Neither the AsiaRF AWM002 or AWM003 actually has an LED on the module
board. The ld1 and ld2 do not represent actual LEDs. These pins might
connect to LEDS on an eval board or other carrier board, but that is
outside the scope of this device tree file.
Signed-off-by: Russell Senior <russell@personaltelco.net>
Add node aliases to dtsi files.
Reword dts files so they're more in-line with upstream.
Fix some more warnings and errors reported by dtc
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Galabov <sgalabov@gmail.com>
The upstream LED naming convention is "device:color:led-name", but it seems that many of supported boards in OpenWrt don't follow this approach.
The following patch fixes this inconsistency in dts{,i} files and updates base-files scripts for ramips target:
* fixes wrong indentation
* keeps case statements structure in same convention as in other scripts (no empty line after ";;", no indentation for case...esac body)
* fixes wrong LED names for some of boards (makes them the same as in dts{,i} files)
* combines boards with same configuration (ex. set_wifi_led "rt2800pci-phy0::radio" in 01_leds)
Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz <pepe2k@gmail.com>
SVN-Revision: 46664
The following patch fixes:
* wrong indentations
* doubled gpio-keys-polled nodes (DIR-300-B7, DIR-320-B1, DIR-610-A1)
* duplicate spacings
* empty lines at end of files and after last child nodes
* trailing and leading whitespace
* unnecessary and commented-out code
* missing empty lines between nodes and between properties and nodes
* unnecessary empty lines between nodes properties [1]
in .dts{,i} files, for ramips target.
[1] Some of empty lines in SOCs dtsi files were left untouched, because they seem to be there for a reason (readability?).
Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz <pepe2k@gmail.com>
SVN-Revision: 46613
