Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ansuel Smith
d284e6ef0f treewide: convert mtd-mac-address-increment* to generic implementation
Rework patch 681-NET-add-mtd-mac-address-support to implement
only the function to read the mac-address from mtd.
Generalize mtd-mac-address-increment function so it can be applied
to any source of of_get_mac_address.
Rename any mtd-mac-address-increment to mac-address-increment.
Rename any mtd-mac-address-increment-byte to mac-address-increment-byte.

This should make simplify the conversion of target to nvmem implementation.

Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
2021-07-19 14:51:22 +02:00
Daniel Golle
53a7d5d614 ath79: fix RS-485 on Teltonika RUT-955
DTR GPIO isn't actually needed and triggers boot warning.
TX pin was off by one (GPIO 19 instead of GPIO 18).

Reported-by: @tophirsch
Fixes: d1130ad265 ("ath79: add support for Teltonika RUT955")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
2021-03-17 17:41:24 +00:00
Adrian Schmutzler
6f96a4d043 ath79: remove model name from LED labels
Currently, we request LED labels in OpenWrt to follow the scheme

  modelname:color:function

However, specifying the modelname at the beginning is actually
entirely useless for the devices we support in OpenWrt. On the
contrary, having this part actually introduces inconvenience in
several aspects:

  - We need to ensure/check consistency with the DTS compatible
  - We have various exceptions where not the model name is used,
    but the vendor name (like tp-link), which is hard to track
    and justify even for core-developers
  - Having model-based components will not allow to share
    identical LED definitions in DTSI files
  - The inconsistency in what's used for the model part complicates
    several scripts, e.g. board.d/01_leds or LED migrations from
    ar71xx where this was even more messy

Apart from our needs, upstream has deprecated the label property
entirely and introduced new properties to specify color and
function properties separately. However, the implementation does
not appear to be ready and probably won't become ready and/or
match our requirements in the foreseeable future.

However, the limitation of generic LEDs to color and function
properties follows the same idea pointed out above. Generic LEDs
will get names like "green:status" or "red:indicator" then, and
if a "devicename" is prepended, it will be the one of an internal
device, like "phy1:amber:status".

With this patch, we move into the same direction, and just drop
the boardname from the LED labels. This allows to consolidate
a few definitions in DTSI files (will be much more on ramips),
and to drop a few migrations compared to ar71xx that just changed
the boardname. But mainly, it will liberate us from a completely
useless subject to take care of for device support review and
maintenance.
To also drop the boardname from existing configurations, a simple
migration routine is added unconditionally.

Although this seems unfamiliar at first look, a quick check in kernel
for the arm/arm64 dts files revealed that while 1033 lines have
labels with three parts *:*:*, still 284 actually use a two-part
labelling *:*, and thus is also acceptable and not even rare there.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-10-02 13:51:39 +02:00
Adrian Schmutzler
41cc7edc15 ath79: move dts-v1 statement to ath79.dtsi
The "/dts-v1/;" identifier is supposed to be present once at the
top of a device tree file after the includes have been processed.

In ath79, we therefore requested to have in the DTS files so far,
and omit it in the DTSI files. However, essentially the syntax of
the parent ath79.dtsi file already determines the DTS version, so
putting it into the DTS files is just a useless repetition.

Consequently, this patch puts the dts-v1 statement into the parent
ath79.dtsi, which is (indirectly) included by all DTS files. All
other occurences are removed.
Since the dts-v1 statement needs to be before any other definitions,
this also moves the includes to make sure the ath79.dtsi or its
descendants are always included first.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
2020-09-25 23:26:34 +02:00
Daniel Golle
aa0526b5f2 ath79: fix dts of Teltonika RUT9xx devices
The previous commits were missing a semicolon.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
2020-04-29 22:59:23 +01:00
Daniel Golle
aa4a33ac62 ath79: add support for Teltonika RUT955 H7V3C0
This board was previously supported in ar71xx as 'RUT9XX'. The
difference between that and the other RUT955 board already supported in
ath79 is that instead of the SPI shift registers driving the LEDs and
digital outputs that model got an I2C GPIO expander instead.

To support LEDs during early boot and interrupt-driven digital inputs,
I2C support as well as support for PCA953x has to be built-in and
cannot be kernel modules, hence select those symbols for ath79/generic.

Specification:

- 550/400/200 MHz (CPU/DDR/AHB)
- 128 MB of RAM (DDR2)
- 16 MB of FLASH (SPI NOR)
- 4x 10/100 Mbps Ethernet, with passive PoE support on LAN1
- 2T2R 2,4 GHz (AR9344)
- built-in 4G/3G module (example: Quectel EC-25EU)
- internal microSD slot (spi-mmc, buggy and disabled for now)
- RS232 on D-Sub9 port (Cypress ACM via USB, /dev/ttyACM0)
- RS422/RS485 (AR934x high speed UART, /dev/ttyATH1)
- analog 0-24V input (MCP3221)
- various digital inputs and outputs incl. a relay
- 11x LED (4 are driven by AR9344, 7 by PCA9539)
- 2x miniSIM slot (can be swapped via GPIO)
- 2x RP-SMA/F (Wi-Fi), 3x SMA/F (2x WWAN, GPS)
- 1x button (reset)
- DC jack for main power input (9-30 V)
- debugging UART available on PCB edge connector

Serial console (/dev/ttyS0) pinout:

- RX: pin1 (square) on top side of the main PCB (AR9344 is on top)
- TX: pin1 (square) on bottom side

Flash instruction:

Vendor firmware is based on OpenWrt CC release. Use the "factory" image
directly in GUI (make sure to uncheck "keep settings") or in U-Boot web
based recovery. To avoid any problems, make sure to first update vendor
firmware to latest version - "factory" image was successfully tested on
device running "RUT9XX_R_00.06.051" firmware and U-Boot "3.0.1".

Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
2020-04-29 21:32:35 +01:00