openwrt/target/linux/bcm27xx/patches-6.1/950-0658-media-i2c-imx290-Fix-the-pixel-rate-at-148.5Mpix-s.patch
Álvaro Fernández Rojas 793f8ab62c bcm27xx: 6.1: add kernel patches
Add kernel patches for version 6.1.

Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
2023-06-09 19:12:30 +02:00

90 lines
3.1 KiB
Diff

From 5003200e5b6e1485515fe18aa5031769930e465e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:29:54 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] media: i2c: imx290: Fix the pixel rate at 148.5Mpix/s
Should be upstream commit 4381df0c756f
The datasheet lists the link frequency changes between
1080p and 720p modes. This is correct that the link frequency
changes as measured on an oscilloscope.
Link frequency is not necessarily the same as pixel rate.
The datasheet gives standard configurations for 1080p and 720p
modes at a number of frame rates.
Looking at the 1080p mode it gives:
HMAX = 0x898 = 2200
VMAX = 0x465 = 1125
2200 * 1125 * 60fps = 148.5MPix/s
Looking at the 720p mode it gives:
HMAX = 0xce4 = 3300
VMAX = 0x2ee = 750
3300 * 750 * 60fps = 148.5Mpix/s
This driver currently scales the pixel rate proportionally to the
link frequency, however the above shows that this is not the
correct thing to do, and currently all frame rate and exposure
calculations give incorrect results.
Correctly report the pixel rate as being 148.5MPix/s under any
mode.
Signed-off-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c | 16 +++++-----------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
@@ -110,6 +110,8 @@
#define IMX290_VMAX_DEFAULT 1125
+#define IMX290_PIXEL_RATE 148500000
+
/*
* The IMX290 pixel array is organized as follows:
*
@@ -208,7 +210,6 @@ struct imx290 {
struct v4l2_ctrl_handler ctrls;
struct v4l2_ctrl *link_freq;
- struct v4l2_ctrl *pixel_rate;
struct v4l2_ctrl *hblank;
struct v4l2_ctrl *vblank;
};
@@ -674,15 +675,8 @@ static void imx290_ctrl_update(struct im
{
unsigned int hblank = mode->hmax - mode->width;
unsigned int vblank = IMX290_VMAX_DEFAULT - mode->height;
- s64 link_freq = imx290_link_freqs_ptr(imx290)[mode->link_freq_index];
- u64 pixel_rate;
-
- /* pixel rate = link_freq * 2 * nr_of_lanes / bits_per_sample */
- pixel_rate = link_freq * 2 * imx290->nlanes;
- do_div(pixel_rate, imx290_format_info(imx290, format->code)->bpp);
__v4l2_ctrl_s_ctrl(imx290->link_freq, mode->link_freq_index);
- __v4l2_ctrl_s_ctrl_int64(imx290->pixel_rate, pixel_rate);
__v4l2_ctrl_modify_range(imx290->hblank, hblank, hblank, 1, hblank);
__v4l2_ctrl_modify_range(imx290->vblank, vblank, vblank, 1, vblank);
@@ -732,9 +726,9 @@ static int imx290_ctrl_init(struct imx29
if (imx290->link_freq)
imx290->link_freq->flags |= V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_READ_ONLY;
- imx290->pixel_rate = v4l2_ctrl_new_std(&imx290->ctrls, &imx290_ctrl_ops,
- V4L2_CID_PIXEL_RATE,
- 1, INT_MAX, 1, 1);
+ v4l2_ctrl_new_std(&imx290->ctrls, &imx290_ctrl_ops, V4L2_CID_PIXEL_RATE,
+ IMX290_PIXEL_RATE, IMX290_PIXEL_RATE, 1,
+ IMX290_PIXEL_RATE);
v4l2_ctrl_new_std_menu_items(&imx290->ctrls, &imx290_ctrl_ops,
V4L2_CID_TEST_PATTERN,