openwrt/target/linux/generic/backport-5.4/080-wireguard-0089-wireguard-send-account-for-mtu-0-devices.patch
Jason A. Donenfeld 3888fa7880 kernel: 5.4: import wireguard backport
Rather than using the clunky, old, slower wireguard-linux-compat out of
tree module, this commit does a patch-by-patch backport of upstream's
wireguard to 5.4. This specific backport is in widespread use, being
part of SUSE's enterprise kernel, Oracle's enterprise kernel, Google's
Android kernel, Gentoo's distro kernel, and probably more I've forgotten
about. It's definately the "more proper" way of adding wireguard to a
kernel than the ugly compat.h hell of the wireguard-linux-compat repo.
And most importantly for OpenWRT, it allows using the same module
configuration code for 5.10 as for 5.4, with no need for bifurcation.

These patches are from the backport tree which is maintained in the
open here: https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-linux/log/?h=backport-5.4.y
I'll be sending PRs to update this as needed.

Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
2021-02-26 20:41:01 +01:00

96 lines
3.9 KiB
Diff

From 6e82ecb98d019209c77c73d0460535f1fcb3d8cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 23:57:22 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 089/124] wireguard: send: account for mtu=0 devices
commit 175f1ca9a9ed8689d2028da1a7c624bb4fb4ff7e upstream.
It turns out there's an easy way to get packets queued up while still
having an MTU of zero, and that's via persistent keep alive. This commit
makes sure that in whatever condition, we don't wind up dividing by
zero. Note that an MTU of zero for a wireguard interface is something
quasi-valid, so I don't think the correct fix is to limit it via
min_mtu. This can be reproduced easily with:
ip link add wg0 type wireguard
ip link add wg1 type wireguard
ip link set wg0 up mtu 0
ip link set wg1 up
wg set wg0 private-key <(wg genkey)
wg set wg1 listen-port 1 private-key <(wg genkey) peer $(wg show wg0 public-key)
wg set wg0 peer $(wg show wg1 public-key) persistent-keepalive 1 endpoint 127.0.0.1:1
However, while min_mtu=0 seems fine, it makes sense to restrict the
max_mtu. This commit also restricts the maximum MTU to the greatest
number for which rounding up to the padding multiple won't overflow a
signed integer. Packets this large were always rejected anyway
eventually, due to checks deeper in, but it seems more sound not to even
let the administrator configure something that won't work anyway.
We use this opportunity to clean up this function a bit so that it's
clear which paths we're expecting.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
---
drivers/net/wireguard/device.c | 7 ++++---
drivers/net/wireguard/send.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/wireguard/device.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/device.c
@@ -258,6 +258,8 @@ static void wg_setup(struct net_device *
enum { WG_NETDEV_FEATURES = NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_RXCSUM |
NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_GSO |
NETIF_F_GSO_SOFTWARE | NETIF_F_HIGHDMA };
+ const int overhead = MESSAGE_MINIMUM_LENGTH + sizeof(struct udphdr) +
+ max(sizeof(struct ipv6hdr), sizeof(struct iphdr));
dev->netdev_ops = &netdev_ops;
dev->hard_header_len = 0;
@@ -271,9 +273,8 @@ static void wg_setup(struct net_device *
dev->features |= WG_NETDEV_FEATURES;
dev->hw_features |= WG_NETDEV_FEATURES;
dev->hw_enc_features |= WG_NETDEV_FEATURES;
- dev->mtu = ETH_DATA_LEN - MESSAGE_MINIMUM_LENGTH -
- sizeof(struct udphdr) -
- max(sizeof(struct ipv6hdr), sizeof(struct iphdr));
+ dev->mtu = ETH_DATA_LEN - overhead;
+ dev->max_mtu = round_down(INT_MAX, MESSAGE_PADDING_MULTIPLE) - overhead;
SET_NETDEV_DEVTYPE(dev, &device_type);
--- a/drivers/net/wireguard/send.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/send.c
@@ -143,16 +143,22 @@ static void keep_key_fresh(struct wg_pee
static unsigned int calculate_skb_padding(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
+ unsigned int padded_size, last_unit = skb->len;
+
+ if (unlikely(!PACKET_CB(skb)->mtu))
+ return ALIGN(last_unit, MESSAGE_PADDING_MULTIPLE) - last_unit;
+
/* We do this modulo business with the MTU, just in case the networking
* layer gives us a packet that's bigger than the MTU. In that case, we
* wouldn't want the final subtraction to overflow in the case of the
- * padded_size being clamped.
+ * padded_size being clamped. Fortunately, that's very rarely the case,
+ * so we optimize for that not happening.
*/
- unsigned int last_unit = skb->len % PACKET_CB(skb)->mtu;
- unsigned int padded_size = ALIGN(last_unit, MESSAGE_PADDING_MULTIPLE);
+ if (unlikely(last_unit > PACKET_CB(skb)->mtu))
+ last_unit %= PACKET_CB(skb)->mtu;
- if (padded_size > PACKET_CB(skb)->mtu)
- padded_size = PACKET_CB(skb)->mtu;
+ padded_size = min(PACKET_CB(skb)->mtu,
+ ALIGN(last_unit, MESSAGE_PADDING_MULTIPLE));
return padded_size - last_unit;
}