First commit

templates/Review-Meeting-Notes.md

@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+<!-- markdownlint-disable-next-line first-line-h1 -->
+
+##### Project
+
+::[PROJECT-NAME](Home)
+
+##### Release Number
+
+::X.Y.Z
+
+##### Location of Meeting
+
+::LOCATION, BUILDING, ROOM
+
+##### Date and Time of Meeting
+
+::YEAR/MONTH/DAY HH:MM
+
+##### Attendees
+
+- ::PERSON-NAME
+- ::PERSON-NAME
+- ::PERSON-NAME
+- ::PERSON-NAME
+
+##### Related Documents
+
+- [QA Plan](QA-Plan) > Review Meeting Notes
+- [Review Meeting Checklists](Review-Meeting-Checklists)
+
+---
+
+### Documents and Code Reviewed at this Meeting
+
+- ::[Feature list section of requirements](#tbd)
+- ::[Multi-user section of requirements](#tbd)
+- ::[Hello.java](/source/browse/PROJECT-NAME/src/Hello.java)
+- ::[HelloStream.java](/source/browse/PROJECT-NAME/src/HelloStream.java)
+- ::[HelloPanel.java](/source/browse/PROJECT-NAME/src/HelloPanel.java)
+
+### Meeting Minutes
+
+_TODO: Fill in the information above and write a brief summary of what
+happened at the meeting. The text below is just a sample._
+
+::We started on time with 3 members and the other team members arrived
+shortly thereafter.
+
+::In the first hour of the review meeting, we went over issues that the
+team had entered individually. Most of the issues raised questions about
+the error handling capability of Hello.java, but there were also issues
+about multi-user robustness requirements and UI.
+
+::In the second hour, we read through all of the methods of
+HelloStream.java. All team members agreed that they understood each
+method and thought is was correct before we moved on to the next method.
+We raised issues of consistency between the constructors in that class
+and other classes. The checklist was helpful in identifying the fact
+that we needed to implement hash() and equals(). All raised issues were
+entered into the issue tracker and marked with the word "review".
+
+::Although, some issues were found, we do not feel that Hello.java and
+HelloStream.java need to be inspected again. HelloPanel was not
+inspected, it still needs review.
+
+### Action Items
+
+::All defects and tasks identified in this review are being tracked in the
+issue tracker.