# Questions — v8 (current round) v7's PMG round is partially resolved — the 2026-09-03 mail audit (55 systems, read-only) answered several questions with ground truth and Charles answered others in chat. Answers recorded below; new questions PQ8–PQ10 need your go. Full map + deploy plan: [Discourse t/322](https://community.turnsys.com/t/322). ## PMG round — resolved **PQ1 (backend).** ✅ Cloudron VPS confirmed as backend: `mail.knownelement.com` (152.53.37.179). Audit adds: public MX already points there; fleet delivers direct today; knel.net zone has no MX. **PQ3 (outbound smarthost).** ✅ Charles ruled: all hosts send through a shared **VIP** in front of the PMG pair. (Mechanics in PQ8 below.) **PQ4 (placement/sizing).** ✅ Resolved by reality: the pair already exists — VM 604 on tsys6 (192.168.1.11) and VM 711 on tsys7 (192.168.1.10), both 2vCPU/4G/32G, running, onboot, PMG 9.1.0 installed, unclustered, default config. Nothing to build; configure only. **"Old relay in postfix?"** ✅ None. `relayhost` is empty on every audited system (16 postfix installs); no ssmtp/msmtp/nullmailer anywhere. Fleet sends direct-to-MX today. ## PMG round — still open **PQ2 (inbound path).** Where does public :25 DNAT land — rrinfra Cisco? Any existing mail port-forwards? (Founder-side; only needed before the MX cut-over, not for outbound value.) **PQ5 (native PMG cluster?).** Recommended: yes — config + quarantine replication between .1.11/.1.10, managed strictly serial. OK? **PQ6 (TLS from fleet CA #697?).** Recommended: yes for the two admin UIs; SMTP stays opportunistic. OK? **PQ7 (notify address).** Evidence says the pair already forwards to `coo@turnsys.com`. Confirm that address for quarantine digests + PMG alerts? **PQ8 (VIP specifics).** Proposal: **VIP 192.168.3.249** (pool ends .3.200; .250-.254 is your infra block), keepalived VRRP VRID 10 on the pair, dhcpd host-declaration pin (VRRP MAC 00:00:5e:00:01:0a), DNS A record `smtp.knel.net` → 192.168.3.249. Confirm the number + name, or name your preferred slot. **PQ9 (outbound cutover staging).** Recommended: serial staged — PVE hosts + PBS first (verify a week), then the VM postfix set, one blue/green hop at a time. OK, or all at once? **PQ10 (side findings — sub-tickets?).** (a) tsys-ucs-02 root alias blackholes to `systemmail@unassigned-hostname...`; (b) Wazuh alerting never configured (stock example smtp). Fix as ride-alongs in #696 or separate sub-tickets? (Will create them either way — just tell me where they land.) ## Carried from v6 — still open **Q4. Second human approver in gitea?** "Planned for very near future"; until then KNEL/access-roster merges are impossible by design. Does not block code/deploy work. ## Carried from v7 — superseded questions PQ1/PQ3/PQ4 answers above replace the v7 wording; v7 file remains in git history.