mirror of
https://github.com/tahoe-lafs/tahoe-lafs.git
synced 2024-12-19 04:57:54 +00:00
Match latest GBS spec.
This commit is contained in:
parent
7c25e1533f
commit
00972ba3c6
@ -103,11 +103,8 @@ Version 1
|
||||
|
||||
The hash component of a version 1 NURL differs in three ways from the prior version.
|
||||
|
||||
1. The hash function used is SHA3-224 instead of SHA1.
|
||||
The security of SHA1 `continues to be eroded`_.
|
||||
Contrariwise SHA3 is currently the most recent addition to the SHA family by NIST.
|
||||
The 224 bit instance is chosen to keep the output short and because it offers greater collision resistance than SHA1 was thought to offer even at its inception
|
||||
(prior to security research showing actual collision resistance is lower).
|
||||
1. The hash function used is SHA-256, to match RFC 7469.
|
||||
The security of SHA1 `continues to be eroded`_; Latacora `SHA-2`_.
|
||||
2. The hash is computed over the certificate's SPKI instead of the whole certificate.
|
||||
This allows certificate re-generation so long as the public key remains the same.
|
||||
This is useful to allow contact information to be updated or extension of validity period.
|
||||
@ -140,7 +137,8 @@ Examples
|
||||
* ``pb://azEu8vlRpnEeYm0DySQDeNY3Z2iJXHC_bsbaAw@localhost:47877/64i4aokv4ej#v=1``
|
||||
|
||||
.. _`continues to be eroded`: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-1#Cryptanalysis_and_validation
|
||||
.. _`explored by the web community`: https://www.imperialviolet.org/2011/05/04/pinning.html
|
||||
.. _`SHA-2`: https://latacora.micro.blog/2018/04/03/cryptographic-right-answers.html
|
||||
.. _`explored by the web community`: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7469
|
||||
.. _Foolscap: https://github.com/warner/foolscap
|
||||
|
||||
.. [1] ``foolscap.furl.decode_furl`` is taken as the canonical definition of the syntax of a fURL.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user