Recent versions of Chrome require this ciphers to successfully handshake with
a TLS enabled uhttpd server using the ustream-polarssl backend.
If `CONFIG_GCM` is disabled, `ssl_ciphersuite_from_id()` will return `NULL`
when cipher `0x9d` is looked up, causing the calling `ssl_ciphersuite_match()`
to fail with `POLARSSL_ERR_SSL_INTERNAL_ERROR`.
Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich <jo@mein.io>
This is a minor version update which fixes some small bugs. None of
these bugs were exploitable according to the release notes.
Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
SVN-Revision: 47724
Packages that depend on PolarSSL fail to build because polarssl's InstallDev
section never actually gets executed because (prior to this patch) the package
name does not match the subdir the package is in (presumably due to upstream
name change). As a workaround I have changed the package name back to
polarssl and used a new variable SRC_PKG_NAME for the purposes of downloading
the upstream tarball and creating PKG_BUILD_DIR.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Dickinson <openwrt@daniel.thecshore.com>
SVN-Revision: 46683
Note, that licensing stuff is a nightmare: many packages does not clearly
state their licenses, and often multiple source files are simply copied
together - each with different licensing information in the file headers.
I tried hard to ensure, that the license information extracted into the OpenWRT's
makefiles fit the "spirit" of the packages, e.g. such small packages which
come without a dedicated source archive "inherites" the OpenWRT's own license
in my opinion.
However, I can not garantee that I always picked the correct information
and/or did not miss license information.
Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold <mhei@heimpold.de>
SVN-Revision: 43155
