ExternalVendorCode/openwrt
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt.git synced 2024-12-21 22:47:56 +00:00
Code Issues Actions 7 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

openssl: update to 3.0.9

Browse Source 
CVE-2023-2650 fix
Remove upstreamed patches

Major changes between OpenSSL 3.0.8 and OpenSSL 3.0.9 [30 May 2023]
 * Mitigate for very slow OBJ_obj2txt() performance with gigantic OBJECT IDENTIFIER sub-identities. (CVE-2023-2650)
 * Fixed buffer overread in AES-XTS decryption on ARM 64 bit platforms (CVE-2023-1255)
 * Fixed documentation of X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() (CVE-2023-0466)
 * Fixed handling of invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates (CVE-2023-0465)
 * Limited the number of nodes created in a policy tree (CVE-2023-0464)

Signed-off-by: Ivan Pavlov <AuthorReflex@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 6348850f10)
This commit is contained in:
Ivan Pavlov 2023-06-04 22:34:39 +03:00 committed by Hauke Mehrtens
parent c78ba8a695
commit e1d59497e9
5 changed files with 4 additions and 294 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
package/libs/openssl/Makefile
View File

@ -8,8 +8,8 @@
include $(TOPDIR)/rules.mk include $(TOPDIR)/rules.mk
PKG_NAME:=openssl PKG_NAME:=openssl
PKG_VERSION:=3.0.8 PKG_VERSION:=3.0.9
PKG_RELEASE:=10 PKG_RELEASE:=1
PKG_BUILD_FLAGS:=no-mips16 gc-sections PKG_BUILD_FLAGS:=no-mips16 gc-sections
PKG_BUILD_PARALLEL:=1 PKG_BUILD_PARALLEL:=1
@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ PKG_SOURCE_URL:= \
ftp://ftp.pca.dfn.de/pub/tools/net/openssl/source/ \ ftp://ftp.pca.dfn.de/pub/tools/net/openssl/source/ \
ftp://ftp.pca.dfn.de/pub/tools/net/openssl/source/old/$(PKG_BASE)/ ftp://ftp.pca.dfn.de/pub/tools/net/openssl/source/old/$(PKG_BASE)/
PKG_HASH:=6c13d2bf38fdf31eac3ce2a347073673f5d63263398f1f69d0df4a41253e4b3e PKG_HASH:=eb1ab04781474360f77c318ab89d8c5a03abc38e63d65a603cabbf1b00a1dc90
PKG_LICENSE:=Apache-2.0 PKG_LICENSE:=Apache-2.0
PKG_LICENSE_FILES:=LICENSE PKG_LICENSE_FILES:=LICENSE

2
package/libs/openssl/patches/120-strip-cflags-from-binary.patch
View File

@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Signed-off-by: Eneas U de Queiroz <cote2004-github@yahoo.com>
--- a/crypto/build.info --- a/crypto/build.info
+++ b/crypto/build.info +++ b/crypto/build.info
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ DEFINE[../libcrypto]=$UPLINKDEF @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ DEFINE[../libcrypto]=$UPLINKDEF
DEPEND[info.o]=buildinf.h DEPEND[info.o]=buildinf.h
DEPEND[cversion.o]=buildinf.h DEPEND[cversion.o]=buildinf.h

207
package/libs/openssl/patches/200-x509-excessive-resource-use-verifying-policy-constra.patch
View File

