mrcharles
ce55409b9a
v10 is the current round. Old rounds preserved in git history and archive/questions/.
2.9 KiB
Questions — v9 (current round)
v8's open items are now settled by the founder's 2026-09-03 chat ruling: OUTBOUND ONLY — all PFV hosts (k8s included) send via the gateway; no inbound ever; no DNAT, no MX cut-over (that scope is dropped from #696). Robustness is a stated requirement (VIP pair, queueing, cluster, monitoring). Map + target architecture updated in place: Discourse t/322.
PMG round — resolved
PQ1 (backend). Cloudron VPS mail.knownelement.com
(152.53.37.179); public MX already points there; fleet delivers
direct today; knel.net zone has no MX (and never needs one now).
PQ2 (inbound path). ✅ N/A by ruling — outbound only. No DNAT, no MX work, ever.
PQ3 (outbound smarthost). All hosts through the gateway VIP.
PQ4 (placement/sizing). Pair already exists: VM 604 tsys6 (192.168.1.11) + VM 711 tsys7 (192.168.1.10), PMG 9.1.0, unclustered.
"Old relay in postfix?" None — relayhost empty fleet-wide.
PMG round — still open (one-line answers fine)
PQ5 (native PMG cluster?). Recommended: yes — config + quarantine replication between .1.11/.1.10, managed strictly serial. OK?
PQ6 (TLS from fleet CA #697?). Recommended: yes for the two admin UIs; SMTP stays opportunistic (all flows are internal + to Cloudron).
PQ7 (notify address). Pair already forwards to coo@turnsys.com.
Confirm for PMG alerts + any held-mail notices?
PQ8 (VIP specifics). Confirm VIP 192.168.3.249 + name
smtp.knel.net + dhcpd host-decl pin (VRRP MAC 00:00:5e:00:01:0a)?
Or name your preferred slot/name.
PQ9 (outbound cutover staging). Recommended: serial staged — PVE hosts + PBS first (verify a week), then VM postfix set. OK?
PQ11 (Cloudron relay user — founder side). Recommended pattern:
PMG authenticates to a dedicated Cloudron mail user (e.g.
pfv-relay@turnsys.com) over :587 submission, so fleet mail exits
with Cloudron's rDNS/reputation. Will you create that user (or point
me at who does)? Fallback if you'd rather not: PMG delivers direct to
recipient MXs (same egress as today, no deliverability gain).
PQ12 (k8s submission port). Recommended: :25 unauthenticated from trusted LAN (pod traffic SNATs to node IPs) as the default; optional :587+auth later if you want app-level credentials. OK as default?
PQ10 (side findings — sub-ticket placement). (a) tsys-ucs-02 root
alias blackholes to systemmail@unassigned-hostname...; (b) Wazuh
alerting never configured (stock example smtp). Ride-alongs in #696
or separate sub-tickets? They get tickets either way — just say where.
Carried from v6 — still open
Q4. Second human approver in gitea? "Planned for very near future"; until then KNEL/access-roster merges are impossible by design. Does not block code/deploy work.
Superseded
v7 PQ wording and v8 PQ10 ordering are superseded by the rulings above; v7/v8 files remain in git history.