Add the patches with real changes from the binutils 2.40 stable branch.
I am not aware that we ran into any of these problems, but I think it is
better to take the existing stable patches.
They were exported like this:
git format-patch binutils-2_40...origin/binutils-2_40-branch
I removed the patches changing the version numbers and updating the
translations only.
I removed the following patches:
*Automatic-date-updat*
001-Re-enable-development.-Update-version-to-2.40.0.patch
004-Updated-translations-for-the-gas-and-binutils-sub-di.patch
015-Updated-Swedish-translation-for-the-binutils-sub-dir.patch
027-Updated-Swedish-translation-for-the-binutils-sub-dir.patch
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
Add the patches with real changes from the binutils 2.39 stable branch.
I am not aware that we ran into any of these problems, but I think it is
better to take the existing stable patches.
They were exported like this:
git format-patch binutils-2_39...origin/binutils-2_39-branch
I removed the patches changing the version numbers only.
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
Commit 53470bdf32 ("toolchain/binutils: Add binutils 2.34") logs refreshed
patches, but also adds a typo causing failed builds on mipsel64 platforms,
including the malta subtarget. Update the patch to fix this.
This fixes the following build error:
make[7]: *** No rule to make target 'elf64ltsmip.o', needed by 'ld-new'. Stop.
Fixes: FS#3276
Fixes: 53470bdf32 ("toolchain/binutils: Add binutils 2.34")
Signed-off-by: Tony Ambardar <itugrok@yahoo.com>
We currently support four versions of binutils in parallel. Let's
just keep the latest two and drop the older ones before the next
one comes around.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
Backport commit 3d9c8f6b3f033a6092425b7344647fb51dbed5c6
Without this binutils doesn't properly link u-boot
Source:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23571
Signed-off-by: Daniel Engberg <daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net>
With forced PIE and SSP support I ran into this assertion failure.
backport two patches to fix this problem from the binutils 2.28 branch.
This fix is already included in binutils 2.28.1 and 2.29.
Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
arc-2016.09 is the most recent toolchain for ARC cores and
it is based on top of upstream Binutils 2.27 and GCC 6.2.1.
With updated major version of GCC we copied all GCC 6.x patches
for ARC as well as Bintils 2.27 patches.
Note that toochain sports ARCv4 ABI and so must be used
with 4.8+ Linux kernels. Even though it will build v4.4 kernel
perfectly fine on attempt to run user-space apps they won't
work with older kernel. That said previuosly sent RFC patches with
Linux kernel update are required:
[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/726686/
[2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/726687/
Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>
Binutils recently updated the ABI version to 5, which broke glibc, as it
refuses to load anything > 3. Upstream reverted the ABI version update,
so backport the commit.
Fixes the following error on boot:
/bin/sh: error while loading shared libraries: /lib/libcrypt.so.1: ELF file ABI version invalid
[ 0.920077] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x00007f00
[ 0.920077]
[ 0.929450] Rebooting in 1 seconds..
Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>
Add binutils 2.27 to toolchain
Signed-off-by: Daniel Engberg <daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net>
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name> [refresh patches]
This change switches ARC tools to the most recent arc-2016.03
version.
ARC GNU tools of version arc-2016.03 bring some quite significant
changes like:
* Binutils v2.26+ (upstream commit id 202ac19 with additional ARC
* patches)
* GCC v4.8.5
* GDB 7.10
More about changes, improvements and fixes could be found here:
https://github.com/foss-for-synopsys-dwc-arc-processors/toolchain/releases/tag/arc-2016.03
Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
Musl is an alternative C-library, see http://www.musl-libc.org for more infos.
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 34314
There is no point in keeping around 2.21 when 2.21.1 which is a bugfix release
is there.
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 34265