@ -1,207 +0,0 @@
From 959c59c7a0164117e7f8366466a32bb1f8d77ff1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pauli <pauli@openssl.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 15:28:20 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] x509: excessive resource use verifying policy constraints
A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions
of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains
that include policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this
vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers
exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service
(DoS) attack on affected systems.
Fixes CVE-2023-0464
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20568)
--- a/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h
+++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h
@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ struct X509_POLICY_LEVEL_st {
};
struct X509_POLICY_TREE_st {
+ /* The number of nodes in the tree */
+ size_t node_count;
+ /* The maximum number of nodes in the tree */
+ size_t node_maximum;
+
/* This is the tree 'level' data */
X509_POLICY_LEVEL *levels;
int nlevel;
@@ -157,7 +162,8 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_tree_find_
X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
X509_POLICY_NODE *parent,
- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree);
+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree,
+ int extra_data);
void ossl_policy_node_free(X509_POLICY_NODE *node);
int ossl_policy_node_match(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lvl,
const X509_POLICY_NODE *node, const ASN1_OBJECT *oid);
--- a/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c
+++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c
@@ -59,10 +59,15 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_find
X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
X509_POLICY_NODE *parent,
- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree,
+ int extra_data)
{
X509_POLICY_NODE *node;
+ /* Verify that the tree isn't too large. This mitigates CVE-2023-0464 */
+ if (tree->node_maximum > 0 && tree->node_count >= tree->node_maximum)
+ return NULL;
+
node = OPENSSL_zalloc(sizeof(*node));
if (node == NULL) {
ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_X509V3, ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE);
@@ -70,7 +75,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_
}
node->data = data;
node->parent = parent;
- if (level) {
+ if (level != NULL) {
if (OBJ_obj2nid(data->valid_policy) == NID_any_policy) {
if (level->anyPolicy)
goto node_error;
@@ -90,7 +95,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_
}
}
- if (tree) {
+ if (extra_data) {
if (tree->extra_data == NULL)
tree->extra_data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_new_null();
if (tree->extra_data == NULL){
@@ -103,6 +108,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_
}
}
+ tree->node_count++;
if (parent)
parent->nchild++;
--- a/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c
+++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c
@@ -14,6 +14,17 @@
#include "pcy_local.h"
+/*
+ * If the maximum number of nodes in the policy tree isn't defined, set it to
+ * a generous default of 1000 nodes.
+ *
+ * Defining this to be zero means unlimited policy tree growth which opens the
+ * door on CVE-2023-0464.
+ */
+#ifndef OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX
+# define OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX 1000
+#endif
+
static void expected_print(BIO *channel,
X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lev, X509_POLICY_NODE *node,
int indent)
@@ -163,6 +174,9 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **
return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL;
}
+ /* Limit the growth of the tree to mitigate CVE-2023-0464 */
+ tree->node_maximum = OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX;
+
/*
* http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-6.1.2, figure 3.
*
@@ -180,7 +194,7 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **
if ((data = ossl_policy_data_new(NULL,
OBJ_nid2obj(NID_any_policy), 0)) == NULL)
goto bad_tree;
- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree) == NULL) {
+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree, 1) == NULL) {
ossl_policy_data_free(data);
goto bad_tree;
}
@@ -239,7 +253,8 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **
* Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise
*/
static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
- X509_POLICY_DATA *data)
+ X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
{
X509_POLICY_LEVEL *last = curr - 1;
int i, matched = 0;
@@ -249,13 +264,13 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509
X509_POLICY_NODE *node = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_value(last->nodes, i);
if (ossl_policy_node_match(last, node, data->valid_policy)) {
- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, NULL) == NULL)
+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 0) == NULL)
return 0;
matched = 1;
}
}
if (!matched && last->anyPolicy) {
- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL)
+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL)
return 0;
}
return 1;
@@ -268,7 +283,8 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509
* Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise.
*/
static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
- const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache)
+ const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache,
+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
{
int i;
@@ -276,7 +292,7 @@ static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_L
X509_POLICY_DATA *data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_value(cache->data, i);
/* Look for matching nodes in previous level */
- if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data))
+ if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data, tree))
return 0;
}
return 1;
@@ -307,7 +323,7 @@ static int tree_add_unmatched(X509_POLIC
/* Curr may not have anyPolicy */
data->qualifier_set = cache->anyPolicy->qualifier_set;
data->flags |= POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS;
- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree) == NULL) {
+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 1) == NULL) {
ossl_policy_data_free(data);
return 0;
}
@@ -370,7 +386,7 @@ static int tree_link_any(X509_POLICY_LEV
/* Finally add link to anyPolicy */
if (last->anyPolicy &&
ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, cache->anyPolicy,
- last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL)
+ last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL)
return 0;
return 1;
}
@@ -553,7 +569,7 @@ static int tree_calculate_user_set(X509_
extra->flags = POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS
| POLICY_DATA_FLAG_EXTRA_NODE;
node = ossl_policy_level_add_node(NULL, extra, anyPolicy->parent,
- tree);
+ tree, 1);
}
if (!tree->user_policies) {
tree->user_policies = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_new_null();
@@ -580,7 +596,7 @@ static int tree_evaluate(X509_POLICY_TRE
for (i = 1; i < tree->nlevel; i++, curr++) {
cache = ossl_policy_cache_set(curr->cert);
- if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache))
+ if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache, tree))
return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL;
if (!(curr->flags & X509_V_FLAG_INHIBIT_ANY)

