openwrt/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.19/950-0678-w1-ds2413-when-the-slave-is-not-responding-during-re.patch
Álvaro Fernández Rojas 4295485719 brcm2708: add linux 4.19 support
Boot tested on Raspberry Pi B+ (BCM2708) and Raspberry Pi 2 (BCM2709)

Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
2019-07-14 12:44:14 +02:00

57 lines
2.1 KiB
Diff

From 1808665b2b2e06d6f14762eb0ab82d65e3af3e2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mariusz Bialonczyk <manio@skyboo.net>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 12:40:53 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 678/703] w1: ds2413: when the slave is not responding during
read, select it again
commit 3856032a0628e6b94badb9131a706dda185e071d upstream.
The protocol is not allowing to obtain a byte of 0xff for PIO_ACCESS_READ
call. It is very likely that the slave was not addressed properly and
it is just not respoding (leaving the bus in logic high state) during
the read of sampled PIO value.
We cannot just call w1_reset_resume_command() because the problem will
persist, instead try selecting (addressing) the slave again.
Signed-off-by: Mariusz Bialonczyk <manio@skyboo.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2413.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2413.c
+++ b/drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2413.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#define W1_F3A_FUNC_PIO_ACCESS_READ 0xF5
#define W1_F3A_FUNC_PIO_ACCESS_WRITE 0x5A
#define W1_F3A_SUCCESS_CONFIRM_BYTE 0xAA
+#define W1_F3A_INVALID_PIO_STATE 0xFF
static ssize_t state_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *bin_attr, char *buf, loff_t off,
@@ -45,6 +46,7 @@ static ssize_t state_read(struct file *f
mutex_lock(&sl->master->bus_mutex);
dev_dbg(&sl->dev, "mutex locked");
+next:
if (w1_reset_select_slave(sl))
goto out;
@@ -52,10 +54,15 @@ static ssize_t state_read(struct file *f
w1_write_8(sl->master, W1_F3A_FUNC_PIO_ACCESS_READ);
*buf = w1_read_8(sl->master);
- /* check for correct complement */
if ((*buf & 0x0F) == ((~*buf >> 4) & 0x0F)) {
+ /* complement is correct */
bytes_read = 1;
goto out;
+ } else if (*buf == W1_F3A_INVALID_PIO_STATE) {
+ /* slave didn't respond, try to select it again */
+ dev_warn(&sl->dev, "slave device did not respond to PIO_ACCESS_READ, " \
+ "reselecting, retries left: %d\n", retries);
+ goto next;
}
if (w1_reset_resume_command(sl->master))