tahoe-lafs/docs/garbage-collection.rst

===========================
Garbage Collection in Tahoe
===========================

1. `Overview`_
2. `Client-side Renewal`_
3. `Server Side Expiration`_
4. `Expiration Progress`_
5. `Future Directions`_

Overview
========

When a file or directory in the virtual filesystem is no longer referenced,
the space that its shares occupied on each storage server can be freed,
making room for other shares. Tahoe currently uses a garbage collection
("GC") mechanism to implement this space-reclamation process. Each share has
one or more "leases", which are managed by clients who want the
file/directory to be retained. The storage server accepts each share for a
pre-defined period of time, and is allowed to delete the share if all of the
leases are cancelled or allowed to expire.

Garbage collection is not enabled by default: storage servers will not delete
shares without being explicitly configured to do so. When GC is enabled,
clients are responsible for renewing their leases on a periodic basis at
least frequently enough to prevent any of the leases from expiring before the
next renewal pass.

There are several tradeoffs to be considered when choosing the renewal timer
and the lease duration, and there is no single optimal pair of values. See
the `<lease-tradeoffs.svg>`_ diagram to get an idea for the tradeoffs involved.
If lease renewal occurs quickly and with 100% reliability, than any renewal
time that is shorter than the lease duration will suffice, but a larger ratio
of duration-over-renewal-time will be more robust in the face of occasional
delays or failures.

The current recommended values for a small Tahoe grid are to renew the leases
once a week, and give each lease a duration of 31 days. In the current
release, there is not yet a way to create a lease with a different duration,
but the server can use the ``expire.override_lease_duration`` configuration
setting to increase or decrease the effective duration (when the lease is
processed) to something other than 31 days.

Renewing leases can be expected to take about one second per file/directory,
depending upon the number of servers and the network speeds involved.

Client-side Renewal
===================

If all of the files and directories which you care about are reachable from a
single starting point (usually referred to as a "rootcap"), and you store
that rootcap as an alias (via "``tahoe create-alias``" for example), then the
simplest way to renew these leases is with the following CLI command::

  tahoe deep-check --add-lease ALIAS:

This will recursively walk every directory under the given alias and renew
the leases on all files and directories. (You may want to add a ``--repair``
flag to perform repair at the same time.) Simply run this command once a week
(or whatever other renewal period your grid recommends) and make sure it
completes successfully. As a side effect, a manifest of all unique files and
directories will be emitted to stdout, as well as a summary of file sizes and
counts. It may be useful to track these statistics over time.

Note that newly uploaded files (and newly created directories) get an initial
lease too: the ``--add-lease`` process is only needed to ensure that all
older objects have up-to-date leases on them.

A separate "rebalancing manager/service" is also planned -- see ticket
`#543 <http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/543>`_. The exact
details of what this service will do are not settled, but it is likely to
work by acquiring manifests from rootcaps on a periodic basis, keeping track
of checker results, managing lease-addition, and prioritizing repair and
rebalancing of shares. Eventually it may use multiple worker nodes to perform
these jobs in parallel.

Server Side Expiration
======================

Expiration must be explicitly enabled on each storage server, since the
default behavior is to never expire shares. Expiration is enabled by adding
config keys to the ``[storage]`` section of the ``tahoe.cfg`` file (as described
below) and restarting the server node.

Each lease has two parameters: a create/renew timestamp and a duration. The
timestamp is updated when the share is first uploaded (i.e. the file or
directory is created), and updated again each time the lease is renewed (i.e.
"``tahoe check --add-lease``" is performed). The duration is currently fixed
at 31 days, and the "nominal lease expiration time" is simply $duration
seconds after the $create_renew timestamp. (In a future release of Tahoe, the
client will get to request a specific duration, and the server will accept or
reject the request depending upon its local configuration, so that servers
can achieve better control over their storage obligations.)

