From ff12263ed536e5704b27071d0c35859d4c179c75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jean-Paul Calderone Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 16:53:37 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] remove an extra extra word --- docs/proposed/http-storage-node-protocol.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/proposed/http-storage-node-protocol.rst b/docs/proposed/http-storage-node-protocol.rst index cc1dc6c1f..0df4cb743 100644 --- a/docs/proposed/http-storage-node-protocol.rst +++ b/docs/proposed/http-storage-node-protocol.rst @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ Just like the immutable version. On the other hand, checking the validity time period forces certificate regeneration (which comes with its own set of complexity). - A possible compromise is to recommend very certificates with validity periods of many years or decades. + A possible compromise is to recommend certificates with validity periods of many years or decades. "Recommend" may be read as "provide software supporting the generation of". What about key theft?