we actually exercise during tests) into more specific exceptions, so they
don't get optimized away. The best rule to follow is probably this: if an
exception is worth testing, then it's part of the API, and AssertionError
should never be part of the API. Closes#749.
The idea is that future versions of Tahoe will add new URI types that this
version won't recognize, but might store them in directories that we *can*
read. We should handle these "objects from the future" as best we can.
Previous releases of Tahoe would just explode. With this change, we'll
continue to be able to work with everything else in the directory.
The code change is to wrap anything we don't recognize as an UnknownNode
instance (as opposed to a FileNode or DirectoryNode). Then webapi knows how
to render these (mostly by leaving fields blank), deep-check knows to skip
over them, deep-stats counts them in "count-unknown". You can rename and
delete these things, but you can't add new ones (because we wouldn't know how
to generate a readcap to put into the dirnode's rocap slot, and because this
lets us catch typos better).
Also allow an optional leading "http://127.0.0.1:8123/uri/".
Also fix a few unit tests to generate bogus Dirnode URIs of the modern form instead of the former form.
The URI typenames need revision, and only a few dirnode methods are
implemented. Filenodes are non-functional, but URI/key-management is in
place. There are a lot of classes with names like "NewDirectoryNode" that
will need to be rename once we decide what (if any) backwards compatibility
want to retain.
