# Secrets & Credentials Audit

**Date:** 2026-02-20
**Auditor:** External Security Review
**Scope:** All project files for credential exposure

## Executive Summary

| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Hardcoded Secrets Found | 0 |
| Credential Files Exposed | 0 |
| Secret Patterns in Code | 0 |
| Gitignored Secret Files | Yes (.env, vendor/) |

**Overall Assessment: PASS** - Project follows good secret management practices.

---

## Detailed Analysis

### 1. Gitignore Configuration

**Status:** COMPLIANT

The `.gitignore` file properly excludes sensitive files:

```
# Environment variables
.env

# Vendor/cloned repositories
vendor/

# IDE files
.idea/
*.swp
```

#### Verification
- `.env` is gitignored - actual credentials not committed
- `vendor/` is gitignored - cloned repos with potential secrets not tracked
- No sensitive files found in git history (based on file analysis)

---

### 2. Environment Variable Template

**File:** `.env.example`
**Status:** COMPLIANT

The `.env.example` file uses placeholder values only:

```bash
# Example placeholders (not real credentials)
PROXMOX_HOST=https://your-proxmox-host:8006
PROXMOX_USER=root@pam
PROXMOX_TOKEN_NAME=your-token-name
PROXMOX_TOKEN_SECRET=your-token-secret
```

No actual credentials present.

---

### 3. Credential Flow Analysis

#### Pattern Identified
```
.env file (gitignored)
    ↓
Environment Variables
    ↓
Wrapper Scripts (mcp-*-wrapper.sh)
    ↓
Docker Containers
```

#### Wrapper Script Pattern
```bash
#!/bin/bash
docker run --rm -i \
  -e PROXMOX_HOST="${PROXMOX_HOST}" \
  -e PROXMOX_USER="${PROXMOX_USER}" \
  -e PROXMOX_TOKEN_SECRET="${PROXMOX_TOKEN_SECRET}" \
  kneldevstack-aimiddleware-proxmox-mcp
```

**Assessment:** Secure - credentials passed at runtime, not hardcoded.

---

### 4. Dockerfile Secret Analysis

#### ENV Directives Review
All ENV directives in Dockerfiles were analyzed:

| Dockerfile | ENV Variables | Assessment |
|------------|---------------|------------|
| proxmox-mcp | PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1 | Safe - not a secret |
| bitwarden-mcp | NODE_ENV=production | Safe - not a secret |
| paperless-mcp | PAPERLESS_URL="" | Safe - URL only |
| penpot-mcp | PENPOT_URL=${PENPOT_URL:-default} | Safe - URL only |
| postizz-mcp | PORT=${PORT} | Safe - port number |

**No secrets found in ENV directives.**

---

### 5. Potential Secret Patterns Searched

| Pattern | Files Found | Assessment |
|---------|-------------|------------|
| API_KEY=... | 0 | None in codebase |
| PASSWORD=... | 0 | None in codebase |
| SECRET=... | 0 | None in codebase |
| TOKEN=... | 0 | None in codebase |
| AWS_ACCESS_KEY | 0 | None in codebase |
| PRIVATE_KEY | 0 | None in codebase |
| -----BEGIN.*KEY----- | 0 | None in codebase |
| Bearer [A-Za-z0-9]{20,} | 0 | None in codebase |

---

### 6. Test Script Credentials

**File:** `scripts/validate-all.sh`

Contains test credentials for validation:
```bash
# Test credentials for validation purposes only
TEST_USER="testuser"
TEST_PASS="testpass123"
```

**Assessment:** ACCEPTABLE - clearly test credentials for validation, not production.

---

### 7. Build-Time Secret Exposure

**File:** `dockerfiles/postizz-mcp/Dockerfile`

#### Issue Identified
Build arguments potentially expose configuration:

```dockerfile
ARG POSTIZ_WEB_URL=${POSTIZ_WEB_URL}
ENV PORT=${PORT}
```

#### Risk Assessment
- **URL exposure:** Low risk (not a secret)
- **PORT exposure:** Minimal risk (non-sensitive)
- **No API keys in build args:** Confirmed

**Note:** While not currently a security issue, this pattern could lead to secrets being embedded if future changes add API keys as build arguments.

---

## Credential Categories

### Services Requiring Credentials

| Service | Credential Type | Storage |
|---------|-----------------|---------|
| proxmox-mcp | API Token | .env file |
| docker-mcp | Docker Socket | Mount |
| kubernetes-mcp | kubeconfig | File mount |
| ssh-mcp | SSH Private Key | File mount |
| bitwarden-mcp | Access Token | .env file |
| ghost-mcp | API Key | .env file |
| elasticsearch-mcp | Basic Auth | .env file |
| nextcloud-mcp | App Password | .env file |

### Services Without Credentials
Most MCP servers operate without requiring credentials or accept configuration at runtime.

---

## Recommendations

### 1. Add Secret Scanning to CI/CD (MEDIUM PRIORITY)

Implement automated secret detection:

```yaml
# GitHub Actions example
- name: Secret Scan
  uses: trufflesecurity/trufflehog@main
  with:
    path: ./
    base: ${{ github.event.repository.default_branch }}
```

### 2. Document Required Secrets (LOW PRIORITY)

Create documentation listing required credentials per service:

```markdown
## proxmox-mcp
- PROXMOX_HOST (required)
- PROXMOX_USER (required)
- PROXMOX_TOKEN_NAME (required)
- PROXMOX_TOKEN_SECRET (required, secret)
```

### 3. Consider Secrets Management (FUTURE)

For production deployment, consider:
- HashiCorp Vault
- AWS Secrets Manager
- Docker Secrets
- Kubernetes Secrets

---

## Positive Findings Summary

1. **No hardcoded secrets** in any tracked file
2. **Proper .gitignore** excludes .env and vendor/
3. **Placeholder-only .env.example** - no real credentials
4. **Runtime credential injection** - not in images
5. **No secrets in git history** based on file analysis
6. **Consistent secure patterns** across wrapper scripts

---

## Compliance Check

| Requirement | Status | Notes |
|-------------|--------|-------|
| No hardcoded secrets | PASS | Full codebase scanned |
| Secrets not in git | PASS | .env gitignored |
| No secrets in Docker images | PASS | Runtime injection only |
| Placeholder examples only | PASS | .env.example clean |
| No secrets in logs | N/A | No logging review performed |

**Overall Secrets Audit: PASS**