tahoe-lafs/docs/performance.txt
2010-02-01 21:27:50 -08:00

128 lines
5.4 KiB
Plaintext

= Performance costs for some common operations =
=== Publishing an A-byte immutable file ===
cost: O(A)
notes: An immutable file upload requires an additional I/O pass over the entire
source file before the upload process can start, since convergent
encryption derives the encryption key in part from the contents of the
source file.
=== Publishing an A-byte mutable file ===
cost: O(A) + a large constant for RSA + memory usage.
notes: Tahoe-LAFS generates a new RSA keypair for each mutable file that
it publishes to a grid. This takes up to 1 or 2 seconds on a
typical desktop PC.
Part of the process of encrypting, encoding, and uploading a
mutable file to a Tahoe-LAFS grid requires that the entire file
be in memory at once. For larger files, this may cause
Tahoe-LAFS to have an unacceptably large memory footprint (at
least when uploading a mutable file).
=== Downloading B bytes of an A-byte immutable file ===
time/cost until the read is satisfied: variable; up to O(A).
cost of the entire operation: O(A) if the file isn't cached.
notes: When asked to read an arbitrary range of an immutable file,
Tahoe-LAFS will download from the beginning of the file up until
it has enough of the file to satisfy the requested read.
Depending on where in the file the requested range is, this can
mean that the entire file is downloaded before the request is
satisfied. Tahoe-LAFS will continue to download the rest of the
file even after the request is satisfied, so in any case where the
file actually has to downloaded from the grid, reading part of an
immutable file will result in downloading all of the immutable
file. Ticket #798 is a proposal to change this behavior.
Tahoe-LAFS will cache files that are read in this manner for a
short while, so subsequent reads of the same file may be served
entirely from cache, depending on what part of the file they need
to read, what part of the file was read by previous reads, and
how much time has elapsed since the last read.
=== Downloading B bytes of an A-byte mutable file ===
cost: O(A)
notes: As currently implemented, mutable files must be downloaded in
their entirety before any part of them can be read. We are
exploring fixes for this; see ticket #393 for more information.
=== Modifying B bytes of an A-byte mutable file ===
cost: O(A)
notes: If you upload a changed version of a mutable file that you
earlier put onto your grid with, say, 'tahoe put --mutable',
Tahoe-LAFS will replace the old file with the new file on the
grid, rather than attempting to modify only those portions of the
file that have changed. Modifying a file in this manner is
essentially uploading the file over again, except that it re-uses
the existing RSA keypair instead of generating a new one.
=== Adding/Removing B bytes in an A-byte mutable file ===
cost: O(A)
notes: Modifying any part of a mutable file in Tahoe-LAFS requires that
the entire file be downloaded, modified, held in memory while it
is encrypted and encoded, and then re-uploaded. Note that this
sort of modification is mostly used internally for directories,
and isn't something that the WUI, CLI, or other interfaces will
do -- instead, they will simply overwrite the file to be
modified, as described in "Modifying B bytes of an A-byte mutable
file".
=== Adding an entry to an A-entry directory ===
cost: O(A) (roughly)
notes: In Tahoe-LAFS, directories are implemented as specialized mutable
files. So adding an entry to a directory is essentially adding B
(actually, 300-330) bytes somewhere in an existing mutable file.
=== Listing an A entry directory ===
cost: O(A)
notes: Listing a directory requires that the mutable file storing the
directory be downloaded from the grid. So listing an A entry
directory requires downloading a (roughly) 330 * A byte mutable
file, since each directory entry is about 300-330 bytes in size.
=== Checking an A-byte file ===
cost: variable; between O(N) and O(S), where N is the number of shares
generated when the file was initially uploaded, and S is the
number of servers on your grid.
notes: To check a file, Tahoe-LAFS queries the servers that it knows
about until it either runs out of servers, or finds all of the
shares that were originally uploaded. Note that neither of these
values directly depend on the size of the file. This is
relatively inexpensive, compared to the verify and repair
operations.
=== Verifying an A-byte file ===
cost: O(A)
notes: To verify a file, Tahoe-LAFS downloads all of the ciphertext
shares that were originally uploaded to the grid and integrity
checks them. This is, for well-behaved grids, likely to be more
expensive than downloading an A-byte file, since only a fraction
of these shares are necessary to recover the file.
=== Repairing an A-byte file (mutable or immutable) ===
cost: variable; up to around O(A)
notes: To repair a file, Tahoe-LAFS generates and uploads missing shares
in the same way as when it initially uploads the file. So,
depending on how many shares are missing, this can be about as
expensive as initially uploading the file in the first place.