openwrt/target/linux/bcm27xx/patches-5.15/950-0867-clk-tests-Add-missing-test-case-for-ranges.patch
Álvaro Fernández Rojas 20ea6adbf1 bcm27xx: add support for linux v5.15
Build system: x86_64
Build-tested: bcm2708, bcm2709, bcm2710, bcm2711
Run-tested: bcm2708/RPiB+, bcm2709/RPi3B, bcm2710/RPi3B, bcm2711/RPi4B

Signed-off-by: Marty Jones <mj8263788@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
2022-05-17 15:11:22 +02:00

79 lines
2.5 KiB
Diff

From d75b267a431f5afd20cfea90021bb63cc8ecfc6b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 15:00:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] clk: tests: Add missing test case for ranges
Let's add a test on the rate range after a reparenting. This fails for
now, but it's worth having it to document the corner cases we don't
support yet.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
---
drivers/clk/clk_test.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
@@ -488,9 +488,61 @@ clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_has_parent
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_has_parent(clk, ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw.clk));
}
+/*
+ * Test that for a clock with a multiple parents, if we set a range on
+ * that clock and the parent is changed, its rate after the reparenting
+ * is still within the range we asked for.
+ *
+ * FIXME: clk_set_parent() only does the reparenting but doesn't
+ * reevaluate whether the new clock rate is within its boundaries or
+ * not.
+ */
+static void
+clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_set_range_set_parent_get_rate(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+ struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
+ struct clk *parent1, *parent2;
+ unsigned long rate;
+ int ret;
+
+ kunit_skip(test, "This needs to be fixed in the core.");
+
+ parent1 = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw, NULL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent1);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, clk_is_match(clk_get_parent(clk), parent1));
+
+ parent2 = clk_hw_get_clk(&ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw, NULL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, parent2);
+
+ ret = clk_set_rate(parent1, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ ret = clk_set_rate(parent2, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk,
+ DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000,
+ DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ ret = clk_set_parent(clk, parent2);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000);
+
+ clk_put(parent2);
+ clk_put(parent1);
+}
+
static struct kunit_case clk_multiple_parents_mux_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_get_parent),
KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_has_parent),
+ KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_multiple_parents_mux_set_range_set_parent_get_rate),
{}
};