openwrt/target/linux/generic/backport-4.19/048-v4.21-mtd-improve-calculating-partition-boundaries-when-ch.patch
Hauke Mehrtens 9261e7447e kernel: Make the patches apply on top of 4.19
This makes the patches which were just copied in the previous commit
apply on top of kernel 4.19.

The patches in the backports-4.19 folder were checked if they are really
in kernel 4.19 based on the title and only removed if they were found in
the upstream kernel.

The following additional patches form the pending folder went into
upstream Linux 4.19:
pending-4.19/171-usb-dwc2-Fix-inefficient-copy-of-unaligned-buffers.patch
pending-4.19/190-2-5-e1000e-Fix-wrong-comment-related-to-link-detection.patch
pending-4.19/478-mtd-spi-nor-Add-support-for-XM25QH64A-and-XM25QH128A.patch
pending-4.19/479-mtd-spi-nor-add-eon-en25qh32.patch
pending-4.19/950-tty-serial-exar-generalize-rs485-setup.patch
pending-4.19/340-MIPS-mm-remove-mips_dma_mapping_error.patch

Bigger changes were introduced to the m25p80 spi nor driver, as far as I
saw it in the new code, it now has the functionality provided in this
patch:
pending-4.19/450-mtd-m25p80-allow-fallback-from-spi_flash_read-to-reg.patch

Part of this patch went upstream independent of OpenWrt:
hack-4.19/220-gc_sections.patch
This patch was reworked to match the changes done upstream.

The MIPS DMA API changed a lot, this patch was rewritten to match the
new DMA handling:
pending-4.19/341-MIPS-mm-remove-no-op-dma_map_ops-where-possible.patch

I did bigger manual changes to the following patches and I am not 100% sure if they are all correct:
pending-4.19/0931-w1-gpio-fix-problem-with-platfom-data-in-w1-gpio.patch
pending-4.19/411-mtd-partial_eraseblock_write.patch
pending-4.19/600-netfilter_conntrack_flush.patch
pending-4.19/611-netfilter_match_bypass_default_table.patch
pending-4.19/670-ipv6-allow-rejecting-with-source-address-failed-policy.patch
hack-4.19/211-host_tools_portability.patch
hack-4.19/221-module_exports.patch
hack-4.19/321-powerpc_crtsavres_prereq.patch
hack-4.19/902-debloat_proc.patch

This is based on patchset from Marko Ratkaj <marko.ratkaj@sartura.hr>

Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
2018-12-15 14:28:48 +01:00

56 lines
1.8 KiB
Diff

From 6750f61a13a0197c40e4a40739117493b15f19e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= <rafal@milecki.pl>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:24:09 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] mtd: improve calculating partition boundaries when checking
for alignment
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
When checking for alignment mtd should check absolute offsets. It's
important for subpartitions as it doesn't make sense to check their
relative addresses.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
---
drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
@@ -61,6 +61,15 @@ static inline struct mtd_part *mtd_to_pa
return container_of(mtd, struct mtd_part, mtd);
}
+static u64 part_absolute_offset(struct mtd_info *mtd)
+{
+ struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
+
+ if (!mtd_is_partition(mtd))
+ return 0;
+
+ return part_absolute_offset(part->parent) + part->offset;
+}
/*
* MTD methods which simply translate the effective address and pass through
@@ -514,7 +523,7 @@ static struct mtd_part *allocate_partiti
if (!(slave->mtd.flags & MTD_NO_ERASE))
wr_alignment = slave->mtd.erasesize;
- tmp = slave->offset;
+ tmp = part_absolute_offset(parent) + slave->offset;
remainder = do_div(tmp, wr_alignment);
if ((slave->mtd.flags & MTD_WRITEABLE) && remainder) {
/* Doesn't start on a boundary of major erase size */
@@ -525,7 +534,7 @@ static struct mtd_part *allocate_partiti
part->name);
}
- tmp = slave->mtd.size;
+ tmp = part_absolute_offset(parent) + slave->mtd.size;
remainder = do_div(tmp, wr_alignment);
if ((slave->mtd.flags & MTD_WRITEABLE) && remainder) {
slave->mtd.flags &= ~MTD_WRITEABLE;