When compiled with glibc the config_scan.c wants to use the
cpupolicy2numeric() function which is only available when
HAVE_SCHED_SETSCHEDULER is set. It looks like the wrong define was used here.
This fixes a build problem with glibc in combination with the force
ac_cv_func_sched_setscheduler=no in the OpenWrt CONFIGURE_VARS.
This fixes the following compile error with glibc:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/bin/ld: config_scan.o: in function `socks_yylex':
dante-1.4.1/sockd/config_scan.l:461: undefined reference to `cpupolicy2numeric'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[5]: *** [Makefile:522: sockd] Error 1
Fixes: aaf46a8fe2 ("dante: disable sched_getscheduler() - not implemented in musl")
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
musl doesn't come with an valid implementation of `sched_getscheduler()`;
it simply returns -ENOSYS for it. Without this option (and compile dante
with `sched_getscheduler()` enabled), you will get
error: serverinit(): sched_getscheduler(2): failed to retrieve current
cpuscheduling policy: Function not implemented
and dante won't start at all.
Ref: http://lists.alpinelinux.org/alpine-devel/3932.html
Ref: http://lists.alpinelinux.org/alpine-devel/3936.html
Signed-off-by: David Yang <mmyangfl@gmail.com>
[slightly reword commit message]
Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich <jo@mein.io>
MD5SUM is wrong, it was not updated during last update to v1.4.1.
Thanks to Daniel Dickinson <openwrt@daniel.thecshore.com> for reporting it.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Thill <nico@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 48017
- 1.4.x has IPv6 support
- set C std explicitly due to gcc 5 changes/old code style of dante
- disable pam via configure vars since detection of without pam option
is broken (-lpam gets linked in if available)
- remove and refresh patches
only compile tested
Signed-off-by: Dirk Neukirchen <dirkneukirchen@web.de>
SVN-Revision: 47926
Note, that licensing stuff is a nightmare: many packages does not clearly
state their licenses, and often multiple source files are simply copied
together - each with different licensing information in the file headers.
I tried hard to ensure, that the license information extracted into the OpenWRT's
makefiles fit the "spirit" of the packages, e.g. such small packages which
come without a dedicated source archive "inherites" the OpenWRT's own license
in my opinion.
However, I can not garantee that I always picked the correct information
and/or did not miss license information.
Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold <mhei@heimpold.de>
SVN-Revision: 43155
