Currently the compile phase of the kernel builds `Image dtbs modules`.
However, none of the dtbs that get built are used for the final image.
This ends up unnecessarily taking CPU cycles and produces a lot of
`WARNINGS` that can lead users to believe there's cause for concern. I
believe the same principle can be applied to other targets.
```
DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-mtp.dtb
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi:2954.36-2962.5: Warning (clocks_property):
/soc/clock-controller@6400000: Missing property '#clock-cells' in node
/soc/mailbox@9820000 or bad phandle (referred from clocks[2])
DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-sony-xperia-tone-dora.dtb
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi:2954.36-2962.5: Warning (clocks_property):
/soc/clock-controller@6400000: Missing property '#clock-cells' in node
/soc/mailbox@9820000 or bad phandle (referred from clocks[2])
DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-sony-xperia-tone-kagura.dtb
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi:2954.36-2962.5: Warning (clocks_property):
/soc/clock-controller@6400000: Missing property '#clock-cells' in node
/soc/mailbox@9820000 or bad phandle (referred from clocks[2])
DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-sony-xperia-tone-keyaki.dtb
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi:2954.36-2962.5: Warning (clocks_property):
/soc/clock-controller@6400000: Missing property '#clock-cells' in node
/soc/mailbox@9820000 or bad phandle (referred from clocks[2])
DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-xiaomi-gemini.dtb
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi:2954.36-2962.5: Warning (clocks_property):
/soc/clock-controller@6400000: Missing property '#clock-cells' in node
/soc/mailbox@9820000 or bad phandle (referred from clocks[2])
DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-xiaomi-natrium.dtb
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi:2954.36-2962.5: Warning (clocks_property):
/soc/clock-controller@6400000: Missing property '#clock-cells' in node
/soc/mailbox@9820000 or bad phandle (referred from clocks[2])
DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996-xiaomi-scorpio.dtb
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi:2954.36-2962.5: Warning (clocks_property):
/soc/clock-controller@6400000: Missing property '#clock-cells' in node
/soc/mailbox@9820000 or bad phandle (referred from clocks[2])
```
Signed-off-by: Sean Khan <datapronix@protonmail.com>
6.6 has been in testing on qualcommax for a while so it should be in a
good shape, but lets default to it to get a wider audience.
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Introduce support for the Qualcomm IPQ60xx SoC. WiFi support still has
to be handled and correctly fix hence this is currently marked as
source-only to have a solid base to progress on correct support of this
and hope Upstream QUIC publish newers ath11k drivers for this SoC.
Co-developed-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mantas Pucka <mantas@8devices.com>
[ improve commit description, add SoB for Robert, make it source-only ]
Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Now that qualcommax exists as a target and dependencies have been updated
let move ipq807x support to subtarget of qualcommax.
This is mostly copy/paste with the exception of having to update SSDK and
NSS-DP to use CONFIG_TARGET_SUBTARGET.
This is a preparation for later addition of IPQ60xx and IPQ50xx support.
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Currently, ipq807x only covers Qualcomm IPQ807x SoC-s.
However, Qualcomm also has IPQ60xx and IPQ50xx SoC-s under the AX WiSoC-s
and they share a lot of stuff with IPQ807x, especially IPQ60xx so to avoid
duplicating kernel patches and everything lets make a common target with
per SoC subtargets.
Start doing that by renaming ipq807x to qualcommax so that dependencies
on ipq807x target can be updated.
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
