ExternalVendorCode/tahoe-lafs
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/tahoe-lafs/tahoe-lafs.git synced 2024-12-22 06:17:50 +00:00
Code Issues Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
12,223 Commits 185 Branches 90 Tags 89 MiB
2a62086323
Commit Graph

74 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sajith Sasidharan
2a62086323 Turn down coveralls verbosity 2021-03-31 19:16:58 -04:00
Sajith Sasidharan
d17f3d36c2 Run coveralls verbosely 2021-03-31 17:57:44 -04:00
Sajith Sasidharan
2e67e07081 Just don't run coverage tests with Python 3.6 + Windows 
Another test matrix setup I tried is this:

  jobs:
    coverage:
        matrix:
          os:
            - macos-latest
            - windows-latest
            - ubuntu-latest
          python-version:
            - 2.7
          include:
            - python-version: 3.6
              os:
                - macos-latest
                - ubuntu-latest
            - python-version: 3.6
              os: windows-latest
              experimental: true

But that failed on Python 3.6 + macOS with a simple error message, and
no further explanation: "This check failed".  Huh?

Might simply exclude Windows altogether, because that approach sort of
worked in another experiment.
 2021-03-31 16:42:39 -04:00
Sajith Sasidharan
1351a62ac4 Expect coverage tests to fail on Python 3.6 + Windows 2021-03-31 16:13:41 -04:00
Sajith Sasidharan
dd3b95a0bd Add ubuntu-latest to GitHub Actions matrix 2021-03-31 15:55:05 -04:00
Sajith Sasidharan
aebbc52f06 Add Python 3.6 to GitHub Actions test matrix 
Let us send more coverage reports to coveralls.io
 2021-03-31 15:55:05 -04:00
Sajith Sasidharan
88e3005abb Quote some YAML strings 
Following PR review feedback.