The lease-expiration code has two modes of operation. The first is age-based:
leases are expired when their age is greater than their duration. This is the
preferred mode: as long as clients consistently update their leases on a
periodic basis, and that period is shorter than the lease duration, then all
active files and directories will be preserved, and the garbage will
collected in a timely fashion.

Since there is not yet a way for clients to request a lease duration of other
than 31 days, there is a ``tahoe.cfg`` setting to override the duration of all
leases. If, for example, this alternative duration is set to 60 days, then
clients could safely renew their leases with an add-lease operation perhaps
once every 50 days: even though nominally their leases would expire 31 days
after the renewal, the server would not actually expire the leases until 60
days after renewal.

The other mode is an absolute-date-cutoff: it compares the create/renew
timestamp against some absolute date, and expires any lease which was not
created or renewed since the cutoff date. If all clients have performed an
add-lease some time after March 20th, you could tell the storage server to
expire all leases that were created or last renewed on March 19th or earlier.
This is most useful if you have a manual (non-periodic) add-lease process.
Note that there is not much point to running a storage server in this mode
for a long period of time: once the lease-checker has examined all shares and
expired whatever it is going to expire, the second and subsequent passes are
not going to find any new leases to remove.

The ``tahoe.cfg`` file uses the following keys to control lease expiration:

``[storage]``

``expire.enabled = (boolean, optional)``

    If this is ``True``, the storage server will delete shares on which all
    leases have expired. Other controls dictate when leases are considered to
    have expired. The default is ``False``.

``expire.mode = (string, "age" or "cutoff-date", required if expiration enabled)``

    If this string is "age", the age-based expiration scheme is used, and the
    ``expire.override_lease_duration`` setting can be provided to influence the
    lease ages. If it is "cutoff-date", the absolute-date-cutoff mode is
    used, and the ``expire.cutoff_date`` setting must be provided to specify
    the cutoff date. The mode setting currently has no default: you must
    provide a value.

    In a future release, this setting is likely to default to "age", but in
    this release it was deemed safer to require an explicit mode
    specification.

``expire.override_lease_duration = (duration string, optional)``

    When age-based expiration is in use, a lease will be expired if its
    ``lease.create_renew`` timestamp plus its ``lease.duration`` time is
    earlier/older than the current time. This key, if present, overrides the
    duration value for all leases, changing the algorithm from::

      if (lease.create_renew_timestamp + lease.duration) < now:
          expire_lease()

    to::

      if (lease.create_renew_timestamp + override_lease_duration) < now:
          expire_lease()

    The value of this setting is a "duration string", which is a number of
    days, months, or years, followed by a units suffix, and optionally
    separated by a space, such as one of the following::

      7days
      31day
      60 days
      2mo
      3 month
      12 months
      2years

    This key is meant to compensate for the fact that clients do not yet have
    the ability to ask for leases that last longer than 31 days. A grid which
    wants to use faster or slower GC than a 31-day lease timer permits can
    use this parameter to implement it.

    This key is only valid when age-based expiration is in use (i.e. when
    ``expire.mode = age`` is used). It will be rejected if cutoff-date
    expiration is in use.

``expire.cutoff_date = (date string, required if mode=cutoff-date)``

    When cutoff-date expiration is in use, a lease will be expired if its
    create/renew timestamp is older than the cutoff date. This string will be
    a date in the following format::

      2009-01-16   (January 16th, 2009)
      2008-02-02
      2007-12-25

    The actual cutoff time shall be midnight UTC at the beginning of the
    given day. Lease timers should naturally be generous enough to not depend
    upon differences in timezone: there should be at least a few days between
    the last renewal time and the cutoff date.

    This key is only valid when cutoff-based expiration is in use (i.e. when
    "expire.mode = cutoff-date"). It will be rejected if age-based expiration
    is in use.

  expire.immutable = (boolean, optional)

    If this is False, then immutable shares will never be deleted, even if
    their leases have expired. This can be used in special situations to
    perform GC on mutable files but not immutable ones. The default is True.

  expire.mutable = (boolean, optional)

    If this is False, then mutable shares will never be deleted, even if
    their leases have expired. This can be used in special situations to
    perform GC on immutable files but not mutable ones. The default is True.