44
package/libs/openssl/patches/210-Ensure-that-EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY-is-checked-even-in.patch
View File

@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
From 1dd43e0709fece299b15208f36cc7c76209ba0bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 16:52:55 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Ensure that EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY is checked even in leaf
certs
Even though we check the leaf cert to confirm it is valid, we
later ignored the invalid flag and did not notice that the leaf
cert was bad.
Fixes: CVE-2023-0465
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20587)
--- a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
+++ b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
@@ -1654,15 +1654,23 @@ static int check_policy(X509_STORE_CTX *
goto memerr;
/* Invalid or inconsistent extensions */
if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_INVALID) {
- int i;
+ int i, cbcalled = 0;
/* Locate certificates with bad extensions and notify callback. */
- for (i = 1; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) {
X509 *x = sk_X509_value(ctx->chain, i);
+ if ((x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY) != 0)
+ cbcalled = 1;
CB_FAIL_IF((x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY) != 0,
ctx, x, i, X509_V_ERR_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION);
}
+ if (!cbcalled) {
+ /* Should not be able to get here */
+ ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_X509, ERR_R_INTERNAL_ERROR);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ /* The callback ignored the error so we return success */
return 1;
}
if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_FAILURE) {

39
package/libs/openssl/patches/220-aesv8-armx.pl-Avoid-buffer-overrread-in-AES-XTS-decr.patch
View File

@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
From 02ac9c9420275868472f33b01def01218742b8bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 16:51:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] aesv8-armx.pl: Avoid buffer overrread in AES-XTS decryption
Original author: Nevine Ebeid (Amazon)
Fixes: CVE-2023-1255
The buffer overread happens on decrypts of 4 mod 5 sizes.
Unless the memory just after the buffer is unmapped this is harmless.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20759)
(cherry picked from commit 72dfe46550ee1f1bbfacd49f071419365bc23304)
diff --git a/crypto/aes/asm/aesv8-armx.pl b/crypto/aes/asm/aesv8-armx.pl
index 6a7bf05d1b..bd583e2c89 100755
--- a/crypto/aes/asm/aesv8-armx.pl
+++ b/crypto/aes/asm/aesv8-armx.pl
@@ -3353,7 +3353,7 @@ $code.=<<___ if ($flavour =~ /64/);
.align 4
.Lxts_dec_tail4x:
add $inp,$inp,#16
- vld1.32 {$dat0},[$inp],#16
+ tst $tailcnt,#0xf
veor $tmp1,$dat1,$tmp0
vst1.8 {$tmp1},[$out],#16
veor $tmp2,$dat2,$tmp2
@@ -3362,6 +3362,8 @@ $code.=<<___ if ($flavour =~ /64/);
veor $tmp4,$dat4,$tmp4
vst1.8 {$tmp3-$tmp4},[$out],#32
+ b.eq .Lxts_dec_abort
+ vld1.32 {$dat0},[$inp],#16
b .Lxts_done
.align 4
.Lxts_outer_dec_tail: