Setting encaplimit to a numerical value results into the value being
included as tunnel encapsulation limit in the destination option header
for tunneled packets.
Several users have reported interop issues as not all ISPs support the
destination option header containing the tunnel encapsulation limit
resulting into broken map connectivity.
Therefore drop the default encaplimit value for map tunnels so
no destination option header is included by default.
Signed-off-by: Hans Dedecker <dedeckeh@gmail.com>
(backported from d9691b66e2)
Be compatible with ISPs which don't support the destination option header containing
the tunnel encapsulation limit as reported in FS#1501.
Setting the uci parameter encaplimit to ignore; allows to disable the insertion
of the destination option header in the map-e packets.
Otherwise the tunnel encapsulation limit value can be set to a value from 0 till 255
by setting the encaplimit uci parameter accordingly.
If no encaplimit value is specified the default value is 4 as before.
Signed-off-by: Hans Dedecker <dedeckeh@gmail.com>
Fix psidlen becomes negative in case embedded address bit lenght is smaller than
IPv4 suffix length.
While at it improve parameter checking making the code more logical and
easier to read.
Signed-off-by: Hans Dedecker <dedeckeh@gmail.com>
Replace the string array containing the fmrs parameters by a nested data
json object holding an array of fmrs parameters
Signed-off-by: Hans Dedecker <dedeckeh@gmail.com>
Delete the map-t device when tearing down the map-t interface; as such
there's no conflict when the map-t interface comes up again when trying
to add the map-t device as the map-t device was still present
(Can not add: device 'map-wan6_4' already exists!).
Only call ifdown in teardown for map-e and lw6o4 map interfaces types
in order to suppress the trace "wan6_4 (6652): Interface wan6_4_ not found"
Signed-off-by: Hans Dedecker <dedeckeh@gmail.com>
Since r46834, IPv6 support is builtin if selected. Therefor, dependencies
on kmod-ipv6 can no longer be fulfilled, since it is not a module anymore.
Signed-off-by: Arjen de Korte <arjen+openwrt@de-korte.org>
SVN-Revision: 47022
Note, that licensing stuff is a nightmare: many packages does not clearly
state their licenses, and often multiple source files are simply copied
together - each with different licensing information in the file headers.
I tried hard to ensure, that the license information extracted into the OpenWRT's
makefiles fit the "spirit" of the packages, e.g. such small packages which
come without a dedicated source archive "inherites" the OpenWRT's own license
in my opinion.
However, I can not garantee that I always picked the correct information
and/or did not miss license information.
Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold <mhei@heimpold.de>
SVN-Revision: 43155
