ExternalVendorCode/tahoe-lafs
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/tahoe-lafs/tahoe-lafs.git synced 2024-12-22 06:17:50 +00:00
Code Issues Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
12,178 Commits 185 Branches 90 Tags 89 MiB
ed203817d7
Commit Graph

61 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sajith Sasidharan
626eba53b8 Run coveralls --finish to indicate completion 2021-03-27 10:17:22 -04:00
Sajith Sasidharan
32b2e93302 Use newer version of coveralls for reporting 2021-03-27 10:03:12 -04:00
Itamar Turner-Trauring
38da89a7b5 Try to unbreak Hypothesis in CI. 2021-02-23 09:52:30 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
7864330562 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 3385.coveralls-for-coverage-reports 2021-02-12 12:58:49 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
ed92202762 Updates comments about GitHub cache action 2021-01-18 17:55:07 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
9e4ea0c491 Use fetch-depth of 0 with GitHub Actions 
Using a fetch-depth of 0 should have the same effect as as `git fetch
--prune --unshallow` after doing a shallow checkout.
 2021-01-18 17:54:17 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
99cca0ea8e No need of upgrading pip on GitHub Actions 2021-01-18 13:38:09 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
adbe23fe7a Add a note about pip version on GitHub Actions 2021-01-18 13:34:25 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
2a1a5cb0a5 GitHub Actions have sufficiently recent pip 
At the time of writing this commit message, GitHub Actions offers pip
v20.3.3 for both ubuntu-latest and windows-latest, and pip v20.3.1 for
macos-latest.  Those are sufficiently recent pip versions that have
"cache dir" sub-command.
 2021-01-18 13:32:53 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
1f1a30095e Get pip version for all three GitHub Actions OSes 2021-01-18 13:22:04 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
8bf068f991 What's the pip version on GitHub Actions? 
There's no need of upgrading pip if GA offers a sufficiently new pip.
 2021-01-18 13:19:33 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
f731159cd7 Install Python packages after setting up pip cache 2021-01-18 13:13:32 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
573ab8768b Re-title "use pip cache" step in GitHub Actions 2021-01-18 11:08:56 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
27a122088c Use pip cache on GitHub Actions 
Using the method outlined in https://github.com/actions/cache/blob/main/examples.md#using-pip-to-get-cache-location
 2021-01-18 11:02:55 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
fa1a8e8371 Upgrade pip used in GitHub Actions 
From pip 20.1+ onward, "pip cache dir" can be used to find location of
pip cache, and this is useful across all three major OSes supported by
GitHub Actions.
 2021-01-18 10:58:12 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
e72c93a982 explain why we're not using the github action here 2021-01-08 08:52:38 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
5614c4c3f4 improve this comment marginally 
just looking for an excuse to trigger another build and see if inviting
"coveralls" to be a collaborator on LeastAuthority/tahoe-lafs fixes the status
reporting issue.
 2021-01-08 08:27:00 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
709823e562 most of those words proved irrelevant 2021-01-07 18:24:57 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
3b8df95e3e Try constructing build_num differently for push 2021-01-06 21:09:33 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
e382ef8a89 Clean up the explanation, link to some more/better stuff 2021-01-06 20:27:41 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
f5ba293f79 Ideally this is no longer necessary 2021-01-06 20:27:17 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
e3a6f43dc9 less shell wankery 2021-01-06 16:43:11 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
59e385c00f apparently it doesn't have remotes in there 2021-01-06 16:24:53 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
d515887ba1 This is probably faster and may actually work 
`git fetch --prune --unshallow` doesn't seem to get
refs/remotes/pull/<PR>/merge but that's okay because HEAD is already set to that
 2021-01-06 16:16:36 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
89c54af01d Guess we need the rest of the repo too, surprise. 2021-01-06 16:05:35 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
fac12210cb Can't do that Git stuff without a checkout 
Maybe *that* is why `coveralls --finish` fails?
 2021-01-06 15:58:48 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
52c42b5118 dump this info, who knows how many more rounds this will take 2021-01-06 15:48:20 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
24a531474d So much for my ability to read and understand a Python program 
coveralls complained:

{"error":"No build matching CI build number 467026020 found"}

So try constructing a build_num that looks like the value we observed from
`coveralls` output when it was submitting coverage data.
 2021-01-06 15:38:12 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
4d2782c178 Hahaha. Resolve the variable, don't just include its name. 2021-01-06 14:57:31 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
8e8a7d82c6 it was one or the other. turns out it was the other. 2021-01-06 14:33:31 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
f24cc5da0c The angrier I am the more words I write 2021-01-06 14:33:00 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
adf3518fc1 Okay I guess that served its purpose 2021-01-06 14:32:48 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
4b65751f51 Debug the earlier submissions to see what build_num they're providing 2021-01-06 09:01:08 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
f3aca51e35 run in debug mode to collect info for bug report 2021-01-05 20:52:02 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
9a8a61b740 Further tweaks to help the last step 2021-01-05 20:31:32 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
bebcca39f6 Switch to coveralls-python, maybe it works better 2021-01-05 20:09:46 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
3fb412eda1 Perhaps this is the correct github-token to use. 
The coveralls docs might be wrong.
 2021-01-05 16:20:41 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
13bcd8170b Turn on Coveralls on GitHub actions 2021-01-05 15:57:10 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
c8aab085d7 Re-introduce vcpython27 in GitHub Actions 
Turns out that netifaces has not published a .whl package for Python
2.7 and 64-bit Windows.
 2020-11-25 08:17:40 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
525f2201c6 Do not install vcpython27 during Windows CI steps 
With zfec 1.5.4, wheel packages for Windows is available now.
Installing a compiler is no longer necessary.
 2020-10-15 14:17:53 -04:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
e107e11079 Remove references to the bare "coverage" tox environment 
* We stopped using Appveyor a while ago so entirely remove its configuration.
* There's no release step where coverage information is *examined* so why
  collect it?
* Switch GitHub Actions config to py27-coverage tox environment
 2020-08-27 10:37:50 -04:00
Sajith Sasidharan
9b68b484bd Run integration tests on Windows on GitHub Actions 
Integration tests are currently not run on Windows, because they
turned out to be a little unreliable: sometimes they fail, and when
that happens restarting the test would make things pass.

We will re-enable them and see what happens.
 2020-06-22 16:32:26 -04:00
Sajith Sasidharan
4b1ff9546c Do not install setuptools in pyinstaller step 
This is unnecessary, and likely was the result of copy-pasting.
 2020-05-13 12:06:11 -04:00
Sajith Sasidharan
f3d37e52db Upload PyInstaller package as a GitHub Actions artifact 2020-05-12 18:37:50 -04:00
Sajith Sasidharan
86184e9aa9 Do not install codecov in GitHub Actions packaging tests 2020-05-12 18:28:42 -04:00
Sajith Sasidharan
b1d7e99671 Try running PyInstaller-generated binary in GitHub Actions 2020-05-12 18:15:17 -04:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
e336d977dd
Filter push trigger down to master branch 2020-04-13 12:19:41 -04:00
Sajith Sasidharan
a38029f9db Remove on.release from workflow triggers 
Per GitHub's documentation for on.release events, `on.release` event
will run our workflow any time the `release` event occurs, but it is
unclear if Tahoe will need this yet.  Removing for now.
 2020-03-06 14:13:05 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
c4061fffa0 Fearlessly use codecov.io token 2020-02-27 23:15:51 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
29947aad86 Don't run coverage tests on Ubuntu 2020-02-26 09:19:37 -05:00