* remove Downloader.download_to_data/download_to_filename/download_to_filehandle
* remove download.Data/FileName/FileHandle targets
* remove filenode.download/download_to_data/download_to_filename methods
* leave Downloader.download (the whole Downloader will go away eventually)
* add util.consumer.MemoryConsumer/download_to_data, for convenience
(this is mostly used by unit tests, but it gets used by enough non-test
code to warrant putting it in allmydata.util)
* update tests
* removes about 180 lines of code. Yay negative code days!
Overall plan is to rewrite immutable/download.py and leave filenode.read() as
the sole read-side API.
Obviously requiring the code under test to perform within some limit isn't very meaningful if we raise the limit whenever the test goes outside of it.
But I still don't want to remove the test code which measures how many writes (and, elsewhere, how many reads) a client does in order to fulfill these duties.
Let this number -- now 20 -- stand as an approximation of the inefficiency of our code divided by my mental model of how many operations are actually optimal for these duties.
This is important, because if the repairer doesn't completely repair all kinds of corruption (as the current one doesn't), then the successive tests get messed up by assuming that the shares were uncorrupted when the test first set about to corrupt them.
This implements an immutable repairer by marrying a CiphertextDownloader to a CHKUploader. It extends the IDownloadTarget interface so that the downloader can provide some metadata that the uploader requires.
The processing is incremental -- it uploads the first segments before it finishes downloading the whole file. This is necessary so that you can repair large files without running out of RAM or using a temporary file on the repairer.
It requires only a verifycap, not a readcap. That is: it doesn't need or use the decryption key, only the integrity check codes.
There are several tests marked TODO and several instances of XXX in the source code. I intend to open tickets to document further improvements to functionality and testing, but the current version is probably good enough for Tahoe-1.3.0.
