# TSYSDevStack SupportStack Demo Builder ## Objective Create an out-of-the-box, localhost-bound only, ephemeral Docker volume-only demonstration version of the SupportStack components documented in the VendorList-SupportStack.md file. ## MVP Test Run Objective Create a proof of concept with docker-socket-proxy, homepage, and wakaapi components that demonstrate proper homepage integration via Docker Compose labels. This MVP will serve as a validation of the full approach before proceeding with the complete stack implementation. ## Architecture Requirements - All Docker artifacts must be prefixed with `TSYSDevStack-SupportStack-Demo` - Run exclusively on localhost (localhost binding only) - Ephemeral volumes only (no persistent storage) - Resource limits set for single-user demo capacity - No external network access (localhost bound only) - Components: docker-socket-proxy, portainer, homepage as foundational elements - All artifacts must go into artifacts/SupportStack directory to keep the directory well organized and avoid cluttering the root directory ## Development Methodology - Strict Test Driven Development (TDD) process - Write test → Execute test → Test fails → Write minimal code to pass test - 75%+ code coverage requirement - 100% test pass requirement - Component-by-component development approach - Complete one component before moving to the next ## MVP Component Development Sequence (Test Run) 1. **MVP**: docker-socket-proxy, homepage, wakaapi (each must fully satisfy Definition of Done before proceeding) - docker-socket-proxy: Enable Docker socket access for homepage integration - homepage: Configure to access Docker socket and discover labeled containers - wakaapi: Integrate with homepage using proper labels - All services must utilize Docker Compose labels to automatically show up in homepage - Implement proper service discovery for homepage integration using gethomepage labels - Ensure all components are properly labeled with homepage integration labels - Implement proper startup ordering using depends_on with health checks ## Component Completion Validation - Each component must pass health checks for 5 consecutive minutes before moving to the next - All tests must pass with 100% success rate before moving to the next component - Resource utilization must be within specified limits before moving to the next component - Integration tests with previously completed components must pass before moving forward - Homepage must automatically detect and display all services with proper labels - Specific validation checkpoints after each service deployment: - docker-socket-proxy: Validate Docker socket access and network connectivity to Docker daemon - homepage: Validate homepage starts and can connect to Docker socket proxy, verify UI is accessible - wakaapi: Validate service starts and can be integrated into homepage with proper labels - Each service must be validated in homepage dashboard after integration - Update STATUS.md with validation results for each component ## Technical Specifications - No Bitnami images allowed - Use official or trusted repository images only: - docker-socket-proxy: tecnativa/docker-socket-proxy (pinned version tag) - homepage: gethomepage/homepage (pinned version tag) - wakaapi: ghcr.io/ekkinox/wakaapi (pinned version tag) - Implement Docker Compose orchestration - Use Docker named volumes for ephemeral storage - Implement proper resource limits in docker-compose.yml: CPU: 0.5-1.0 cores per service, Memory: 128MB-512MB per service (variable based on service type), Disk: 1GB per service for ephemeral volumes - Implement comprehensive health checks for all services with appropriate intervals and timeouts - Implement proper networking (internal only) - All ports bound to localhost (127.0.0.1) with specific port assignments: - docker-socket-proxy: Internal network only, no external ports exposed - homepage: Port 3000 (localhost only) - configurable via environment variable - wakaapi: Port 3001 (localhost only) - configurable via environment variable - All environment variables must be pre-set in TSYSDevStack-SupportStack-Demo-Settings file (single settings file for simplicity in demo) - All docker compose files (one per component) should be prefixed with: TSYSDevStack-SupportStack-Demo-DockerCompose- - All docker compose files should use environment variables for everything (variables will be set in TSYSDevStack-SupportStack-Demo-Settings file) - Health checks must validate service readiness before proceeding with dependent components - Health check endpoints must be accessible only from internal network - Health check configurations must be parameterized via environment variables - All services must utilize Docker Compose labels to automatically show up in homepage - Implement proper homepage integration labels for automatic service discovery using gethomepage/homepage labels: - Required: homepage.group, homepage.name, homepage.icon - Optional: homepage.href, homepage.description, homepage.widget.type, homepage.widget.url, homepage.widget.key, homepage.widget.fields, homepage.weight - Homepage integration must include proper naming, icons, and status indicators - Use pinned image tags rather than 'latest' for all container images - Run containers as non-root users where possible - Enable read-only filesystems where appropriate - Implement security scanning during build process (for demo, secrets via environment variables are acceptable) - Define network policies for internal communication only - Use depends_on with health checks to ensure proper startup ordering of services ## Stack