
could be spanned by a jump on the target architecture. Since, in this
context, we immediately overwrite the value stored, we may pass
whatever we want to this function (we're only calling it so we can
retrieve the location of the value in the image), and the code image
pointer is a better choice for the above reason.
When trying to create an array class, we try to resolve
java.lang.Object so we can use its vtable in the array class.
However, if Object is missing, we'll try to create and throw a
ClassNotFoundException, which requires creating an array to store the
stack trace, which requires creating an array class, which requires
resolving Object, etc.. This commit short-circuits this process by
telling resolveClass not to create and throw an exception if it can't
find Object.
While doing the above work, I noticed that the implementations of
Classpath::makeThrowable in classpath-avian.cpp and
classpath-openjdk.cpp were identical, so I made makeThrowable a
top-level function.
Finally, I discovered that Thread.setDaemon can only be called before
the target thread has been started, which allowed me to simplify the
code to track daemon threads in the VM.
We have to be careful about how we calculate return addresses on ARM
due to padding introduced by constant pools interspersed with code.
When calculating the offset of code where we're inserting a constant
pool, we want the offset of the end of the pool for jump targets, but
we want the offset just prior to the beginning of the pool (i.e. the
offset of the instruction responsible for jumping past the pool) when
calculating a return address.
The code added to runJavaThread was unecessary and harmful since it
allowed the global daemon thread count to become permanently
out-of-sync with the actual number of daemon threads.
This mainly involves some makefile ugliness to work around bugs in the
native Windows OpenJDK code involving conflicting static and
not-static declarations which GCC 4.0 and later justifiably reject but
MSVC tolerates.