Expiration Progress
===================

In the current release, leases are stored as metadata in each share file, and
no separate database is maintained. As a result, checking and expiring leases
on a large server may require multiple reads from each of several million
share files. This process can take a long time and be very disk-intensive, so
a "share crawler" is used. The crawler limits the amount of time looking at
shares to a reasonable percentage of the storage server's overall usage: by
default it uses no more than 10% CPU, and yields to other code after 100ms. A
typical server with 1.1M shares was observed to take 3.5 days to perform this
rate-limited crawl through the whole set of shares, with expiration disabled.
It is expected to take perhaps 4 or 5 days to do the crawl with expiration
turned on.

The crawler's status is displayed on the "Storage Server Status Page", a web
page dedicated to the storage server. This page resides at $NODEURL/storage,
and there is a link to it from the front "welcome" page. The "Lease
Expiration crawler" section of the status page shows the progress of the
current crawler cycle, expected completion time, amount of space recovered,
and details of how many shares have been examined.

The crawler's state is persistent: restarting the node will not cause it to
lose significant progress. The state file is located in two files
($BASEDIR/storage/lease_checker.state and lease_checker.history), and the
crawler can be forcibly reset by stopping the node, deleting these two files,
then restarting the node.

Future Directions
=================

Tahoe's GC mechanism is undergoing significant changes. The global
mark-and-sweep garbage-collection scheme can require considerable network
traffic for large grids, interfering with the bandwidth available for regular
uploads and downloads (and for non-Tahoe users of the network).

A preferable method might be to have a timer-per-client instead of a
timer-per-lease: the leases would not be expired until/unless the client had
not checked in with the server for a pre-determined duration. This would
reduce the network traffic considerably (one message per week instead of
thousands), but retain the same general failure characteristics.

In addition, using timers is not fail-safe (from the client's point of view),
in that a client which leaves the network for an extended period of time may
return to discover that all of their files have been garbage-collected. (It
*is* fail-safe from the server's point of view, in that a server is not
obligated to provide disk space in perpetuity to an unresponsive client). It
may be useful to create a "renewal agent" to which a client can pass a list
of renewal-caps: the agent then takes the responsibility for keeping these
leases renewed, so the client can go offline safely. Of course, this requires
a certain amount of coordination: the renewal agent should not be keeping
files alive that the client has actually deleted. The client can send the
renewal-agent a manifest of renewal caps, and each new manifest should
replace the previous set.

The GC mechanism is also not immediate: a client which deletes a file will
nevertheless be consuming extra disk space (and might be charged or otherwise
held accountable for it) until the ex-file's leases finally expire on their
own. If the client is certain that they've removed their last reference to
the file, they could accelerate the GC process by cancelling their lease. The
current storage server API provides a method to cancel a lease, but the
client must be careful to coordinate with anyone else who might be
referencing the same lease (perhaps a second directory in the same virtual
drive), otherwise they might accidentally remove a lease that should have
been retained.

In the current release, these leases are each associated with a single "node
secret" (stored in $BASEDIR/private/secret), which is used to generate
renewal- and cancel- secrets for each lease. Two nodes with different secrets
will produce separate leases, and will not be able to renew or cancel each
others' leases.

Once the Accounting project is in place, leases will be scoped by a
sub-delegatable "account id" instead of a node secret, so clients will be able
to manage multiple leases per file. In addition, servers will be able to
identify which shares are leased by which clients, so that clients can safely
reconcile their idea of which files/directories are active against the
server's list, and explicitly cancel leases on objects that aren't on the
active list.

By reducing the size of the "lease scope", the coordination problem is made
easier. In general, mark-and-sweep is easier to implement (it requires mere
vigilance, rather than coordination), so unless the space used by deleted
files is not expiring fast enough, the renew/expire timed lease approach is
recommended.