Files
PFVCluster/switches/pfv-r3-tor-stor-LACP-FIX.cmds
mrcharles 422999bf3c chore: initialize repo with full project state
Performance optimization engagement for a 7-host Proxmox R&D cluster.
Captures the accumulated work across host tuning, network analysis,
fleet assessment, and kubernetes architecture planning.

Contents:
- Host-side tunings (scripts/): CPU governor, swappiness, BBR, NFS
  nconnect, tuned profiles -- complete on 5 of 7 hosts
- Validation + benchmarking scripts: iperf matrix, bond/NFS fixes
- Collected host data (returned-logs/): check.sh output from all 7
  hosts + iperf results, including newly-validated pfv-tsys9
- AGENTS.md: operating context for AI agents
- PROJECT.md: board-ready fleet assessment with VM placement and
  storage redundancy analysis (40 VMs across 7 hosts)
- K8S.md: kubernetes architecture deep-dive covering cnode/wnode
  distribution, StorageClass design, and ETL/HPC workload planning

💘 Generated with Crush

Assisted-by: Crush:glm-5.2
2026-07-27 11:31:29 -05:00

89 lines
3.8 KiB
Plaintext

!###############################################################################
!# pfv-r3-tor-stor — TARGETED LACP hash verification
!#
!# Purpose: confirm whether `port-channel load-balance layer-2-3-4` actually
!# took effect, and gather the LAG state needed to decide whether the LAG
!# must be bounced.
!#
!# Context: tsys6<->tsys7 is capped at exactly single-link speed (~943 Mbps)
!# with 90K-136K retransmits on multi-stream TCP, but a clean 928 Mbps / 0
!# retransmits on single-stream. That = offered load above 1 Gbps is being
!# dropped at a single egress port. We need to know if the switch hash is
!# really layer-2-3-4, and whether tsys6 + tsys7 ports are correctly
!# bundled into LACP groups.
!#
!# Paste from enable mode. Capture to:
!# returned-logs/pfv-r3-tor-stor-lacp-verify.log
!###############################################################################
enable
terminal datadump
terminal length 0
! --- 1. THE KEY COMMAND: what hash is actually active? -----------------------
! Expected: layer-2-3-4. If it still shows source-mac / dst-mac /
! src-dst-mac (layer 2 only), the change did NOT take effect.
show port-channel load-balance
show port-channel protocol
! --- 2. Which LAGs exist and which physical ports are members ----------------
! Look for the port-channels carrying tsys6 and tsys7. Confirm each has
! TWO member ports both in "bundled" / "Forwarding" state.
show port-channel summary
show port-channel detail
! --- 3. LACP actor/partner state per member port ----------------------------
! Every member port should show: Actor State Flag = AcLg (Active, Aggr),
! Partner Operational, and a non-zero Partner System ID.
show lacp
show lacp neighbor
! --- 4. Per-port counters during/after an iperf run -------------------------
! THIS is the switch-side equivalent of the host RX-counter test.
! Run an 8-stream iperf tsys7->tsys6 first, then immediately capture
! these so the byte counters reflect the test. The TWO tsys6-facing
! ports should show SIMILAR "RX bytes" (switch ingress from tsys6's
! bond is not the test direction; look at TX-out bytes toward tsys6,
! i.e. the ports' output counters). Replace Te1/0/x with the real port
! IDs shown by "show port-channel summary" above:
show interfaces counters
show interfaces counters errors
! --- 5. Running config line that set the hash (proof it was committed) ------
show running-config | include port-channel
! --- 6. Switch identity (to look up correct hash syntax for this model) -----
show version
show system
exit
!###############################################################################
!# DECISION TREE after reading the output:
!#
!# A) show port-channel load-balance reports layer-2-3-4 AND per-port
!# counters show traffic split across BOTH tsys6-facing ports:
!# -> Hash is fine. Re-test iperf; if still ~943 Mbps, the cap is
!# host-side (receiver RX bridge / IRQ / CPU).
!#
!# B) load-balance reports layer-2-3-4 BUT per-port counters show all traffic
!# on ONE tsys6-facing port:
!# -> Hash is configured but the LAG needs a bounce to pick it up.
!# Bounce the relevant port-channel:
!# config
!# interface port-channel N
!# shutdown
!# no shutdown
!# end
!# WARNING: drops all traffic on that LAG for ~2-5 s. Coordinate.
!#
!# C) load-balance still shows a layer-2-only policy:
!# -> The earlier change didn't commit to this context. Re-apply:
!# config
!# port-channel load-balance layer-2-3-4
!# end
!# show port-channel load-balance
!# copy running-config startup-config
!# Then handle as case (B) if counters still aren't split.
!###############################################################################