They're prone to cause flaky tests due to the "allocated" ports already being taken by the system when eventually needed. Replaced usages with PortAllocation.Incremental.
Affected unit tests made into integration tests to avoid any issues in the future when unit tests are made to run in parallel.
* CORDA-1715 Ordering the X500 name for the CRL extension of the TLS certificate
* Addressing review comments
* Addressing review comments - round 2
* Throwing an exception on incorrect TLS CRL issuer configuration
* Changes after the redesign decisions
* Small refactoring
* ENT-2014 Deletes of NodeInfo can fail to propagate leading to infinite retries
ENT-1880 Move identity key generation to network registration process
(cherry picked from commit c3ac203)
* CORDA-1645: Checkpoint before calling an idempotent sub-flow.
When an idempotent sub-flow causes a flow restart, the flow will be
replayed from the last checkpoint before the sub-flow invocation.
However, the logic between the last checkpoint and the sub-flow invocation
may contain side-effects which shouldn't be replayed. Thus we need to persist
a checkpoint just before an idempotent sub-flow is invoked.
As reported in [CORDA-1609](https://r3-cev.atlassian.net/browse/CORDA-1609),
`CordaRPCClientConfiguration.default` is not accessible from Java since
`default` is a reserved keyword.
As part of the refactor made in #2831, `CordaRPCClientConfiguration` went
from being a data class to an interface with a backing implementation of
type `CordaRPCClientConfigurationImpl`.
This resulted in Java users having to rewrite code that was on the form:
```java
final CordaRPCClient client = new CordaRPCClient(
nodeAddress, CordaRPCClientConfiguration.DEFAULT
);
```
to something like this:
```java
final CordaRPCClient client = new CordaRPCClient(
nodeAddress, CordaRPCClientConfiguration.Companion.default()
);
```
However, this does not work. The user would get a compilation error because
`default` is a reserved keyword in Java.
Since `CordaRPCClientConfiguration` has been made an interface, there is no
easy way of introducing a static final field on the interface from Kotlin.
Consequently, I've changed this back to using a `class` with a static field
named `DEFAULT` instead of the static method `default()`.
It should be noted that `default()` / `DEFAULT` is currently only used
internally to pass in default values in `CordaRPCClient.kt` and
`CordaRPCClientUtils.kt`. That said, it is exposed as part of our API
surface and consequently shouldn't be broken.
The latter means that in the above example, the user would actually not
have to provide the parameter at all:
```java
final CordaRPCClient client = new CordaRPCClient(nodeAddress);
```
As can be seen from the definition of `CordaRPCClient`:
```kotlin
class CordaRPCClient private constructor(...) {
@JvmOverloads
constructor(
hostAndPort: NetworkHostAndPort,
configuration: CordaRPCClientConfiguration = CordaRPCClientConfiguration.DEFAULT
) : this(hostAndPort, configuration, null)
```
The mentioned [refactor](7a077e76f0 (diff-0948c125db93a22263eb81eaf3161c17R65))
did not make it into the 3.1 release, so from an API-stability perspective,
this change can be applied without affecting our commitment to a
backwards compatible API..
