We need to carefully document the licence of figleaf in order to get Tahoe-LAFS into Ubuntu Karmic Koala. However, figleaf isn't really a part of Tahoe-LAFS per se -- this is just a "convenience copy" of a development tool. The quickest way to make Tahoe-LAFS acceptable for Karmic then, is to remove figleaf from the Tahoe-LAFS tarball itself. People who want to run figleaf on Tahoe-LAFS (as everyone should want) can install figleaf themselves. I haven't tested this -- there may be incompatibilities between upstream figleaf and the copy that we had here...
This makes it more obvious that the Helper currently generates leases with
the Helper's own secrets, rather than getting values from the client, which
is arguably a bug that will likely be resolved with the Accounting project.
child of the client, access with client.downloader instead of
client.getServiceNamed("downloader"). The single "Downloader" instance is
scheduled for demolition anyways, to be replaced by individual
filenode.download calls.
* stop using IURI as an adapter
* pass cap strings around instead of URI instances
* move filenode/dirnode creation duties from Client to new NodeMaker class
* move other Client duties to KeyGenerator, SecretHolder, History classes
* stop passing Client reference to dirnode/filenode constructors
- pass less-powerful references instead, like StorageBroker or Uploader
* always create DirectoryNodes by wrapping a filenode (mutable for now)
* remove some specialized mock classes from unit tests
Detailed list of changes (done one at a time, then merged together)
always pass a string to create_node_from_uri(), not an IURI instance
always pass a string to IFilesystemNode constructors, not an IURI instance
stop using IURI() as an adapter, switch on cap prefix in create_node_from_uri()
client.py: move SecretHolder code out to a separate class
test_web.py: hush pyflakes
client.py: move NodeMaker functionality out into a separate object
LiteralFileNode: stop storing a Client reference
immutable Checker: remove Client reference, it only needs a SecretHolder
immutable Upload: remove Client reference, leave SecretHolder and StorageBroker
immutable Repairer: replace Client reference with StorageBroker and SecretHolder
immutable FileNode: remove Client reference
mutable.Publish: stop passing Client
mutable.ServermapUpdater: get StorageBroker in constructor, not by peeking into Client reference
MutableChecker: reference StorageBroker and History directly, not through Client
mutable.FileNode: removed unused indirection to checker classes
mutable.FileNode: remove Client reference
client.py: move RSA key generation into a separate class, so it can be passed to the nodemaker
move create_mutable_file() into NodeMaker
test_dirnode.py: stop using FakeClient mockups, use NoNetworkGrid instead. This simplifies the code, but takes longer to run (17s instead of 6s). This should come down later when other cleanups make it possible to use simpler (non-RSA) fake mutable files for dirnode tests.
test_mutable.py: clean up basedir names
client.py: move create_empty_dirnode() into NodeMaker
dirnode.py: get rid of DirectoryNode.create
remove DirectoryNode.init_from_uri, refactor NodeMaker for customization, simplify test_web's mock Client to match
stop passing Client to DirectoryNode, make DirectoryNode.create_with_mutablefile the normal DirectoryNode constructor, start removing client from NodeMaker
remove Client from NodeMaker
move helper status into History, pass History to web.Status instead of Client
test_mutable.py: fix minor typo
webapi.txt: clarify replace=only-files argument, mention replace= on POST t=uri
test_cli.py: insert whitespace between logical operations
web.common.parse_replace_arg: make it case-insensitive, to match the docs
we actually exercise during tests) into more specific exceptions, so they
don't get optimized away. The best rule to follow is probably this: if an
exception is worth testing, then it's part of the API, and AssertionError
should never be part of the API. Closes#749.
not just the dirnode writecap. The previous code (which only hashed the
dirnode writecap) would use the same key for all children, which is very bad.
This is the correct implementation of #750.
If you open up a directory containing thousands of files, it currently computes the cache filename and checks for the cache file on disk immediately for each immutble file in that directory. With this patch, it delays those steps until you try to do something with an immutable file that could use the cache.
The idea is that future versions of Tahoe will add new URI types that this
version won't recognize, but might store them in directories that we *can*
read. We should handle these "objects from the future" as best we can.
Previous releases of Tahoe would just explode. With this change, we'll
continue to be able to work with everything else in the directory.
The code change is to wrap anything we don't recognize as an UnknownNode
instance (as opposed to a FileNode or DirectoryNode). Then webapi knows how
to render these (mostly by leaving fields blank), deep-check knows to skip
over them, deep-stats counts them in "count-unknown". You can rename and
delete these things, but you can't add new ones (because we wouldn't know how
to generate a readcap to put into the dirnode's rocap slot, and because this
lets us catch typos better).
This reduces the total test time on my laptop from 400s to 283s.
* src/allmydata/test/test_system.py (SystemTest.test_mutable._test_debug):
Remove assertion about container_size/data_size, this changes with keysize
and was too variable anyways.
* src/allmydata/mutable/filenode.py (MutableFileNode.create): add keysize=
* src/allmydata/dirnode.py (NewDirectoryNode.create): same
* src/allmydata/client.py (Client.DEFAULT_MUTABLE_KEYSIZE): add default,
this overrides the one in MutableFileNode
This will at least turn the really really weird error when a repair of a
readonly mutable file is attempted into a merely really weird assertion that
mentions "repair currently requires a writecap".
Instead of testing to see that the previous SDMF filesize limit was being
obeyed, we now test to make sure that we can insert files larger than that
limit.
