openwrt/target/linux/ramips/dts/BR-6425.dts
John Crispin 1a392636a5 ramips: use consistent naming scheme for LEDs
The upstream LED naming convention is "device:color:led-name", but it seems that many of supported boards in OpenWrt don't follow this approach.
The following patch fixes this inconsistency in dts{,i} files and updates base-files scripts for ramips target:
 * fixes wrong indentation
 * keeps case statements structure in same convention as in other scripts (no empty line after ";;", no indentation for case...esac body)
 * fixes wrong LED names for some of boards (makes them the same as in dts{,i} files)
 * combines boards with same configuration (ex. set_wifi_led "rt2800pci-phy0::radio" in 01_leds)

Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz <pepe2k@gmail.com>

SVN-Revision: 46664
2015-08-17 06:24:34 +00:00

72 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext

/dts-v1/;
/include/ "rt3050.dtsi"
/ {
compatible = "BR-6425", "ralink,rt3052-soc";
model = "Edimax BR-6425";
pinctrl {
state_default: pinctrl0 {
gpio {
ralink,group = "spi", "i2c", "jtag", "rgmii", "mdio", "uartf";
ralink,function = "gpio";
};
};
};
cfi@1f000000 {
compatible = "cfi-flash";
reg = <0x1f000000 0x800000>;
bank-width = <2>;
device-width = <2>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
};
ethernet@10100000 {
mtd-mac-address = <&factory 0x4>;
};
esw@10110000 {
ralink,portmap = <0x2f>;
};
wmac@10180000 {
ralink,mtd-eeprom = <&factory 0>;
};
gpio-leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
power {
label = "br-6425:green:power";
gpios = <&gpio0 9 1>;
};
wlan {
label = "br-6425:orange:wlan";
gpios = <&gpio0 14 1>;
};
};
gpio-keys-polled {
compatible = "gpio-keys-polled";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
poll-interval = <20>;
reset_wps {
label = "reset_wps";
gpios = <&gpio0 12 1>;
linux,code = <0x198>;
};
rfkill {
label = "RFKILL switch";
gpios = <&gpio0 13 1>;
linux,code = <0xf7>;
};
};
};