openwrt/package/kernel/mac80211/patches/355-v5.0-0001-brcmfmac-Remove-firmware-loading-code-duplication.patch
Rafał Miłecki a8cc06c537 mac80211: brcmfmac: backport firmware loading changes & fix memory bugs
This pick most of brcmfmac changes backported into the master in commits
5932eb690f ("mac80211: brcmfmac: backport firmware loading cleanup")
3eab6b8275 ("mac80211: brcmfmac: backport NVRAM loading improvements")
529c95cc15 ("mac80211: brcmfmac: fix use-after-free & possible NULL pointer dereference")

It's more than would be normally backported into a stable branch but it
seems required. Firmware loading cleanups are needed to allow fix memory
bugs in a reliable way. Memory fixes are really important to avoid
corrupting memory and risking a NULL pointer dereference.

Hopefully this stuff has received enough testing in the master.

Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
2019-01-08 10:12:07 +01:00

103 lines
2.8 KiB
Diff

From a1a3b762163868ad07a4499a73df324f40d5ab0b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 13:00:58 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] brcmfmac: Remove firmware-loading code duplication
brcmf_fw_request_next_item and brcmf_fw_request_done both have identical
code to complete the fw-request depending on the item-type.
This commit adds a new brcmf_fw_complete_request helper removing this code
duplication.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
---
.../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/firmware.c | 62 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/firmware.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/firmware.c
@@ -504,6 +504,34 @@ fail:
return -ENOENT;
}
+static int brcmf_fw_complete_request(const struct firmware *fw,
+ struct brcmf_fw *fwctx)
+{
+ struct brcmf_fw_item *cur = &fwctx->req->items[fwctx->curpos];
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ brcmf_dbg(TRACE, "firmware %s %sfound\n", cur->path, fw ? "" : "not ");
+
+ switch (cur->type) {
+ case BRCMF_FW_TYPE_NVRAM:
+ ret = brcmf_fw_request_nvram_done(fw, fwctx);
+ break;
+ case BRCMF_FW_TYPE_BINARY:
+ if (fw)
+ cur->binary = fw;
+ else
+ ret = -ENOENT;
+ break;
+ default:
+ /* something fishy here so bail out early */
+ brcmf_err("unknown fw type: %d\n", cur->type);
+ release_firmware(fw);
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return (cur->flags & BRCMF_FW_REQF_OPTIONAL) ? 0 : ret;
+}
+
static int brcmf_fw_request_next_item(struct brcmf_fw *fwctx, bool async)
{
struct brcmf_fw_item *cur;
@@ -525,15 +553,7 @@ static int brcmf_fw_request_next_item(st
if (ret < 0) {
brcmf_fw_request_done(NULL, fwctx);
} else if (!async && fw) {
- brcmf_dbg(TRACE, "firmware %s %sfound\n", cur->path,
- fw ? "" : "not ");
- if (cur->type == BRCMF_FW_TYPE_BINARY)
- cur->binary = fw;
- else if (cur->type == BRCMF_FW_TYPE_NVRAM)
- brcmf_fw_request_nvram_done(fw, fwctx);
- else
- release_firmware(fw);
-
+ brcmf_fw_complete_request(fw, fwctx);
return -EAGAIN;
}
return 0;
@@ -547,28 +567,8 @@ static void brcmf_fw_request_done(const
cur = &fwctx->req->items[fwctx->curpos];
- brcmf_dbg(TRACE, "enter: firmware %s %sfound\n", cur->path,
- fw ? "" : "not ");
-
- if (!fw)
- ret = -ENOENT;
-
- switch (cur->type) {
- case BRCMF_FW_TYPE_NVRAM:
- ret = brcmf_fw_request_nvram_done(fw, fwctx);
- break;
- case BRCMF_FW_TYPE_BINARY:
- cur->binary = fw;
- break;
- default:
- /* something fishy here so bail out early */
- brcmf_err("unknown fw type: %d\n", cur->type);
- release_firmware(fw);
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto fail;
- }
-
- if (ret < 0 && !(cur->flags & BRCMF_FW_REQF_OPTIONAL))
+ ret = brcmf_fw_complete_request(fw, fwctx);
+ if (ret < 0)
goto fail;
do {