Control - All control of the stack should go into a script called TSYSDevStack-SupportStack-Demo-Control.sh - The script should take the following arguments: start/stop/uninstall/update/test - Ensure script is executable and contains error handling ## Component Definition of Done - All health checks pass consistently for each component - docker-socket-proxy: HTTP health check on / (internal only) - homepage: HTTP health check on /api/health (internal only) - wakaapi: HTTP health check on /health (internal only) - Test suite passes with 100% success rate (unit, integration, e2e) - Code coverage of >75% for each component - Resource limits properly implemented and validated (CPU: 0.5-1.0 cores, Memory: 128MB-512MB, Disk: 1GB per service) - All services properly bound to localhost only - Proper error handling and logging implemented (with retry logic and exponential backoff) - Documentation and configuration files created - Component successfully starts, runs, and stops without manual intervention - Component properly integrates with other components without conflicts - Automated self-recovery mechanisms implemented for common failure scenarios - Performance benchmarks met for single-user demo capacity (apply reasonable defaults based on service type) - Security scans completed and passed (run as non-root, read-only filesystems where appropriate) - No hard-coded values; all configuration via environment variables - All dependencies properly specified and resolved using depends_on with health checks - Component properly labeled with homepage integration labels (homepage.group, homepage.name, homepage.icon, etc.) - Container uses pinned image tags rather than 'latest' - Services validate properly in homepage after integration ## Testing Requirements - Unit tests for each component configuration - Integration tests for component interactions - End-to-end tests for the complete stack - Performance tests to validate resource limits - Security tests for localhost binding - Health check tests for all services - Coverage report generation - Continuous test execution during development - Automated test suite execution for each component before moving to the next - End-to-end validation tests after each component integration ## Error Resolution Strategy - Implement autonomous error detection and resolution - Automatic retry mechanisms for transient failures with exponential backoff (base delay of 5s, max 5 attempts) - Fallback configurations for compatibility issues - Comprehensive logging for debugging - Graceful degradation for optional components - Automated rollback for failed deployments - Self-healing mechanisms for common failure scenarios - Automated restart policies with appropriate backoff strategies - Deadlock detection and resolution mechanisms - Resource exhaustion monitoring and mitigation - Automated cleanup of failed component attempts - Persistent state recovery mechanisms - Fail-safe modes for critical components - Circuit breaker patterns for service dependencies - If unable to resolve an issue after multiple attempts, flag it in collab/SupportStack/HUMANHELP.md and move on - Maintain running status reports in collab/SupportStack/STATUS.md - Use git commit heavily to track progress - Push to remote repository whenever a component is fully working/tested/validated ## Autonomous Operation Requirements - Project must be capable of running unattended for 1-2 days without manual intervention - All components must implement self-monitoring and self-healing - Automated monitoring of resource usage with alerts if limits exceeded - All failure scenarios must have automated recovery procedures - Consistent state maintenance across all components - Automated cleanup of temporary resources - Comprehensive logging for troubleshooting without human intervention - Built-in validation checks to ensure continued operation - Automatic restart of failed services with appropriate retry logic - Prevention of resource leaks and proper cleanup on shutdown ## Qwen Optimization - Structured for autonomous execution - Clear task decomposition - Explicit success/failure criteria - Self-contained instructions - Automated validation steps - Progress tracking mechanisms ## Output Deliverables - Directory structure in artifacts/SupportStack - Environment variables file: TSYSDevStack-SupportStack-Demo-Settings - Control script: TSYSDevStack-SupportStack-Demo-Control.sh (with start/stop/uninstall/update/test arguments) - Docker Compose files prefixed with: TSYSDevStack-SupportStack-Demo-DockerCompose- - Component configuration files - Test suite (unit, integration, e2e) - Coverage reports - Execution logs - Documentation files - Health check scripts and configurations - Component readiness and liveness check definitions - Automated validation scripts for component completion - Monitoring and alerting configurations The implementation should work autonomously, handling errors and resolving configuration issues without human intervention while strictly adhering to the TDD process. ## Production Considerations - For production implementation, additional items will be addressed including: - Enhanced monitoring and observability with centralized logging - Advanced security measures (secrets management, network policies, etc.) - Performance benchmarks and optimization - Configuration management with separation of required vs optional parameters - Advanced documentation (architecture diagrams, troubleshooting guides, etc.) - Production-grade error handling and recovery procedures - All deferred items will be tracked in collab/SupportStack/ProdRoadmap.md