getting close to code complete
Needs spelling / grammar / flow review and a top to bottom reading through.
This commit is contained in:
		| @@ -313,21 +313,51 @@ KNEL will provide franchisees use of the KNEL systems as a control/support plane | |||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| ## Responsibilities and context for {{PARTY2}} | ## Responsibilities and context for {{PARTY2}} | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| - {{PARTY2}} retains all financial control (bank accounts/third party payment processors) | - {{PARTY2}} will retain all financial control (bank accounts/third party payment processors) of the business.  | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| - {{PARTY2}} will have total control over ThePeerNet/TeamRental/YourDreamNameHere/MerchantsOfHope. They can be closed/opensource, whatever you want. | - {{PARTY2}} will have total control over the: | ||||||
|  | - Business Plan | ||||||
|  | - Funding / Fundraising  | ||||||
|  | - Website  | ||||||
|  | - Application  | ||||||
|  | - Customers | ||||||
|  | - Partners | ||||||
|  | - Vendors (as long as they don’t provide a service provided by KNEL) (or a negotiated exception is granted) | ||||||
|  | - Employees | ||||||
|  | - Contractors  | ||||||
|  | - Licensing of code  | ||||||
|  | - Terms of service  | ||||||
|  | - Pricing | ||||||
|  | - Executive team  | ||||||
|  | - Series LLC members  | ||||||
|  | - Series LLC operating agreement (other than non override parts from the Turnkey Network Systems LLC operating agreement) | ||||||
|  | - TSYS Group board committee for the series  | ||||||
|  | - etc   | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| - you want to be a leader, be in the driver seat, put your brand/stamp on everything | for the following businesses:     | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| - you have a deep network of personnel/talent , a deep contact network etc | - TeamRental | ||||||
|  | - RackRental.net (non Richelle franchises) (close consultation / collaboration / code availability on any development done on the RackRental.net micro services)  | ||||||
|  | - STL (non Richelle franchises) close consultation / collaboration / code availability on any development done on the STL micro services) | ||||||
|  | - YourDreamNameHere | ||||||
|  | - MerchantsOfHope | ||||||
|  | - Redwood Springs Capital Partners (excluding the TopHat Fund) (and any/all other funds that may emerge in the future related to fundraising for Suborbital Systems , HFNOC, HFNFC). | ||||||
|  | - Ap4ap.org  | ||||||
|  | - sol-calc.com micro service (it will remain under its custom license)  | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| - {{PARTY1}} has no real interest in these “ancillary businesses” but would like to retain a minority silent stake. |  | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| - The only thing I ask, is that TSYS Group/Redwood Group and the Non Profits get use of the stack forever at 0 charge (we would pay any actual costs like domain registration of course). (I have an on-premise computer room that will handle all of the heavy compute/storage for all of those companies, so we wouldn’t eat into your margins). | - {{PARTY2}} wants to be a leader, be in the driver seat, put their brand/stamp on everything.  | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
|  | - {{PARTY2}} has a deep network of personnel/talent , a deep contact network etc to increase the likelihood of success.  | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
|  | - {{PARTY2}} understands that {{PARTY1}} has no real interest in these ancillary businesses but would like to retain a minority silent stake in exchange for providing the following contributions:  | ||||||
|  |   | ||||||
|  | - brand | ||||||
|  | - KNEL back office | ||||||
|  | - this contract | ||||||
|  | - StartupStarterPackage | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| - RackRental is pretty core to suborbital, so I would retain development control over it. It’s closed source and would remain so. It has some hefty middleware and backend bits (three racks of gear). Also I have GPU cluster and that needs to remain ITAR controlled. I just don’t want to deal with marketing/sales/go-to-market. |  | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| - StartingLineProductions is pretty integral to Suborbital in terms of us using it to manage our R&D overhead. Open to discuss specifics of how that would work. Maybe some kind of multi tenant setup and we have full control of our tenant? |  | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
| ## Shared Responsibilities and context for {{PARTY1}} and {{PARTY2}} | ## Shared Responsibilities and context for {{PARTY1}} and {{PARTY2}} | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
|   | |||||||
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user