Some parts of GitHub Actions configuration follows convention in GA's
documentation, in which YAML strings are not quoted, but that probably
is not a good idea.  We also don't want to change all the strings in
this unrelated set of changes.  So we will quote strings as we go, in
the blocks we touch.
 2021-03-31 11:53:02 -04:00
Sajith Sasidharan
4e4faee5fd Update notes about coveralls versions 2021-03-27 10:21:34 -04:00
Sajith Sasidharan
626eba53b8 Run coveralls --finish to indicate completion 2021-03-27 10:17:22 -04:00
Sajith Sasidharan
32b2e93302 Use newer version of coveralls for reporting 2021-03-27 10:03:12 -04:00
Itamar Turner-Trauring
38da89a7b5 Try to unbreak Hypothesis in CI. 2021-02-23 09:52:30 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
7864330562 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 3385.coveralls-for-coverage-reports 2021-02-12 12:58:49 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
e6b3d59501 try to link to the same thing more robustly 2021-01-26 09:58:08 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
c451d947ff Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into patch-1 2021-01-26 09:57:05 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
ed92202762 Updates comments about GitHub cache action 2021-01-18 17:55:07 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
9e4ea0c491 Use fetch-depth of 0 with GitHub Actions 
Using a fetch-depth of 0 should have the same effect as as `git fetch
--prune --unshallow` after doing a shallow checkout.
 2021-01-18 17:54:17 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
99cca0ea8e No need of upgrading pip on GitHub Actions 2021-01-18 13:38:09 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
adbe23fe7a Add a note about pip version on GitHub Actions 2021-01-18 13:34:25 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
2a1a5cb0a5 GitHub Actions have sufficiently recent pip 
At the time of writing this commit message, GitHub Actions offers pip
v20.3.3 for both ubuntu-latest and windows-latest, and pip v20.3.1 for
macos-latest.  Those are sufficiently recent pip versions that have
"cache dir" sub-command.
 2021-01-18 13:32:53 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
1f1a30095e Get pip version for all three GitHub Actions OSes 2021-01-18 13:22:04 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
8bf068f991 What's the pip version on GitHub Actions? 
There's no need of upgrading pip if GA offers a sufficiently new pip.
 2021-01-18 13:19:33 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
f731159cd7 Install Python packages after setting up pip cache 2021-01-18 13:13:32 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
573ab8768b Re-title "use pip cache" step in GitHub Actions 2021-01-18 11:08:56 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
27a122088c Use pip cache on GitHub Actions 
Using the method outlined in https://github.com/actions/cache/blob/main/examples.md#using-pip-to-get-cache-location
 2021-01-18 11:02:55 -05:00
Sajith Sasidharan
fa1a8e8371 Upgrade pip used in GitHub Actions 
From pip 20.1+ onward, "pip cache dir" can be used to find location of
pip cache, and this is useful across all three major OSes supported by
GitHub Actions.
 2021-01-18 10:58:12 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
e72c93a982 explain why we're not using the github action here 2021-01-08 08:52:38 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
5614c4c3f4 improve this comment marginally 
just looking for an excuse to trigger another build and see if inviting
"coveralls" to be a collaborator on LeastAuthority/tahoe-lafs fixes the status
reporting issue.
 2021-01-08 08:27:00 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
709823e562 most of those words proved irrelevant 2021-01-07 18:24:57 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
3b8df95e3e Try constructing build_num differently for push 2021-01-06 21:09:33 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
e382ef8a89 Clean up the explanation, link to some more/better stuff 2021-01-06 20:27:41 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
f5ba293f79 Ideally this is no longer necessary 2021-01-06 20:27:17 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
e3a6f43dc9 less shell wankery 2021-01-06 16:43:11 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
59e385c00f apparently it doesn't have remotes in there 2021-01-06 16:24:53 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
d515887ba1 This is probably faster and may actually work 
`git fetch --prune --unshallow` doesn't seem to get
refs/remotes/pull/<PR>/merge but that's okay because HEAD is already set to that
 2021-01-06 16:16:36 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
89c54af01d Guess we need the rest of the repo too, surprise. 2021-01-06 16:05:35 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
fac12210cb Can't do that Git stuff without a checkout 
Maybe *that* is why `coveralls --finish` fails?
 2021-01-06 15:58:48 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
52c42b5118 dump this info, who knows how many more rounds this will take 2021-01-06 15:48:20 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
24a531474d So much for my ability to read and understand a Python program 
coveralls complained:

{"error":"No build matching CI build number 467026020 found"}

So try constructing a build_num that looks like the value we observed from
`coveralls` output when it was submitting coverage data.
 2021-01-06 15:38:12 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
4d2782c178 Hahaha. Resolve the variable, don't just include its name. 2021-01-06 14:57:31 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
8e8a7d82c6 it was one or the other. turns out it was the other. 2021-01-06 14:33:31 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
f24cc5da0c The angrier I am the more words I write 2021-01-06 14:33:00 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
adf3518fc1 Okay I guess that served its purpose 2021-01-06 14:32:48 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
4b65751f51 Debug the earlier submissions to see what build_num they're providing 2021-01-06 09:01:08 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
f3aca51e35 run in debug mode to collect info for bug report 2021-01-05 20:52:02 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
9a8a61b740 Further tweaks to help the last step 2021-01-05 20:31:32 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
bebcca39f6 Switch to coveralls-python, maybe it works better 2021-01-05 20:09:46 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
3fb412eda1 Perhaps this is the correct github-token to use. 
The coveralls docs might be wrong.
 2021-01-05 16:20:41 -05:00
Jean-Paul Calderone
13bcd8170b Turn on Coveralls on GitHub actions 2021-01-05 15:57:10 -05:00
Viktoriia
3a0b72f34c
Update CONTRIBUTING.rst 
Changed 'Coding Standard' to 'Coding Standards'
 2020-12-15 14:11:26 +02:00
viktoriiasavchuk
8d439fd58d
Update CONTRIBUTING.rst 
Added link to the Contributor Code of Conduct, https://github.com/tahoe-lafs/tahoe-lafs/blob/master/docs/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
 2020-12-13 20:59:58 +02:00