This prevents passing down the HOSTCC stuff set in u-boot.mk
which results in linking errors against openssl:
tools/mxsimage.o: In function `sb_aes_reinit':
mxsimage.c:(.text+0x202): undefined reference to `EVP_CIPHER_CTX_reset'
tools/mxsimage.o: In function `mxsimage_generate':
mxsimage.c:(.text+0x110d): undefined reference to `EVP_MD_CTX_new'
mxsimage.c:(.text+0x114f): undefined reference to `EVP_MD_CTX_free'
mxsimage.c:(.text+0x11c3): undefined reference to `EVP_MD_CTX_new'
mxsimage.c:(.text+0x1323): undefined reference to `EVP_MD_CTX_free'
mxsimage.c:(.text+0x134a): undefined reference to `EVP_CIPHER_CTX_reset'
tools/mxsimage.o: In function `mxsimage_verify_print_header':
mxsimage.c:(.text+0x23ce): undefined reference to `EVP_MD_CTX_new'
mxsimage.c:(.text+0x242c): undefined reference to `EVP_MD_CTX_new'
mxsimage.c:(.text+0x246b): undefined reference to `EVP_MD_CTX_free'
mxsimage.c:(.text+0x24ef): undefined reference to `EVP_CIPHER_CTX_reset'
mxsimage.c:(.text+0x2e52): undefined reference to `EVP_MD_CTX_free'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold <mhei@heimpold.de>
Do not put the u-boot images into the kernel build directory as this directory
might get removed after kernel updates while the u-boot packages InstallDev
recipe is not getting re-executed because it is still considered current,
leading to image build failures later on due to missing images.
To ensure that built bootloader images persist over kernel version updates in
the buildroot, put them into the new STAGING_DIR_IMAGE directory.
Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich <jo@mein.io>
gcc-5 handles inline without static differently and that makes
uboot-mxs fail to build. Remove the inline so it gets exported and can
be used in other functions.
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
SVN-Revision: 47533
The current patch to add Duckbill support is wrong and does not
even compile. So replace this patch with a working one.
Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold <mhei@heimpold.de>
SVN-Revision: 47007
Note, that licensing stuff is a nightmare: many packages does not clearly
state their licenses, and often multiple source files are simply copied
together - each with different licensing information in the file headers.
I tried hard to ensure, that the license information extracted into the OpenWRT's
makefiles fit the "spirit" of the packages, e.g. such small packages which
come without a dedicated source archive "inherites" the OpenWRT's own license
in my opinion.
However, I can not garantee that I always picked the correct information
and/or did not miss license information.
Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold <mhei@heimpold.de>
SVN-Revision: 43155
