Merge pull request from LeastAuthority/3764.gbs-interaction-patterns

Add some GBS interaction examples

Fixes: ticket:3764
This commit is contained in:
Jean-Paul Calderone 2021-08-18 11:05:59 -04:00 committed by GitHub
commit 28758b8181
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
2 changed files with 140 additions and 0 deletions

@ -422,6 +422,15 @@ However, we decided this does not matter because:
therefore no proxy servers can perform any extra logging.
* Tahoe-LAFS itself does not currently log HTTP request URLs.
The response includes ``already-have`` and ``allocated`` for two reasons:
* If an upload is interrupted and the client loses its local state that lets it know it already uploaded some shares
then this allows it to discover this fact (by inspecting ``already-have``) and only upload the missing shares (indicated by ``allocated``).
* If an upload has completed a client may still choose to re-balance storage by moving shares between servers.
This might be because a server has become unavailable and a remaining server needs to store more shares for the upload.
It could also just be that the client's preferred servers have changed.
``PUT /v1/immutable/:storage_index/:share_number``
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@ -576,6 +585,136 @@ Just like ``GET /v1/mutable/:storage_index``.
Advise the server the data read from the indicated share was corrupt.
Just like the immutable version.
Sample Interactions
-------------------
Immutable Data
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1. Create a bucket for storage index ``AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA`` to hold two immutable shares, discovering that share ``1`` was already uploaded::
POST /v1/immutable/AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
{"renew-secret": "efgh", "cancel-secret": "ijkl",
"share-numbers": [1, 7], "allocated-size": 48}
200 OK
{"already-have": [1], "allocated": [7]}
#. Upload the content for immutable share ``7``::
PUT /v1/immutable/AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/7
Content-Range: bytes 0-15/48
<first 16 bytes of share data>
200 OK
PUT /v1/immutable/AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/7
Content-Range: bytes 16-31/48
<second 16 bytes of share data>
200 OK
PUT /v1/immutable/AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/7
Content-Range: bytes 32-47/48
<final 16 bytes of share data>
201 CREATED
#. Download the content of the previously uploaded immutable share ``7``::
GET /v1/immutable/AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA?share=7&offset=0&size=48
200 OK
<complete 48 bytes of previously uploaded data>
#. Renew the lease on all immutable shares in bucket ``AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA``::
POST /v1/lease/AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
{"renew-secret": "efgh"}
204 NO CONTENT
Mutable Data
~~~~~~~~~~~~
1. Create mutable share number ``3`` with ``10`` bytes of data in slot ``BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB``::
POST /v1/mutable/BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB/read-test-write
{
"secrets": {
"write-enabler": "abcd",
"lease-renew": "efgh",
"lease-cancel": "ijkl"
},
"test-write-vectors": {
3: {
"test": [{
"offset": 0,
"size": 1,
"operator": "eq",
"specimen": ""
}],
"write": [{
"offset": 0,
"data": "xxxxxxxxxx"
}],
"new-length": 10
}
},
"read-vector": []
}
200 OK
{
"success": true,
"data": []
}
#. Safely rewrite the contents of a known version of mutable share number ``3`` (or fail)::
POST /v1/mutable/BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB/read-test-write
{
"secrets": {
"write-enabler": "abcd",
"lease-renew": "efgh",
"lease-cancel": "ijkl"
},
"test-write-vectors": {
3: {
"test": [{
"offset": 0,
"size": <checkstring size>,
"operator": "eq",
"specimen": "<checkstring>"
}],
"write": [{
"offset": 0,
"data": "yyyyyyyyyy"
}],
"new-length": 10
}
},
"read-vector": []
}
200 OK
{
"success": true,
"data": []
}
#. Download the contents of share number ``3``::
GET /v1/mutable/BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB?share=3&offset=0&size=10
<complete 16 bytes of previously uploaded data>
#. Renew the lease on previously uploaded mutable share in slot ``BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB``::
POST /v1/lease/BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
{"renew-secret": "efgh"}
204 NO CONTENT
.. _RFC 7469: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7469#section-2.4
.. _RFC 7049: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7049#section-4

@ -0,0 +1 @@
The Great Black Swamp proposed specification now includes sample interactions to demonstrate expected usage patterns.